Youth psychotherapy outcome research: A review and critique of the evidence base

John R. Weisz, Amanda Doss, Kristin M. Hawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

217 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past four decades, researchers have produced extensive evidence on psychotherapy for youth mental health problems and disorders. The evidence often has been evaluated through narrative reviews and through meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of treatment effects, but methodological analysis addressing the character and quality of the evidence base itself is an important complement, needed to place treatment effects in perspective and to suggest directions for future research. We carried out such an analysis, focusing on all the methodologically acceptable published randomized trials our search identified involving treatment of anxiety, depression, ADHD and related conditions, and conduct-related problems and disorders. The 236 studies tested 383 treatments and included 427 treatment-control comparisons, spanning the years 1962 through 2002. The analysis revealed considerable breadth, diversity, and rigor in the measurement approaches used to assess participant characteristics and treatment outcomes. However, reporting on important sample characteristics (e.g., ethnicity) showed major gaps, and more than half the studies failed to use well-standardized procedures to ensure appropriate sample selection. Because sample sizes left most studies underpowered, and procedures to enhance treatment fidelity were generally weak, many of the treatments investigated may not have received fair tests. Studies were particularly weak in clinical representativeness of their samples, therapists, and settings, suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-363
Number of pages27
JournalAnnual Review of Psychology
Volume56
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 11 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Outcomes Research
Mental Disorders
Sample Size
Meta-Analysis
Mental Health
Anxiety
Research Personnel
Depression
Research
Treatment Effects

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Children
  • Mental health
  • Psychotherapy
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Youth psychotherapy outcome research : A review and critique of the evidence base. / Weisz, John R.; Doss, Amanda; Hawley, Kristin M.

In: Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 56, 11.03.2005, p. 337-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01464fe30ec645e2a61f89ce0b805d7b,
title = "Youth psychotherapy outcome research: A review and critique of the evidence base",
abstract = "Over the past four decades, researchers have produced extensive evidence on psychotherapy for youth mental health problems and disorders. The evidence often has been evaluated through narrative reviews and through meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of treatment effects, but methodological analysis addressing the character and quality of the evidence base itself is an important complement, needed to place treatment effects in perspective and to suggest directions for future research. We carried out such an analysis, focusing on all the methodologically acceptable published randomized trials our search identified involving treatment of anxiety, depression, ADHD and related conditions, and conduct-related problems and disorders. The 236 studies tested 383 treatments and included 427 treatment-control comparisons, spanning the years 1962 through 2002. The analysis revealed considerable breadth, diversity, and rigor in the measurement approaches used to assess participant characteristics and treatment outcomes. However, reporting on important sample characteristics (e.g., ethnicity) showed major gaps, and more than half the studies failed to use well-standardized procedures to ensure appropriate sample selection. Because sample sizes left most studies underpowered, and procedures to enhance treatment fidelity were generally weak, many of the treatments investigated may not have received fair tests. Studies were particularly weak in clinical representativeness of their samples, therapists, and settings, suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Children, Mental health, Psychotherapy, Treatment",
author = "Weisz, {John R.} and Amanda Doss and Hawley, {Kristin M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141449",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "337--363",
journal = "Annual Review of Psychology",
issn = "0066-4308",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth psychotherapy outcome research

T2 - A review and critique of the evidence base

AU - Weisz, John R.

AU - Doss, Amanda

AU - Hawley, Kristin M.

PY - 2005/3/11

Y1 - 2005/3/11

N2 - Over the past four decades, researchers have produced extensive evidence on psychotherapy for youth mental health problems and disorders. The evidence often has been evaluated through narrative reviews and through meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of treatment effects, but methodological analysis addressing the character and quality of the evidence base itself is an important complement, needed to place treatment effects in perspective and to suggest directions for future research. We carried out such an analysis, focusing on all the methodologically acceptable published randomized trials our search identified involving treatment of anxiety, depression, ADHD and related conditions, and conduct-related problems and disorders. The 236 studies tested 383 treatments and included 427 treatment-control comparisons, spanning the years 1962 through 2002. The analysis revealed considerable breadth, diversity, and rigor in the measurement approaches used to assess participant characteristics and treatment outcomes. However, reporting on important sample characteristics (e.g., ethnicity) showed major gaps, and more than half the studies failed to use well-standardized procedures to ensure appropriate sample selection. Because sample sizes left most studies underpowered, and procedures to enhance treatment fidelity were generally weak, many of the treatments investigated may not have received fair tests. Studies were particularly weak in clinical representativeness of their samples, therapists, and settings, suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.

AB - Over the past four decades, researchers have produced extensive evidence on psychotherapy for youth mental health problems and disorders. The evidence often has been evaluated through narrative reviews and through meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of treatment effects, but methodological analysis addressing the character and quality of the evidence base itself is an important complement, needed to place treatment effects in perspective and to suggest directions for future research. We carried out such an analysis, focusing on all the methodologically acceptable published randomized trials our search identified involving treatment of anxiety, depression, ADHD and related conditions, and conduct-related problems and disorders. The 236 studies tested 383 treatments and included 427 treatment-control comparisons, spanning the years 1962 through 2002. The analysis revealed considerable breadth, diversity, and rigor in the measurement approaches used to assess participant characteristics and treatment outcomes. However, reporting on important sample characteristics (e.g., ethnicity) showed major gaps, and more than half the studies failed to use well-standardized procedures to ensure appropriate sample selection. Because sample sizes left most studies underpowered, and procedures to enhance treatment fidelity were generally weak, many of the treatments investigated may not have received fair tests. Studies were particularly weak in clinical representativeness of their samples, therapists, and settings, suggesting a need for increased emphasis on external validity in youth treatment research.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Children

KW - Mental health

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14544277990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14544277990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141449

DO - 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141449

M3 - Article

C2 - 15709939

AN - SCOPUS:14544277990

VL - 56

SP - 337

EP - 363

JO - Annual Review of Psychology

JF - Annual Review of Psychology

SN - 0066-4308

ER -