Wound healing outcomes

Using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates

William J. Ennis, Rachel A. Hoffman, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, Robert Kirsner, Hanna M. Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chronic wounds are increasing in prevalence and are a costly problem for the US healthcare system and throughout the world. Typically outcomes studies in the field of wound care have been limited to small clinical trials, comparative effectiveness cohorts and attempts to extrapolate results from claims databases. As a result, outcomes in real world clinical settings may differ from these published studies. This study presents a modified intent-to-treat framework for measuring wound outcomes and measures the consistency of population based outcomes across two distinct settings. In this retrospective observational analysis, we describe the largest to date, cohort of patient wound outcomes derived from 626 hospital based clinics and one academic tertiary care clinic. We present the results of a modified intent-to-treat analysis of wound outcomes as well as demographic and descriptive data. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final analytic sample includes the outcomes from 667,291 wounds in the national sample and 1,788 wounds in the academic sample. We found a consistent modified intent to treat healing rate of 74.6% from the 626 clinics and 77.6% in the academic center. We recommend that a standard modified intent to treat healing rate be used to report wound outcomes to allow for consistency and comparability in measurement across providers, payers and healthcare systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)665-672
Number of pages8
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
Tertiary Healthcare
Demography
Clinical Trials
Databases
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Wound healing outcomes : Using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates. / Ennis, William J.; Hoffman, Rachel A.; Gurtner, Geoffrey C.; Kirsner, Robert; Gordon, Hanna M.

In: Wound Repair and Regeneration, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 665-672.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ennis, William J. ; Hoffman, Rachel A. ; Gurtner, Geoffrey C. ; Kirsner, Robert ; Gordon, Hanna M. / Wound healing outcomes : Using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates. In: Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 665-672.
@article{25a6ea5b8f8b4615bc919fd0a7fb3e25,
title = "Wound healing outcomes: Using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates",
abstract = "Chronic wounds are increasing in prevalence and are a costly problem for the US healthcare system and throughout the world. Typically outcomes studies in the field of wound care have been limited to small clinical trials, comparative effectiveness cohorts and attempts to extrapolate results from claims databases. As a result, outcomes in real world clinical settings may differ from these published studies. This study presents a modified intent-to-treat framework for measuring wound outcomes and measures the consistency of population based outcomes across two distinct settings. In this retrospective observational analysis, we describe the largest to date, cohort of patient wound outcomes derived from 626 hospital based clinics and one academic tertiary care clinic. We present the results of a modified intent-to-treat analysis of wound outcomes as well as demographic and descriptive data. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final analytic sample includes the outcomes from 667,291 wounds in the national sample and 1,788 wounds in the academic sample. We found a consistent modified intent to treat healing rate of 74.6{\%} from the 626 clinics and 77.6{\%} in the academic center. We recommend that a standard modified intent to treat healing rate be used to report wound outcomes to allow for consistency and comparability in measurement across providers, payers and healthcare systems.",
author = "Ennis, {William J.} and Hoffman, {Rachel A.} and Gurtner, {Geoffrey C.} and Robert Kirsner and Gordon, {Hanna M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/wrr.12575",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "665--672",
journal = "Wound Repair and Regeneration",
issn = "1067-1927",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wound healing outcomes

T2 - Using big data and a modified intent-to-treat method as a metric for reporting healing rates

AU - Ennis, William J.

AU - Hoffman, Rachel A.

AU - Gurtner, Geoffrey C.

AU - Kirsner, Robert

AU - Gordon, Hanna M.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Chronic wounds are increasing in prevalence and are a costly problem for the US healthcare system and throughout the world. Typically outcomes studies in the field of wound care have been limited to small clinical trials, comparative effectiveness cohorts and attempts to extrapolate results from claims databases. As a result, outcomes in real world clinical settings may differ from these published studies. This study presents a modified intent-to-treat framework for measuring wound outcomes and measures the consistency of population based outcomes across two distinct settings. In this retrospective observational analysis, we describe the largest to date, cohort of patient wound outcomes derived from 626 hospital based clinics and one academic tertiary care clinic. We present the results of a modified intent-to-treat analysis of wound outcomes as well as demographic and descriptive data. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final analytic sample includes the outcomes from 667,291 wounds in the national sample and 1,788 wounds in the academic sample. We found a consistent modified intent to treat healing rate of 74.6% from the 626 clinics and 77.6% in the academic center. We recommend that a standard modified intent to treat healing rate be used to report wound outcomes to allow for consistency and comparability in measurement across providers, payers and healthcare systems.

AB - Chronic wounds are increasing in prevalence and are a costly problem for the US healthcare system and throughout the world. Typically outcomes studies in the field of wound care have been limited to small clinical trials, comparative effectiveness cohorts and attempts to extrapolate results from claims databases. As a result, outcomes in real world clinical settings may differ from these published studies. This study presents a modified intent-to-treat framework for measuring wound outcomes and measures the consistency of population based outcomes across two distinct settings. In this retrospective observational analysis, we describe the largest to date, cohort of patient wound outcomes derived from 626 hospital based clinics and one academic tertiary care clinic. We present the results of a modified intent-to-treat analysis of wound outcomes as well as demographic and descriptive data. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final analytic sample includes the outcomes from 667,291 wounds in the national sample and 1,788 wounds in the academic sample. We found a consistent modified intent to treat healing rate of 74.6% from the 626 clinics and 77.6% in the academic center. We recommend that a standard modified intent to treat healing rate be used to report wound outcomes to allow for consistency and comparability in measurement across providers, payers and healthcare systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033787006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033787006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/wrr.12575

DO - 10.1111/wrr.12575

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 665

EP - 672

JO - Wound Repair and Regeneration

JF - Wound Repair and Regeneration

SN - 1067-1927

IS - 4

ER -