Without language, no distinctly human numerosity: A Reply to Coolidge and Overmann

Caleb Everett

doi:10.1086/668795

Without language, no distinctly human numerosity: A Reply to Coolidge and Overmann

Caleb Everett

Anthropology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	81-82
Number of pages	2
Journal	Current Anthropology
Volume	54
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1086/668795
State	Published - Feb 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Archaeology
Anthropology
Archaeology

Access to Document

10.1086/668795

Cite this

@article{ccf8b7d6dec14bd3be0156c814c6c2ef,

title = "Without language, no distinctly human numerosity: A Reply to Coolidge and Overmann",

author = "Caleb Everett",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1086/668795",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "54",

pages = "81--82",

journal = "Current Anthropology",

issn = "0011-3204",

publisher = "University of Chicago",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Without language, no distinctly human numerosity

T2 - A Reply to Coolidge and Overmann

AU - Everett, Caleb

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873830175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873830175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/668795

DO - 10.1086/668795

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84873830175

VL - 54

SP - 81

EP - 82

JO - Current Anthropology

JF - Current Anthropology

SN - 0011-3204

IS - 1

ER -

Without language, no distinctly human numerosity: A Reply to Coolidge and Overmann

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this