Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the last two decades medical and social changes have occurred to shift the focus from the dying patient to the chronically impaired, from voluntary to involuntary and from euthanasia to withholding/withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments. Acceptance by the courts of various theories and devices, such as "surrogate" decision-makers, medical/judicial review and living wills, has extended the patient's constitutional right of privacy to justify termination of life supports to allow a natural death. The AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs in 1986 included artificially supplied nutrition and hydration in its definition of life-prolonging medical treatment. Currently, state legislatures and the courts are struggling with the task of balancing the extent of patient autonomy and the state interest in preservation of life. In the rush to acknowledge the quality of life, the sanctity of life must not be discarded. Comprehensive legal reform in this area must strengthen the legal rights and obligations of both patients, their families and physicians.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-828
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Florida Medical Association
Volume77
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 1990

Fingerprint

Food
Jurisprudence
Living Wills
Value of Life
Civil Rights
Euthanasia
Privacy
Family Physicians
Patient Rights
Social Change
Quality of Life
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle. / Caralis, Panagiota V.

In: Journal of the Florida Medical Association, Vol. 77, No. 9, 01.09.1990, p. 821-828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55859cf3b6c74b06b329b66c3b3bafda,
title = "Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.",
abstract = "In the last two decades medical and social changes have occurred to shift the focus from the dying patient to the chronically impaired, from voluntary to involuntary and from euthanasia to withholding/withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments. Acceptance by the courts of various theories and devices, such as {"}surrogate{"} decision-makers, medical/judicial review and living wills, has extended the patient's constitutional right of privacy to justify termination of life supports to allow a natural death. The AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs in 1986 included artificially supplied nutrition and hydration in its definition of life-prolonging medical treatment. Currently, state legislatures and the courts are struggling with the task of balancing the extent of patient autonomy and the state interest in preservation of life. In the rush to acknowledge the quality of life, the sanctity of life must not be discarded. Comprehensive legal reform in this area must strengthen the legal rights and obligations of both patients, their families and physicians.",
author = "Caralis, {Panagiota V.}",
year = "1990",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "821--828",
journal = "The Journal of the Florida Medical Association",
issn = "0015-4148",
publisher = "Florida Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.

AU - Caralis, Panagiota V.

PY - 1990/9/1

Y1 - 1990/9/1

N2 - In the last two decades medical and social changes have occurred to shift the focus from the dying patient to the chronically impaired, from voluntary to involuntary and from euthanasia to withholding/withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments. Acceptance by the courts of various theories and devices, such as "surrogate" decision-makers, medical/judicial review and living wills, has extended the patient's constitutional right of privacy to justify termination of life supports to allow a natural death. The AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs in 1986 included artificially supplied nutrition and hydration in its definition of life-prolonging medical treatment. Currently, state legislatures and the courts are struggling with the task of balancing the extent of patient autonomy and the state interest in preservation of life. In the rush to acknowledge the quality of life, the sanctity of life must not be discarded. Comprehensive legal reform in this area must strengthen the legal rights and obligations of both patients, their families and physicians.

AB - In the last two decades medical and social changes have occurred to shift the focus from the dying patient to the chronically impaired, from voluntary to involuntary and from euthanasia to withholding/withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments. Acceptance by the courts of various theories and devices, such as "surrogate" decision-makers, medical/judicial review and living wills, has extended the patient's constitutional right of privacy to justify termination of life supports to allow a natural death. The AMA's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs in 1986 included artificially supplied nutrition and hydration in its definition of life-prolonging medical treatment. Currently, state legislatures and the courts are struggling with the task of balancing the extent of patient autonomy and the state interest in preservation of life. In the rush to acknowledge the quality of life, the sanctity of life must not be discarded. Comprehensive legal reform in this area must strengthen the legal rights and obligations of both patients, their families and physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025485413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025485413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2121893

AN - SCOPUS:0025485413

VL - 77

SP - 821

EP - 828

JO - The Journal of the Florida Medical Association

JF - The Journal of the Florida Medical Association

SN - 0015-4148

IS - 9

ER -