Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?

John Ryan, Fermin Leguen, Barry D. Weiss, Sonya Albury, Terri Jennings, Fulton Velez, Nadia Salibi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If health providers are aware of their patients' literacy skills, they can more appropriately tailor their communication with patients. Few providers, however, assess patient's literacy skills for fear of offending patients, but no research has ever determined if patients object to such assessments. Our objectives were to determine the percentage of patients seen for routine health care that would agree to undergo literacy assessment and if satisfaction of patients differs in practices that perform literacy assessments versus practices that do not. We randomized 20 private and public medical practices to an intervention group that implemented literacy assessments with the Newest Vital Sign and a control group that did not. For intervention practices, we noted the percentage of patients agreeing to undergo the assessment. For both intervention and control practices, we assessed patient satisfaction. Of 289 patients asked to undergo literacy assessment in the intervention practices, 284 (98.3%) agreed to do so, including 125 (46.1%) with low or possibly low literacy skills. There was no difference in satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group. We conclude that patients are willing to undergo literacy assessments during routine office visits and performing such assessments does not decrease patient satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-611
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Education Research
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Fingerprint

literacy
Patient Satisfaction
Group
Literacy
Office Visits
Control Groups
medical practice
Vital Signs
Fear
health care
anxiety
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
communication
health
Health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Ryan, J., Leguen, F., Weiss, B. D., Albury, S., Jennings, T., Velez, F., & Salibi, N. (2008). Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice? Health Education Research, 23(4), 603-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym051

Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice? / Ryan, John; Leguen, Fermin; Weiss, Barry D.; Albury, Sonya; Jennings, Terri; Velez, Fulton; Salibi, Nadia.

In: Health Education Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.08.2008, p. 603-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryan, J, Leguen, F, Weiss, BD, Albury, S, Jennings, T, Velez, F & Salibi, N 2008, 'Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?', Health Education Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 603-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym051
Ryan, John ; Leguen, Fermin ; Weiss, Barry D. ; Albury, Sonya ; Jennings, Terri ; Velez, Fulton ; Salibi, Nadia. / Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?. In: Health Education Research. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 603-611.
@article{e15f4c95299c4aa1a6c6af4ea9886c18,
title = "Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?",
abstract = "If health providers are aware of their patients' literacy skills, they can more appropriately tailor their communication with patients. Few providers, however, assess patient's literacy skills for fear of offending patients, but no research has ever determined if patients object to such assessments. Our objectives were to determine the percentage of patients seen for routine health care that would agree to undergo literacy assessment and if satisfaction of patients differs in practices that perform literacy assessments versus practices that do not. We randomized 20 private and public medical practices to an intervention group that implemented literacy assessments with the Newest Vital Sign and a control group that did not. For intervention practices, we noted the percentage of patients agreeing to undergo the assessment. For both intervention and control practices, we assessed patient satisfaction. Of 289 patients asked to undergo literacy assessment in the intervention practices, 284 (98.3{\%}) agreed to do so, including 125 (46.1{\%}) with low or possibly low literacy skills. There was no difference in satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group. We conclude that patients are willing to undergo literacy assessments during routine office visits and performing such assessments does not decrease patient satisfaction.",
author = "John Ryan and Fermin Leguen and Weiss, {Barry D.} and Sonya Albury and Terri Jennings and Fulton Velez and Nadia Salibi",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/her/cym051",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "603--611",
journal = "Health Education Research",
issn = "0268-1153",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?

AU - Ryan, John

AU - Leguen, Fermin

AU - Weiss, Barry D.

AU - Albury, Sonya

AU - Jennings, Terri

AU - Velez, Fulton

AU - Salibi, Nadia

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - If health providers are aware of their patients' literacy skills, they can more appropriately tailor their communication with patients. Few providers, however, assess patient's literacy skills for fear of offending patients, but no research has ever determined if patients object to such assessments. Our objectives were to determine the percentage of patients seen for routine health care that would agree to undergo literacy assessment and if satisfaction of patients differs in practices that perform literacy assessments versus practices that do not. We randomized 20 private and public medical practices to an intervention group that implemented literacy assessments with the Newest Vital Sign and a control group that did not. For intervention practices, we noted the percentage of patients agreeing to undergo the assessment. For both intervention and control practices, we assessed patient satisfaction. Of 289 patients asked to undergo literacy assessment in the intervention practices, 284 (98.3%) agreed to do so, including 125 (46.1%) with low or possibly low literacy skills. There was no difference in satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group. We conclude that patients are willing to undergo literacy assessments during routine office visits and performing such assessments does not decrease patient satisfaction.

AB - If health providers are aware of their patients' literacy skills, they can more appropriately tailor their communication with patients. Few providers, however, assess patient's literacy skills for fear of offending patients, but no research has ever determined if patients object to such assessments. Our objectives were to determine the percentage of patients seen for routine health care that would agree to undergo literacy assessment and if satisfaction of patients differs in practices that perform literacy assessments versus practices that do not. We randomized 20 private and public medical practices to an intervention group that implemented literacy assessments with the Newest Vital Sign and a control group that did not. For intervention practices, we noted the percentage of patients agreeing to undergo the assessment. For both intervention and control practices, we assessed patient satisfaction. Of 289 patients asked to undergo literacy assessment in the intervention practices, 284 (98.3%) agreed to do so, including 125 (46.1%) with low or possibly low literacy skills. There was no difference in satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group. We conclude that patients are willing to undergo literacy assessments during routine office visits and performing such assessments does not decrease patient satisfaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47249126130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47249126130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/her/cym051

DO - 10.1093/her/cym051

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 603

EP - 611

JO - Health Education Research

JF - Health Education Research

SN - 0268-1153

IS - 4

ER -