Why Is Multiculturalism Good?

Blaine Fowers, Frank C. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

160 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the moral sources that give multiculturalism the potency to move psychology to reassess itself. The power of the multicultural perspective appears to derive from its ability to show how psychology's tendency toward monocultural universalism has undermined its aims as a science of human behavior and a promoter of human welfare. The multicultural critique also draws on Euro-American moral traditions and ideals, such as individual rights, authenticity, respect, and tolerance. In spite of the importance of these ideals, multiculturalists often criticize Euro-American culture without acknowledging their debt to it. Moreover, these particularist moral sources undercut multiculturalism's universalist appeal. There is a paradoxical tendency among some advocates ofmulticulturalism to encourage cultural separatism and an inarticulateness in dealing with intercultural value conflict. We present some recommendations for dealing with these dilemmas from philosophical hermeneutics, including the contextualization of multiculturalism, an approach to sifting and evaluating cultural values, and an ontological account of the dialogical nature of humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-621
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume51
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 1996

Fingerprint

Cultural Diversity
Psychology
Aptitude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Fowers, B., & Richardson, F. C. (1996). Why Is Multiculturalism Good? American Psychologist, 51(6), 609-621.

Why Is Multiculturalism Good? / Fowers, Blaine; Richardson, Frank C.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 51, No. 6, 01.06.1996, p. 609-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fowers, B & Richardson, FC 1996, 'Why Is Multiculturalism Good?', American Psychologist, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 609-621.
Fowers B, Richardson FC. Why Is Multiculturalism Good? American Psychologist. 1996 Jun 1;51(6):609-621.
Fowers, Blaine ; Richardson, Frank C. / Why Is Multiculturalism Good?. In: American Psychologist. 1996 ; Vol. 51, No. 6. pp. 609-621.
@article{86963a1f8c834ae688fa1c67ec532acd,
title = "Why Is Multiculturalism Good?",
abstract = "This article explores the moral sources that give multiculturalism the potency to move psychology to reassess itself. The power of the multicultural perspective appears to derive from its ability to show how psychology's tendency toward monocultural universalism has undermined its aims as a science of human behavior and a promoter of human welfare. The multicultural critique also draws on Euro-American moral traditions and ideals, such as individual rights, authenticity, respect, and tolerance. In spite of the importance of these ideals, multiculturalists often criticize Euro-American culture without acknowledging their debt to it. Moreover, these particularist moral sources undercut multiculturalism's universalist appeal. There is a paradoxical tendency among some advocates ofmulticulturalism to encourage cultural separatism and an inarticulateness in dealing with intercultural value conflict. We present some recommendations for dealing with these dilemmas from philosophical hermeneutics, including the contextualization of multiculturalism, an approach to sifting and evaluating cultural values, and an ontological account of the dialogical nature of humans.",
author = "Blaine Fowers and Richardson, {Frank C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "609--621",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Is Multiculturalism Good?

AU - Fowers, Blaine

AU - Richardson, Frank C.

PY - 1996/6/1

Y1 - 1996/6/1

N2 - This article explores the moral sources that give multiculturalism the potency to move psychology to reassess itself. The power of the multicultural perspective appears to derive from its ability to show how psychology's tendency toward monocultural universalism has undermined its aims as a science of human behavior and a promoter of human welfare. The multicultural critique also draws on Euro-American moral traditions and ideals, such as individual rights, authenticity, respect, and tolerance. In spite of the importance of these ideals, multiculturalists often criticize Euro-American culture without acknowledging their debt to it. Moreover, these particularist moral sources undercut multiculturalism's universalist appeal. There is a paradoxical tendency among some advocates ofmulticulturalism to encourage cultural separatism and an inarticulateness in dealing with intercultural value conflict. We present some recommendations for dealing with these dilemmas from philosophical hermeneutics, including the contextualization of multiculturalism, an approach to sifting and evaluating cultural values, and an ontological account of the dialogical nature of humans.

AB - This article explores the moral sources that give multiculturalism the potency to move psychology to reassess itself. The power of the multicultural perspective appears to derive from its ability to show how psychology's tendency toward monocultural universalism has undermined its aims as a science of human behavior and a promoter of human welfare. The multicultural critique also draws on Euro-American moral traditions and ideals, such as individual rights, authenticity, respect, and tolerance. In spite of the importance of these ideals, multiculturalists often criticize Euro-American culture without acknowledging their debt to it. Moreover, these particularist moral sources undercut multiculturalism's universalist appeal. There is a paradoxical tendency among some advocates ofmulticulturalism to encourage cultural separatism and an inarticulateness in dealing with intercultural value conflict. We present some recommendations for dealing with these dilemmas from philosophical hermeneutics, including the contextualization of multiculturalism, an approach to sifting and evaluating cultural values, and an ontological account of the dialogical nature of humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000486584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000486584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000486584

VL - 51

SP - 609

EP - 621

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 6

ER -