Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study

Mary Ganguli, Ching Wen Lee, Tiffany Hughes, Beth E. Snitz, Jennifer Jakubcak, Ranjan Duara, Chung Chou H Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neuroimaging research is usually conducted in volunteers who meet a priori selection criteria. Selection/volunteer bias is assumed but cannot be assessed. During an ongoing population-based cohort study of 1982 older adults, we asked 1702 active participants about their interest in undergoing a research brain scan. Compared with those not interested, the 915 potentially interested individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be male, better educated, generally healthier, and more likely to be cognitively intact and dementia-free. In 48 of the interested individuals, we conducted a previously reported pilot structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) study modelling mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. normal cognition, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 vs. CDR = 0, as a function of sMRI atrophy ratings. We now compare these 48 individuals (1) with all interested participants, to assess selection bias; (2) with all who had been asked about their interest, to assess volunteer bias; and (3) with the entire study cohort, to assess attrition bias from those who had dropped out before the question was asked. Using these data in propensity score models, we generated weights which we applied to logistic regression models reanalyzing the data from the pilot sMRI study. These weighted models adjusted, in turn, for selection bias, interest/volunteer bias, and attrition bias. They show fewer regions of interest to be associated with MCI/ CDR than were in the original unweighted models. When study participants are drawn from a well-characterized population, they can be compared with non-participants, and the information used to correct study results for potential bias and thus provide more generalizable estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-212
Number of pages9
JournalBrain Imaging and Behavior
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 27 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dementia
Selection Bias
Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain
Population
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Propensity Score
Research
Neuroimaging
Cognition
Patient Selection
Atrophy
Weights and Measures
Cognitive Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Propensity scores
  • Standard error
  • Survey sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study. / Ganguli, Mary; Lee, Ching Wen; Hughes, Tiffany; Snitz, Beth E.; Jakubcak, Jennifer; Duara, Ranjan; Chang, Chung Chou H.

In: Brain Imaging and Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 2, 27.02.2014, p. 204-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganguli, Mary ; Lee, Ching Wen ; Hughes, Tiffany ; Snitz, Beth E. ; Jakubcak, Jennifer ; Duara, Ranjan ; Chang, Chung Chou H. / Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study. In: Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 204-212.
@article{f9a46cce89d14af3a56d946e6ab024a6,
title = "Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study",
abstract = "Neuroimaging research is usually conducted in volunteers who meet a priori selection criteria. Selection/volunteer bias is assumed but cannot be assessed. During an ongoing population-based cohort study of 1982 older adults, we asked 1702 active participants about their interest in undergoing a research brain scan. Compared with those not interested, the 915 potentially interested individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be male, better educated, generally healthier, and more likely to be cognitively intact and dementia-free. In 48 of the interested individuals, we conducted a previously reported pilot structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) study modelling mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. normal cognition, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 vs. CDR = 0, as a function of sMRI atrophy ratings. We now compare these 48 individuals (1) with all interested participants, to assess selection bias; (2) with all who had been asked about their interest, to assess volunteer bias; and (3) with the entire study cohort, to assess attrition bias from those who had dropped out before the question was asked. Using these data in propensity score models, we generated weights which we applied to logistic regression models reanalyzing the data from the pilot sMRI study. These weighted models adjusted, in turn, for selection bias, interest/volunteer bias, and attrition bias. They show fewer regions of interest to be associated with MCI/ CDR than were in the original unweighted models. When study participants are drawn from a well-characterized population, they can be compared with non-participants, and the information used to correct study results for potential bias and thus provide more generalizable estimates.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Propensity scores, Standard error, Survey sampling",
author = "Mary Ganguli and Lee, {Ching Wen} and Tiffany Hughes and Snitz, {Beth E.} and Jennifer Jakubcak and Ranjan Duara and Chang, {Chung Chou H}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1007/s11682-014-9297-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "204--212",
journal = "Brain Imaging and Behavior",
issn = "1931-7557",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study

AU - Ganguli, Mary

AU - Lee, Ching Wen

AU - Hughes, Tiffany

AU - Snitz, Beth E.

AU - Jakubcak, Jennifer

AU - Duara, Ranjan

AU - Chang, Chung Chou H

PY - 2014/2/27

Y1 - 2014/2/27

N2 - Neuroimaging research is usually conducted in volunteers who meet a priori selection criteria. Selection/volunteer bias is assumed but cannot be assessed. During an ongoing population-based cohort study of 1982 older adults, we asked 1702 active participants about their interest in undergoing a research brain scan. Compared with those not interested, the 915 potentially interested individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be male, better educated, generally healthier, and more likely to be cognitively intact and dementia-free. In 48 of the interested individuals, we conducted a previously reported pilot structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) study modelling mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. normal cognition, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 vs. CDR = 0, as a function of sMRI atrophy ratings. We now compare these 48 individuals (1) with all interested participants, to assess selection bias; (2) with all who had been asked about their interest, to assess volunteer bias; and (3) with the entire study cohort, to assess attrition bias from those who had dropped out before the question was asked. Using these data in propensity score models, we generated weights which we applied to logistic regression models reanalyzing the data from the pilot sMRI study. These weighted models adjusted, in turn, for selection bias, interest/volunteer bias, and attrition bias. They show fewer regions of interest to be associated with MCI/ CDR than were in the original unweighted models. When study participants are drawn from a well-characterized population, they can be compared with non-participants, and the information used to correct study results for potential bias and thus provide more generalizable estimates.

AB - Neuroimaging research is usually conducted in volunteers who meet a priori selection criteria. Selection/volunteer bias is assumed but cannot be assessed. During an ongoing population-based cohort study of 1982 older adults, we asked 1702 active participants about their interest in undergoing a research brain scan. Compared with those not interested, the 915 potentially interested individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be male, better educated, generally healthier, and more likely to be cognitively intact and dementia-free. In 48 of the interested individuals, we conducted a previously reported pilot structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) study modelling mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. normal cognition, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 vs. CDR = 0, as a function of sMRI atrophy ratings. We now compare these 48 individuals (1) with all interested participants, to assess selection bias; (2) with all who had been asked about their interest, to assess volunteer bias; and (3) with the entire study cohort, to assess attrition bias from those who had dropped out before the question was asked. Using these data in propensity score models, we generated weights which we applied to logistic regression models reanalyzing the data from the pilot sMRI study. These weighted models adjusted, in turn, for selection bias, interest/volunteer bias, and attrition bias. They show fewer regions of interest to be associated with MCI/ CDR than were in the original unweighted models. When study participants are drawn from a well-characterized population, they can be compared with non-participants, and the information used to correct study results for potential bias and thus provide more generalizable estimates.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Propensity scores

KW - Standard error

KW - Survey sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929943597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929943597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11682-014-9297-9

DO - 10.1007/s11682-014-9297-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929943597

VL - 9

SP - 204

EP - 212

JO - Brain Imaging and Behavior

JF - Brain Imaging and Behavior

SN - 1931-7557

IS - 2

ER -