Whistleblowing Policies in American States: A Nationwide Analysis

Jonathan P. West, James S. Bowman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

American states have statutes with whistleblowing protection provisions for employees. These laws may focus on the duty to divulge misconduct, procedures for reporting disclosures, and protection from retaliation. The research question is, “What is the scope, content, and perceived effectiveness of these provisions?” The premise is that they have value, albeit uncertain, in the practice of public administration. To investigate this subject area, documentary and attitudinal data were gathered. This article presents the results of the first comprehensive study of state-level whistleblowing provisions. The importance of this work is evident for two reasons. First, though corruption varies across state lines, overall it is common. Second, given the low visibility and high complexity of organizational activities, detection of abuse rests in large part with the workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

retaliation
public administration
statute
corruption
abuse
employee
Law
Values
Whistle blowing
Workforce
Disclosure
Corruption
Public Administration
Employees
Visibility
Retaliation
Statute
Abuse

Keywords

  • ethics codes
  • state laws
  • whistleblower protection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Whistleblowing Policies in American States : A Nationwide Analysis. / West, Jonathan P.; Bowman, James S.

In: American Review of Public Administration, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46ce671560a34820a31495f0853c607a,
title = "Whistleblowing Policies in American States: A Nationwide Analysis",
abstract = "American states have statutes with whistleblowing protection provisions for employees. These laws may focus on the duty to divulge misconduct, procedures for reporting disclosures, and protection from retaliation. The research question is, “What is the scope, content, and perceived effectiveness of these provisions?” The premise is that they have value, albeit uncertain, in the practice of public administration. To investigate this subject area, documentary and attitudinal data were gathered. This article presents the results of the first comprehensive study of state-level whistleblowing provisions. The importance of this work is evident for two reasons. First, though corruption varies across state lines, overall it is common. Second, given the low visibility and high complexity of organizational activities, detection of abuse rests in large part with the workforce.",
keywords = "ethics codes, state laws, whistleblower protection",
author = "West, {Jonathan P.} and Bowman, {James S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074019885629",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whistleblowing Policies in American States

T2 - A Nationwide Analysis

AU - West, Jonathan P.

AU - Bowman, James S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - American states have statutes with whistleblowing protection provisions for employees. These laws may focus on the duty to divulge misconduct, procedures for reporting disclosures, and protection from retaliation. The research question is, “What is the scope, content, and perceived effectiveness of these provisions?” The premise is that they have value, albeit uncertain, in the practice of public administration. To investigate this subject area, documentary and attitudinal data were gathered. This article presents the results of the first comprehensive study of state-level whistleblowing provisions. The importance of this work is evident for two reasons. First, though corruption varies across state lines, overall it is common. Second, given the low visibility and high complexity of organizational activities, detection of abuse rests in large part with the workforce.

AB - American states have statutes with whistleblowing protection provisions for employees. These laws may focus on the duty to divulge misconduct, procedures for reporting disclosures, and protection from retaliation. The research question is, “What is the scope, content, and perceived effectiveness of these provisions?” The premise is that they have value, albeit uncertain, in the practice of public administration. To investigate this subject area, documentary and attitudinal data were gathered. This article presents the results of the first comprehensive study of state-level whistleblowing provisions. The importance of this work is evident for two reasons. First, though corruption varies across state lines, overall it is common. Second, given the low visibility and high complexity of organizational activities, detection of abuse rests in large part with the workforce.

KW - ethics codes

KW - state laws

KW - whistleblower protection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074845612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074845612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074019885629

DO - 10.1177/0275074019885629

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074845612

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

ER -