Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words

Bodo Winter, Marcus Perlman, Lynn Perry, Gary Lupyan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some spoken words are iconic, exhibiting a resemblance between form and meaning. We used native speaker ratings to assess the iconicity of 3001 English words, analyzing their iconicity in relation to part-of-speech differences and differences between the sensory domain they relate to (sight, sound, touch, taste and smell). First, we replicated previous findings showing that onomatopoeia and interjections were highest in iconicity, followed by verbs and adjectives, and then nouns and grammatical words. We further show that words with meanings related to the senses are more iconic than words with abstract meanings. Moreover, iconicity is not distributed equally across sensory modalities: Auditory and tactile words tend to be more iconic than words denoting concepts related to taste, smell and sight. Last, we examined the relationship between iconicity (resemblance between form and meaning) and systematicity (statistical regularity between form and meaning). We find that iconicity in English words is more strongly related to sensory meanings than systematicity. Altogether, our results shed light on the extent and distribution of iconicity in modern English.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-451
Number of pages22
JournalInteraction Studies
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

smell
Acoustic waves
touch (sensation)
regularity
Iconic
Iconicity
rating

Keywords

  • Onomatopoeia
  • Perception
  • Sound
  • Sound symbolism
  • Touch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. / Winter, Bodo; Perlman, Marcus; Perry, Lynn; Lupyan, Gary.

In: Interaction Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 430-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winter, Bodo ; Perlman, Marcus ; Perry, Lynn ; Lupyan, Gary. / Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. In: Interaction Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 430-451.
@article{895429adb2134e709fb8e0360d859c07,
title = "Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words",
abstract = "Some spoken words are iconic, exhibiting a resemblance between form and meaning. We used native speaker ratings to assess the iconicity of 3001 English words, analyzing their iconicity in relation to part-of-speech differences and differences between the sensory domain they relate to (sight, sound, touch, taste and smell). First, we replicated previous findings showing that onomatopoeia and interjections were highest in iconicity, followed by verbs and adjectives, and then nouns and grammatical words. We further show that words with meanings related to the senses are more iconic than words with abstract meanings. Moreover, iconicity is not distributed equally across sensory modalities: Auditory and tactile words tend to be more iconic than words denoting concepts related to taste, smell and sight. Last, we examined the relationship between iconicity (resemblance between form and meaning) and systematicity (statistical regularity between form and meaning). We find that iconicity in English words is more strongly related to sensory meanings than systematicity. Altogether, our results shed light on the extent and distribution of iconicity in modern English.",
keywords = "Onomatopoeia, Perception, Sound, Sound symbolism, Touch",
author = "Bodo Winter and Marcus Perlman and Lynn Perry and Gary Lupyan",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/is.18.3.07win",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "430--451",
journal = "Interaction Studies",
issn = "1572-0373",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words

AU - Winter, Bodo

AU - Perlman, Marcus

AU - Perry, Lynn

AU - Lupyan, Gary

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Some spoken words are iconic, exhibiting a resemblance between form and meaning. We used native speaker ratings to assess the iconicity of 3001 English words, analyzing their iconicity in relation to part-of-speech differences and differences between the sensory domain they relate to (sight, sound, touch, taste and smell). First, we replicated previous findings showing that onomatopoeia and interjections were highest in iconicity, followed by verbs and adjectives, and then nouns and grammatical words. We further show that words with meanings related to the senses are more iconic than words with abstract meanings. Moreover, iconicity is not distributed equally across sensory modalities: Auditory and tactile words tend to be more iconic than words denoting concepts related to taste, smell and sight. Last, we examined the relationship between iconicity (resemblance between form and meaning) and systematicity (statistical regularity between form and meaning). We find that iconicity in English words is more strongly related to sensory meanings than systematicity. Altogether, our results shed light on the extent and distribution of iconicity in modern English.

AB - Some spoken words are iconic, exhibiting a resemblance between form and meaning. We used native speaker ratings to assess the iconicity of 3001 English words, analyzing their iconicity in relation to part-of-speech differences and differences between the sensory domain they relate to (sight, sound, touch, taste and smell). First, we replicated previous findings showing that onomatopoeia and interjections were highest in iconicity, followed by verbs and adjectives, and then nouns and grammatical words. We further show that words with meanings related to the senses are more iconic than words with abstract meanings. Moreover, iconicity is not distributed equally across sensory modalities: Auditory and tactile words tend to be more iconic than words denoting concepts related to taste, smell and sight. Last, we examined the relationship between iconicity (resemblance between form and meaning) and systematicity (statistical regularity between form and meaning). We find that iconicity in English words is more strongly related to sensory meanings than systematicity. Altogether, our results shed light on the extent and distribution of iconicity in modern English.

KW - Onomatopoeia

KW - Perception

KW - Sound

KW - Sound symbolism

KW - Touch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038373588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038373588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/is.18.3.07win

DO - 10.1075/is.18.3.07win

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038373588

VL - 18

SP - 430

EP - 451

JO - Interaction Studies

JF - Interaction Studies

SN - 1572-0373

IS - 3

ER -