Vote choice, ideology, and social dominance orientation influence preferences for lower pitched voices in political candidates

Lasse Laustsen, Michael Bang Petersen, Casey A Klofstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans are equipped with a psychological system of followership that evolved to regulate choices of leaders based partly on would-be leaders' physiological features. One such feature is voice pitch, which is determined by the physiology of the throat. Recent studies find that political candidates in modern elections with lower-pitched voices are generally more successful. As lower-pitched voices are perceived as stronger and more dominant, these findings have been taken to indicate a general preference for dispositional abilities in leaders to protect and prevail in conflicts. Here we extend upon these findings by demonstrating that conservatives and Republicans tend to view the world as much more competitive and threatening than liberals and Democrats. We utilize two existing data sources to show that political candidates with lower-pitched voices are preferred more among conservative Republicans than among liberal Democrats. In a third study we show that preferences for lower-pitched candidate voices stem from individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). Importantly, across all three studies subjects' party affiliation, ideology, and SDO only predict preferences for male candidate voices. We conclude with a discussion of the results in relation to followership psychology and general debates on the rationality of the public with respect to elections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalEvolutionary Psychology
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Social Dominance
Psychology
Aptitude
Information Storage and Retrieval
Pharynx
Individuality

Keywords

  • Political candidates
  • Political ideology
  • Social dominance orientation
  • Voice pitch
  • Voting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Vote choice, ideology, and social dominance orientation influence preferences for lower pitched voices in political candidates. / Laustsen, Lasse; Petersen, Michael Bang; Klofstad, Casey A.

In: Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2015, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{97bde0a2572846f585a126d849df0769,
title = "Vote choice, ideology, and social dominance orientation influence preferences for lower pitched voices in political candidates",
abstract = "Humans are equipped with a psychological system of followership that evolved to regulate choices of leaders based partly on would-be leaders' physiological features. One such feature is voice pitch, which is determined by the physiology of the throat. Recent studies find that political candidates in modern elections with lower-pitched voices are generally more successful. As lower-pitched voices are perceived as stronger and more dominant, these findings have been taken to indicate a general preference for dispositional abilities in leaders to protect and prevail in conflicts. Here we extend upon these findings by demonstrating that conservatives and Republicans tend to view the world as much more competitive and threatening than liberals and Democrats. We utilize two existing data sources to show that political candidates with lower-pitched voices are preferred more among conservative Republicans than among liberal Democrats. In a third study we show that preferences for lower-pitched candidate voices stem from individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). Importantly, across all three studies subjects' party affiliation, ideology, and SDO only predict preferences for male candidate voices. We conclude with a discussion of the results in relation to followership psychology and general debates on the rationality of the public with respect to elections.",
keywords = "Political candidates, Political ideology, Social dominance orientation, Voice pitch, Voting",
author = "Lasse Laustsen and Petersen, {Michael Bang} and Klofstad, {Casey A}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/1474704915600576",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Evolutionary Psychology",
issn = "1474-7049",
publisher = "Human Nature Review",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vote choice, ideology, and social dominance orientation influence preferences for lower pitched voices in political candidates

AU - Laustsen, Lasse

AU - Petersen, Michael Bang

AU - Klofstad, Casey A

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Humans are equipped with a psychological system of followership that evolved to regulate choices of leaders based partly on would-be leaders' physiological features. One such feature is voice pitch, which is determined by the physiology of the throat. Recent studies find that political candidates in modern elections with lower-pitched voices are generally more successful. As lower-pitched voices are perceived as stronger and more dominant, these findings have been taken to indicate a general preference for dispositional abilities in leaders to protect and prevail in conflicts. Here we extend upon these findings by demonstrating that conservatives and Republicans tend to view the world as much more competitive and threatening than liberals and Democrats. We utilize two existing data sources to show that political candidates with lower-pitched voices are preferred more among conservative Republicans than among liberal Democrats. In a third study we show that preferences for lower-pitched candidate voices stem from individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). Importantly, across all three studies subjects' party affiliation, ideology, and SDO only predict preferences for male candidate voices. We conclude with a discussion of the results in relation to followership psychology and general debates on the rationality of the public with respect to elections.

AB - Humans are equipped with a psychological system of followership that evolved to regulate choices of leaders based partly on would-be leaders' physiological features. One such feature is voice pitch, which is determined by the physiology of the throat. Recent studies find that political candidates in modern elections with lower-pitched voices are generally more successful. As lower-pitched voices are perceived as stronger and more dominant, these findings have been taken to indicate a general preference for dispositional abilities in leaders to protect and prevail in conflicts. Here we extend upon these findings by demonstrating that conservatives and Republicans tend to view the world as much more competitive and threatening than liberals and Democrats. We utilize two existing data sources to show that political candidates with lower-pitched voices are preferred more among conservative Republicans than among liberal Democrats. In a third study we show that preferences for lower-pitched candidate voices stem from individual differences in Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). Importantly, across all three studies subjects' party affiliation, ideology, and SDO only predict preferences for male candidate voices. We conclude with a discussion of the results in relation to followership psychology and general debates on the rationality of the public with respect to elections.

KW - Political candidates

KW - Political ideology

KW - Social dominance orientation

KW - Voice pitch

KW - Voting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946065002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946065002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1474704915600576

DO - 10.1177/1474704915600576

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84946065002

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Evolutionary Psychology

SN - 1474-7049

IS - 3

ER -