Voice and context in simulated everyday legal discourse: The influence of sex differences and social ties

Calvin Morrill, Michelle Johnson, Tyler R Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Everyday legal discourse refers to the spoken language with which ordinary people constitute the law-in-action. In this article, we experimentally investigate the social distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse found by ethnographers in small-claims court settings. We examine the influences of sex differences and social ties between disputants on these types of discourse in a mock small-claims setting using a quantitative content coding scheme. We do not find empirical support for sex differences in the production of simulated everyday legal discourse. The relational context of a dispute (operationalized as the strength of social ties between disputants) has significant effects on the distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse, so that disputants in relationally-close contexts produce more relationally-oriented discourse and those in relationally-distant contexts produce more rule-oriented discourses than those in relationally-close contexts. With these findings as a backdrop, we discuss (1) the contextual nature of sex differences in everyday legal discourse; (2) discourse "switching" and emotional investment in personal relationships, and (3) applications for our coding scheme to studies of disputing frames.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-665
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and Society Review
Volume32
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

discourse
coding
spoken language
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Voice and context in simulated everyday legal discourse : The influence of sex differences and social ties. / Morrill, Calvin; Johnson, Michelle; Harrison, Tyler R.

In: Law and Society Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1998, p. 639-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ee89970cd32470996afd99608bd717c,
title = "Voice and context in simulated everyday legal discourse: The influence of sex differences and social ties",
abstract = "Everyday legal discourse refers to the spoken language with which ordinary people constitute the law-in-action. In this article, we experimentally investigate the social distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse found by ethnographers in small-claims court settings. We examine the influences of sex differences and social ties between disputants on these types of discourse in a mock small-claims setting using a quantitative content coding scheme. We do not find empirical support for sex differences in the production of simulated everyday legal discourse. The relational context of a dispute (operationalized as the strength of social ties between disputants) has significant effects on the distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse, so that disputants in relationally-close contexts produce more relationally-oriented discourse and those in relationally-distant contexts produce more rule-oriented discourses than those in relationally-close contexts. With these findings as a backdrop, we discuss (1) the contextual nature of sex differences in everyday legal discourse; (2) discourse {"}switching{"} and emotional investment in personal relationships, and (3) applications for our coding scheme to studies of disputing frames.",
author = "Calvin Morrill and Michelle Johnson and Harrison, {Tyler R}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "639--665",
journal = "Law and Society Review",
issn = "0023-9216",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voice and context in simulated everyday legal discourse

T2 - The influence of sex differences and social ties

AU - Morrill, Calvin

AU - Johnson, Michelle

AU - Harrison, Tyler R

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Everyday legal discourse refers to the spoken language with which ordinary people constitute the law-in-action. In this article, we experimentally investigate the social distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse found by ethnographers in small-claims court settings. We examine the influences of sex differences and social ties between disputants on these types of discourse in a mock small-claims setting using a quantitative content coding scheme. We do not find empirical support for sex differences in the production of simulated everyday legal discourse. The relational context of a dispute (operationalized as the strength of social ties between disputants) has significant effects on the distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse, so that disputants in relationally-close contexts produce more relationally-oriented discourse and those in relationally-distant contexts produce more rule-oriented discourses than those in relationally-close contexts. With these findings as a backdrop, we discuss (1) the contextual nature of sex differences in everyday legal discourse; (2) discourse "switching" and emotional investment in personal relationships, and (3) applications for our coding scheme to studies of disputing frames.

AB - Everyday legal discourse refers to the spoken language with which ordinary people constitute the law-in-action. In this article, we experimentally investigate the social distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse found by ethnographers in small-claims court settings. We examine the influences of sex differences and social ties between disputants on these types of discourse in a mock small-claims setting using a quantitative content coding scheme. We do not find empirical support for sex differences in the production of simulated everyday legal discourse. The relational context of a dispute (operationalized as the strength of social ties between disputants) has significant effects on the distribution of rule-and relationally-oriented discourse, so that disputants in relationally-close contexts produce more relationally-oriented discourse and those in relationally-distant contexts produce more rule-oriented discourses than those in relationally-close contexts. With these findings as a backdrop, we discuss (1) the contextual nature of sex differences in everyday legal discourse; (2) discourse "switching" and emotional investment in personal relationships, and (3) applications for our coding scheme to studies of disputing frames.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032260955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032260955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032260955

VL - 32

SP - 639

EP - 665

JO - Law and Society Review

JF - Law and Society Review

SN - 0023-9216

IS - 3

ER -