Vascular Access for Placement of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters for Hemodialysis: A Systematic Approach and Clinical Practice Algorithm

Keith Pereira, Adam Osiason, Jason Salsamendi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of interventional radiology in the overall management of patients on dialysis continues to expand. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the use of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) for hemodialysis has become an integral component of treatment plans. Unfortunately, long-term use of TDCs often leads to infections, acute occlusions, and chronic venous stenosis, depletion of the patient′s conventional access routes, and prevention of their recanalization. In such situations, the progressive loss of venous access sites prompts a systematic approach to alternative sites to maximize patient survival and minimize complications. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each vascular access option. We illustrate the procedures with case histories and images from our own experience at a highly active dialysis and transplant center. We rank each vascular access option and classify them into tiers based on their relative degrees of effectiveness. The conventional approaches are the most preferred, followed by alternative approaches and finally the salvage approaches. It is our intent to have this review serve as a concise and informative reference for physicians managing patients who need vascular access for hemodialysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number31
JournalJournal of Clinical Imaging Science
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Catheters
Interventional Radiology
Chronic Kidney Failure
Pathologic Constriction
Physicians
Transplants
Survival
Infection
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • End-stage renal disease
  • hemodialysis
  • tunneled dialysis catheters
  • vascular access

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{af345069f27a430e86e4f3b02d547a06,
title = "Vascular Access for Placement of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters for Hemodialysis: A Systematic Approach and Clinical Practice Algorithm",
abstract = "The role of interventional radiology in the overall management of patients on dialysis continues to expand. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the use of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) for hemodialysis has become an integral component of treatment plans. Unfortunately, long-term use of TDCs often leads to infections, acute occlusions, and chronic venous stenosis, depletion of the patient′s conventional access routes, and prevention of their recanalization. In such situations, the progressive loss of venous access sites prompts a systematic approach to alternative sites to maximize patient survival and minimize complications. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each vascular access option. We illustrate the procedures with case histories and images from our own experience at a highly active dialysis and transplant center. We rank each vascular access option and classify them into tiers based on their relative degrees of effectiveness. The conventional approaches are the most preferred, followed by alternative approaches and finally the salvage approaches. It is our intent to have this review serve as a concise and informative reference for physicians managing patients who need vascular access for hemodialysis.",
keywords = "End-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, tunneled dialysis catheters, vascular access",
author = "Keith Pereira and Adam Osiason and Jason Salsamendi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/2156-7514.157858",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Imaging Science",
issn = "2156-7514",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vascular Access for Placement of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters for Hemodialysis

T2 - A Systematic Approach and Clinical Practice Algorithm

AU - Pereira, Keith

AU - Osiason, Adam

AU - Salsamendi, Jason

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The role of interventional radiology in the overall management of patients on dialysis continues to expand. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the use of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) for hemodialysis has become an integral component of treatment plans. Unfortunately, long-term use of TDCs often leads to infections, acute occlusions, and chronic venous stenosis, depletion of the patient′s conventional access routes, and prevention of their recanalization. In such situations, the progressive loss of venous access sites prompts a systematic approach to alternative sites to maximize patient survival and minimize complications. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each vascular access option. We illustrate the procedures with case histories and images from our own experience at a highly active dialysis and transplant center. We rank each vascular access option and classify them into tiers based on their relative degrees of effectiveness. The conventional approaches are the most preferred, followed by alternative approaches and finally the salvage approaches. It is our intent to have this review serve as a concise and informative reference for physicians managing patients who need vascular access for hemodialysis.

AB - The role of interventional radiology in the overall management of patients on dialysis continues to expand. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the use of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) for hemodialysis has become an integral component of treatment plans. Unfortunately, long-term use of TDCs often leads to infections, acute occlusions, and chronic venous stenosis, depletion of the patient′s conventional access routes, and prevention of their recanalization. In such situations, the progressive loss of venous access sites prompts a systematic approach to alternative sites to maximize patient survival and minimize complications. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each vascular access option. We illustrate the procedures with case histories and images from our own experience at a highly active dialysis and transplant center. We rank each vascular access option and classify them into tiers based on their relative degrees of effectiveness. The conventional approaches are the most preferred, followed by alternative approaches and finally the salvage approaches. It is our intent to have this review serve as a concise and informative reference for physicians managing patients who need vascular access for hemodialysis.

KW - End-stage renal disease

KW - hemodialysis

KW - tunneled dialysis catheters

KW - vascular access

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940842203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940842203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/2156-7514.157858

DO - 10.4103/2156-7514.157858

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940842203

VL - 5

JO - Journal of Clinical Imaging Science

JF - Journal of Clinical Imaging Science

SN - 2156-7514

IS - 1

M1 - 31

ER -