Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury

Sarah A. Eidelson, Joshua Parreco, Michelle B. Mulder, Arjuna Dharmaraja, Joyce I. Kaufman, Kenneth G. Proctor, Louis R. Pizano, Carl I. Schulman, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Rattan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A significant proportion of readmissions occurs at a different hospital than the index admission, and is thus missed by current quality metrics. No study has examined all-hospital adult 30-day readmission rates, including different hospitals, following burn injury across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide readmission rates, potential risk factors, and ultimately the burden of burn injury readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. The 2010–2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients admitted for burn. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors and associated cost for 30-day readmission at index and different hospitals. There were 94,759 patients admitted during the study period, with 7.4% (n = 7000) readmitted and of those, 29.2% (n = 2047) readmitted to a different hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection (29.4% [n = 1990]). Risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission to any hospital included burn of lower limbs (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, [1.21–1.37], P < .01), third degree burns (OR 1.31, [1.22–1.41], P < .01), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR 1.48, [1.37–1.60], P < .01), depression (OR 1.30, [1.19–1.41], P < .01), and psychoses (OR 1.53, [1.40–1.67], P < .01). Risk factors unique to readmission to a different hospital included: length of stay greater than 7 days (OR 2.07, [1.78–2.40], P < 0.01), and initial admission to a metropolitan teaching hospital (OR 1.50, [1.26–1.78], P < .01). Previously unreported, one in three burn readmissions nationally occur at a different hospital, have unique risk factors, and are costlier. Current hospital benchmarking underestimates readmission by failing to capture this unique subpopulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Odds Ratio
Benchmarking
Urban Hospitals
Burns
Teaching Hospitals
Psychotic Disorders
Comorbidity
Lower Extremity
Length of Stay
Logistic Models
Databases
Depression
Costs and Cost Analysis
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Eidelson, S. A., Parreco, J., Mulder, M. B., Dharmaraja, A., Kaufman, J. I., Proctor, K. G., ... Rattan, R. (2018). Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iry034

Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury. / Eidelson, Sarah A.; Parreco, Joshua; Mulder, Michelle B.; Dharmaraja, Arjuna; Kaufman, Joyce I.; Proctor, Kenneth G.; Pizano, Louis R.; Schulman, Carl I.; Namias, Nicholas; Rattan, Rishi.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eidelson, Sarah A. ; Parreco, Joshua ; Mulder, Michelle B. ; Dharmaraja, Arjuna ; Kaufman, Joyce I. ; Proctor, Kenneth G. ; Pizano, Louis R. ; Schulman, Carl I. ; Namias, Nicholas ; Rattan, Rishi. / Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 5.
@article{cbf7f1d56c2e4775b6ca5e3e6219a866,
title = "Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury",
abstract = "A significant proportion of readmissions occurs at a different hospital than the index admission, and is thus missed by current quality metrics. No study has examined all-hospital adult 30-day readmission rates, including different hospitals, following burn injury across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide readmission rates, potential risk factors, and ultimately the burden of burn injury readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. The 2010–2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients admitted for burn. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors and associated cost for 30-day readmission at index and different hospitals. There were 94,759 patients admitted during the study period, with 7.4{\%} (n = 7000) readmitted and of those, 29.2{\%} (n = 2047) readmitted to a different hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection (29.4{\%} [n = 1990]). Risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission to any hospital included burn of lower limbs (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, [1.21–1.37], P < .01), third degree burns (OR 1.31, [1.22–1.41], P < .01), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR 1.48, [1.37–1.60], P < .01), depression (OR 1.30, [1.19–1.41], P < .01), and psychoses (OR 1.53, [1.40–1.67], P < .01). Risk factors unique to readmission to a different hospital included: length of stay greater than 7 days (OR 2.07, [1.78–2.40], P < 0.01), and initial admission to a metropolitan teaching hospital (OR 1.50, [1.26–1.78], P < .01). Previously unreported, one in three burn readmissions nationally occur at a different hospital, have unique risk factors, and are costlier. Current hospital benchmarking underestimates readmission by failing to capture this unique subpopulation.",
author = "Eidelson, {Sarah A.} and Joshua Parreco and Mulder, {Michelle B.} and Arjuna Dharmaraja and Kaufman, {Joyce I.} and Proctor, {Kenneth G.} and Pizano, {Louis R.} and Schulman, {Carl I.} and Nicholas Namias and Rishi Rattan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/iry034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in national readmission patterns after burn injury

AU - Eidelson, Sarah A.

AU - Parreco, Joshua

AU - Mulder, Michelle B.

AU - Dharmaraja, Arjuna

AU - Kaufman, Joyce I.

AU - Proctor, Kenneth G.

AU - Pizano, Louis R.

AU - Schulman, Carl I.

AU - Namias, Nicholas

AU - Rattan, Rishi

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A significant proportion of readmissions occurs at a different hospital than the index admission, and is thus missed by current quality metrics. No study has examined all-hospital adult 30-day readmission rates, including different hospitals, following burn injury across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide readmission rates, potential risk factors, and ultimately the burden of burn injury readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. The 2010–2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients admitted for burn. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors and associated cost for 30-day readmission at index and different hospitals. There were 94,759 patients admitted during the study period, with 7.4% (n = 7000) readmitted and of those, 29.2% (n = 2047) readmitted to a different hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection (29.4% [n = 1990]). Risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission to any hospital included burn of lower limbs (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, [1.21–1.37], P < .01), third degree burns (OR 1.31, [1.22–1.41], P < .01), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR 1.48, [1.37–1.60], P < .01), depression (OR 1.30, [1.19–1.41], P < .01), and psychoses (OR 1.53, [1.40–1.67], P < .01). Risk factors unique to readmission to a different hospital included: length of stay greater than 7 days (OR 2.07, [1.78–2.40], P < 0.01), and initial admission to a metropolitan teaching hospital (OR 1.50, [1.26–1.78], P < .01). Previously unreported, one in three burn readmissions nationally occur at a different hospital, have unique risk factors, and are costlier. Current hospital benchmarking underestimates readmission by failing to capture this unique subpopulation.

AB - A significant proportion of readmissions occurs at a different hospital than the index admission, and is thus missed by current quality metrics. No study has examined all-hospital adult 30-day readmission rates, including different hospitals, following burn injury across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide readmission rates, potential risk factors, and ultimately the burden of burn injury readmission, including readmission to a different hospital. The 2010–2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients admitted for burn. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors and associated cost for 30-day readmission at index and different hospitals. There were 94,759 patients admitted during the study period, with 7.4% (n = 7000) readmitted and of those, 29.2% (n = 2047) readmitted to a different hospital. The most common reason for readmission was infection (29.4% [n = 1990]). Risk factors for unplanned 30-day readmission to any hospital included burn of lower limbs (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, [1.21–1.37], P < .01), third degree burns (OR 1.31, [1.22–1.41], P < .01), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR 1.48, [1.37–1.60], P < .01), depression (OR 1.30, [1.19–1.41], P < .01), and psychoses (OR 1.53, [1.40–1.67], P < .01). Risk factors unique to readmission to a different hospital included: length of stay greater than 7 days (OR 2.07, [1.78–2.40], P < 0.01), and initial admission to a metropolitan teaching hospital (OR 1.50, [1.26–1.78], P < .01). Previously unreported, one in three burn readmissions nationally occur at a different hospital, have unique risk factors, and are costlier. Current hospital benchmarking underestimates readmission by failing to capture this unique subpopulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055671107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055671107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iry034

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iry034

M3 - Article

C2 - 29931160

AN - SCOPUS:85055671107

VL - 39

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 5

ER -