Values, Assumptions, and Practices: Assessing the Moral Implications of Psychological Discourse and Action

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

251 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite an increased awareness concerning the role of values in psychology, psychologists lack clear guidelines to appraise the moral implications of their work. To address this discrepancy, the author proposes a framework for examining the moral dimensions of psychological discourse and practice. The framework contains 3 central elements: values, assumptions, and practices. These components may be used to articulate and to challenge the ethical, social, and political implications of theories and practices. To illustrate its applicability, the framework is used to evaluate the moral propositions of traditional, empowering, postmodern, and emancipatory communitarian approaches. The author concludes with a vision for addressing the shortcomings of predominant models by proposing for psychology an emancipatory communitarian approach that promotes the emancipation of vulnerable individuals and that fosters a balance among the values of self-determination, caring and compassion, collaboration and democratic participation, human diversity, and distributive justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-535
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume52
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Personal Autonomy
Social Justice
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Values, Assumptions, and Practices : Assessing the Moral Implications of Psychological Discourse and Action. / Prilleltensky, Isaac.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 52, No. 5, 01.05.1997, p. 517-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d5299bf7f5c4b6b97bde89cc2f4f248,
title = "Values, Assumptions, and Practices: Assessing the Moral Implications of Psychological Discourse and Action",
abstract = "Despite an increased awareness concerning the role of values in psychology, psychologists lack clear guidelines to appraise the moral implications of their work. To address this discrepancy, the author proposes a framework for examining the moral dimensions of psychological discourse and practice. The framework contains 3 central elements: values, assumptions, and practices. These components may be used to articulate and to challenge the ethical, social, and political implications of theories and practices. To illustrate its applicability, the framework is used to evaluate the moral propositions of traditional, empowering, postmodern, and emancipatory communitarian approaches. The author concludes with a vision for addressing the shortcomings of predominant models by proposing for psychology an emancipatory communitarian approach that promotes the emancipation of vulnerable individuals and that fosters a balance among the values of self-determination, caring and compassion, collaboration and democratic participation, human diversity, and distributive justice.",
author = "Isaac Prilleltensky",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "517--535",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Values, Assumptions, and Practices

T2 - Assessing the Moral Implications of Psychological Discourse and Action

AU - Prilleltensky, Isaac

PY - 1997/5/1

Y1 - 1997/5/1

N2 - Despite an increased awareness concerning the role of values in psychology, psychologists lack clear guidelines to appraise the moral implications of their work. To address this discrepancy, the author proposes a framework for examining the moral dimensions of psychological discourse and practice. The framework contains 3 central elements: values, assumptions, and practices. These components may be used to articulate and to challenge the ethical, social, and political implications of theories and practices. To illustrate its applicability, the framework is used to evaluate the moral propositions of traditional, empowering, postmodern, and emancipatory communitarian approaches. The author concludes with a vision for addressing the shortcomings of predominant models by proposing for psychology an emancipatory communitarian approach that promotes the emancipation of vulnerable individuals and that fosters a balance among the values of self-determination, caring and compassion, collaboration and democratic participation, human diversity, and distributive justice.

AB - Despite an increased awareness concerning the role of values in psychology, psychologists lack clear guidelines to appraise the moral implications of their work. To address this discrepancy, the author proposes a framework for examining the moral dimensions of psychological discourse and practice. The framework contains 3 central elements: values, assumptions, and practices. These components may be used to articulate and to challenge the ethical, social, and political implications of theories and practices. To illustrate its applicability, the framework is used to evaluate the moral propositions of traditional, empowering, postmodern, and emancipatory communitarian approaches. The author concludes with a vision for addressing the shortcomings of predominant models by proposing for psychology an emancipatory communitarian approach that promotes the emancipation of vulnerable individuals and that fosters a balance among the values of self-determination, caring and compassion, collaboration and democratic participation, human diversity, and distributive justice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031129171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031129171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11644923

AN - SCOPUS:0031129171

VL - 52

SP - 517

EP - 535

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 5

ER -