Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Impact of trimester and parity

Shuang Ji, Qi Long, Donald J Newport, Hyeji Na, Bettina Knight, Elizabeth B. Zach, Natalie J. Morris, Michael Kutner, Zachary N. Stowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to delineate the optimal cutpoints for depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to assess the perinatal factors influencing these scores. Women participating in prospective investigations of maternal mental illness were enrolled prior to 28 weeks gestation and followed through 6 months postpartum. At each visit, subjects completed self-rated depression scales - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and clinician-rated scales - Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 17 and HRSD 21). These scores were compared to the SCID Mood Module for the presence of fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) during 6 perinatal windows: preconception; first trimester; 2nd trimester; 3rd trimester; early postpartum; and later postpartum. Optimal cutpoints were determined by maximizing the sum of each scale's sensitivity and specificity. Stratified ROC analyses determined the impact of previous pregnancy and comparison of initial to follow-up visits. A total of 534 women encompassing 640 pregnancies and 4025 follow-up visits were included. ROC analysis demonstrated that all 4 scales were highly predictive of MDE. The AUCs ranged from 0.857 to 0.971 and were all highly significant (p < .0001). Optimal cutpoints were higher at initial visits and for multigravidas and demonstrated more variability for the self-rated scales. These data indicate that both clinician-rated and self-rated scales can be effective tools in identifying perinatal episodes of major depression. However, the results also suggest that prior childbirth experiences and the use of scales longitudinally across the perinatal period influence optimal cutpoints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-219
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parity
Postpartum Period
Depression
Pregnancy
ROC Curve
Postpartum Depression
First Pregnancy Trimester
Area Under Curve
Mothers
Parturition
Sensitivity and Specificity
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Beck depression inventory
  • Depression
  • Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
  • Hamilton rating scale for depression
  • Postpartum
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period : Impact of trimester and parity. / Ji, Shuang; Long, Qi; Newport, Donald J; Na, Hyeji; Knight, Bettina; Zach, Elizabeth B.; Morris, Natalie J.; Kutner, Michael; Stowe, Zachary N.

In: Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 213-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ji, Shuang ; Long, Qi ; Newport, Donald J ; Na, Hyeji ; Knight, Bettina ; Zach, Elizabeth B. ; Morris, Natalie J. ; Kutner, Michael ; Stowe, Zachary N. / Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period : Impact of trimester and parity. In: Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2011 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 213-219.
@article{c17bae4a5841426185f2bebd2d7bd169,
title = "Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Impact of trimester and parity",
abstract = "The objective of the current study was to delineate the optimal cutpoints for depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to assess the perinatal factors influencing these scores. Women participating in prospective investigations of maternal mental illness were enrolled prior to 28 weeks gestation and followed through 6 months postpartum. At each visit, subjects completed self-rated depression scales - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and clinician-rated scales - Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 17 and HRSD 21). These scores were compared to the SCID Mood Module for the presence of fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) during 6 perinatal windows: preconception; first trimester; 2nd trimester; 3rd trimester; early postpartum; and later postpartum. Optimal cutpoints were determined by maximizing the sum of each scale's sensitivity and specificity. Stratified ROC analyses determined the impact of previous pregnancy and comparison of initial to follow-up visits. A total of 534 women encompassing 640 pregnancies and 4025 follow-up visits were included. ROC analysis demonstrated that all 4 scales were highly predictive of MDE. The AUCs ranged from 0.857 to 0.971 and were all highly significant (p < .0001). Optimal cutpoints were higher at initial visits and for multigravidas and demonstrated more variability for the self-rated scales. These data indicate that both clinician-rated and self-rated scales can be effective tools in identifying perinatal episodes of major depression. However, the results also suggest that prior childbirth experiences and the use of scales longitudinally across the perinatal period influence optimal cutpoints.",
keywords = "Beck depression inventory, Depression, Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, Hamilton rating scale for depression, Postpartum, Pregnancy",
author = "Shuang Ji and Qi Long and Newport, {Donald J} and Hyeji Na and Bettina Knight and Zach, {Elizabeth B.} and Morris, {Natalie J.} and Michael Kutner and Stowe, {Zachary N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "213--219",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Research",
issn = "0022-3956",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period

T2 - Impact of trimester and parity

AU - Ji, Shuang

AU - Long, Qi

AU - Newport, Donald J

AU - Na, Hyeji

AU - Knight, Bettina

AU - Zach, Elizabeth B.

AU - Morris, Natalie J.

AU - Kutner, Michael

AU - Stowe, Zachary N.

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - The objective of the current study was to delineate the optimal cutpoints for depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to assess the perinatal factors influencing these scores. Women participating in prospective investigations of maternal mental illness were enrolled prior to 28 weeks gestation and followed through 6 months postpartum. At each visit, subjects completed self-rated depression scales - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and clinician-rated scales - Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 17 and HRSD 21). These scores were compared to the SCID Mood Module for the presence of fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) during 6 perinatal windows: preconception; first trimester; 2nd trimester; 3rd trimester; early postpartum; and later postpartum. Optimal cutpoints were determined by maximizing the sum of each scale's sensitivity and specificity. Stratified ROC analyses determined the impact of previous pregnancy and comparison of initial to follow-up visits. A total of 534 women encompassing 640 pregnancies and 4025 follow-up visits were included. ROC analysis demonstrated that all 4 scales were highly predictive of MDE. The AUCs ranged from 0.857 to 0.971 and were all highly significant (p < .0001). Optimal cutpoints were higher at initial visits and for multigravidas and demonstrated more variability for the self-rated scales. These data indicate that both clinician-rated and self-rated scales can be effective tools in identifying perinatal episodes of major depression. However, the results also suggest that prior childbirth experiences and the use of scales longitudinally across the perinatal period influence optimal cutpoints.

AB - The objective of the current study was to delineate the optimal cutpoints for depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period and to assess the perinatal factors influencing these scores. Women participating in prospective investigations of maternal mental illness were enrolled prior to 28 weeks gestation and followed through 6 months postpartum. At each visit, subjects completed self-rated depression scales - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and clinician-rated scales - Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 17 and HRSD 21). These scores were compared to the SCID Mood Module for the presence of fulfilling diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) during 6 perinatal windows: preconception; first trimester; 2nd trimester; 3rd trimester; early postpartum; and later postpartum. Optimal cutpoints were determined by maximizing the sum of each scale's sensitivity and specificity. Stratified ROC analyses determined the impact of previous pregnancy and comparison of initial to follow-up visits. A total of 534 women encompassing 640 pregnancies and 4025 follow-up visits were included. ROC analysis demonstrated that all 4 scales were highly predictive of MDE. The AUCs ranged from 0.857 to 0.971 and were all highly significant (p < .0001). Optimal cutpoints were higher at initial visits and for multigravidas and demonstrated more variability for the self-rated scales. These data indicate that both clinician-rated and self-rated scales can be effective tools in identifying perinatal episodes of major depression. However, the results also suggest that prior childbirth experiences and the use of scales longitudinally across the perinatal period influence optimal cutpoints.

KW - Beck depression inventory

KW - Depression

KW - Edinburgh postnatal depression scale

KW - Hamilton rating scale for depression

KW - Postpartum

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650678256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650678256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 20542520

AN - SCOPUS:78650678256

VL - 45

SP - 213

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research

SN - 0022-3956

IS - 2

ER -