Validity and specificity of the children's automatic thoughts scale in clinically anxious and non-clinical children

Jamie A. Micco, Jill T. Ehrenreich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study is a preliminary examination of the internal, criterion, and convergent validity of the Children's Automatic Thoughts Scale (CATS; Schniering and Rapee 2002), a developmentally sensitive measure of cognitions associated with childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders, among clinically anxious and non-clinical children. Participants included 40 children (ages 7-14) with a clinical anxiety disorder and 40 non-clinical children with no prior anxiety disorder diagnosis. Results supported the internal consistency and criterion validity of the measure. In addition, controlling for age, sex, and clinical status, convergent validity was largely supported, with the Physical Threat subscale correlating with self-report of generalized anxiety and separation anxiety, and the Social Threat and Personal Failure subscales correlating with self-report of social anxiety and major depression. Limitations and suggestions for further research on the utility of the CATS are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-536
Number of pages5
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2009

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Children
  • Cognition
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and specificity of the children's automatic thoughts scale in clinically anxious and non-clinical children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this