Using insights from prospect theory to enhance sustainable decision making by agribusinesses in Argentina

Jimena Gonzalez-Ramirez, Poonam Arora, Guillermo P Podesta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Farm production often involves family-owned agribusinesses where decisions are made by households or individuals, not corporate managers. As these decisions have important economic, environmental, and social implications, decision-making processes must be understood to foster sustainable agricultural production. Decision experiments, involving lotteries, targeting farmers in the Argentine Pampas were used to estimate prospect theory (PT) parameters. Results suggest that decisions under risk are better represented by prospect theory than by expected utility (EU) theory: Decision makers treat gains and losses differently and use subjective probabilities of outcomes; they are quite loss averse and are more likely to overweigh probabilities of infrequent events, such as large droughts or floods. Statistical testing revealed heterogeneity in the risk tied to land tenure (land owners vs. renters) and agribusiness roles (farmers vs. technical advisors). Perceptions of risk, probability, and outcomes played a large role in the sustainability of production. Due to a strong desire to avoid losses, decision makers have a greater short term focus: Immediate economic outcomes are more salient, and environmental and social investments are framed as costs rather than long-term gains. This research can help design policies, programs, and tools that assist agribusinesses in managing better contradictions across the triple bottom line to ensure greater sustainability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2693
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

agroindustry
Argentina
Decision making
decision making
Sustainable development
decision maker
Economics
farmer
Decision theory
Drought
sustainability
social investment
utility theory
Farms
Managers
agricultural production
drought
decision-making process
economics
natural disaster

Keywords

  • Agribusiness decision making
  • Land tenure
  • Prospect theory
  • Risk preferences
  • Sustainable agriculture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Using insights from prospect theory to enhance sustainable decision making by agribusinesses in Argentina. / Gonzalez-Ramirez, Jimena; Arora, Poonam; Podesta, Guillermo P.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 8, 2693, 01.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4807eaa983da4c9984e860dc6e69528e,
title = "Using insights from prospect theory to enhance sustainable decision making by agribusinesses in Argentina",
abstract = "Farm production often involves family-owned agribusinesses where decisions are made by households or individuals, not corporate managers. As these decisions have important economic, environmental, and social implications, decision-making processes must be understood to foster sustainable agricultural production. Decision experiments, involving lotteries, targeting farmers in the Argentine Pampas were used to estimate prospect theory (PT) parameters. Results suggest that decisions under risk are better represented by prospect theory than by expected utility (EU) theory: Decision makers treat gains and losses differently and use subjective probabilities of outcomes; they are quite loss averse and are more likely to overweigh probabilities of infrequent events, such as large droughts or floods. Statistical testing revealed heterogeneity in the risk tied to land tenure (land owners vs. renters) and agribusiness roles (farmers vs. technical advisors). Perceptions of risk, probability, and outcomes played a large role in the sustainability of production. Due to a strong desire to avoid losses, decision makers have a greater short term focus: Immediate economic outcomes are more salient, and environmental and social investments are framed as costs rather than long-term gains. This research can help design policies, programs, and tools that assist agribusinesses in managing better contradictions across the triple bottom line to ensure greater sustainability.",
keywords = "Agribusiness decision making, Land tenure, Prospect theory, Risk preferences, Sustainable agriculture",
author = "Jimena Gonzalez-Ramirez and Poonam Arora and Podesta, {Guillermo P}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/su10082693",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using insights from prospect theory to enhance sustainable decision making by agribusinesses in Argentina

AU - Gonzalez-Ramirez, Jimena

AU - Arora, Poonam

AU - Podesta, Guillermo P

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Farm production often involves family-owned agribusinesses where decisions are made by households or individuals, not corporate managers. As these decisions have important economic, environmental, and social implications, decision-making processes must be understood to foster sustainable agricultural production. Decision experiments, involving lotteries, targeting farmers in the Argentine Pampas were used to estimate prospect theory (PT) parameters. Results suggest that decisions under risk are better represented by prospect theory than by expected utility (EU) theory: Decision makers treat gains and losses differently and use subjective probabilities of outcomes; they are quite loss averse and are more likely to overweigh probabilities of infrequent events, such as large droughts or floods. Statistical testing revealed heterogeneity in the risk tied to land tenure (land owners vs. renters) and agribusiness roles (farmers vs. technical advisors). Perceptions of risk, probability, and outcomes played a large role in the sustainability of production. Due to a strong desire to avoid losses, decision makers have a greater short term focus: Immediate economic outcomes are more salient, and environmental and social investments are framed as costs rather than long-term gains. This research can help design policies, programs, and tools that assist agribusinesses in managing better contradictions across the triple bottom line to ensure greater sustainability.

AB - Farm production often involves family-owned agribusinesses where decisions are made by households or individuals, not corporate managers. As these decisions have important economic, environmental, and social implications, decision-making processes must be understood to foster sustainable agricultural production. Decision experiments, involving lotteries, targeting farmers in the Argentine Pampas were used to estimate prospect theory (PT) parameters. Results suggest that decisions under risk are better represented by prospect theory than by expected utility (EU) theory: Decision makers treat gains and losses differently and use subjective probabilities of outcomes; they are quite loss averse and are more likely to overweigh probabilities of infrequent events, such as large droughts or floods. Statistical testing revealed heterogeneity in the risk tied to land tenure (land owners vs. renters) and agribusiness roles (farmers vs. technical advisors). Perceptions of risk, probability, and outcomes played a large role in the sustainability of production. Due to a strong desire to avoid losses, decision makers have a greater short term focus: Immediate economic outcomes are more salient, and environmental and social investments are framed as costs rather than long-term gains. This research can help design policies, programs, and tools that assist agribusinesses in managing better contradictions across the triple bottom line to ensure greater sustainability.

KW - Agribusiness decision making

KW - Land tenure

KW - Prospect theory

KW - Risk preferences

KW - Sustainable agriculture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051080816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051080816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10082693

DO - 10.3390/su10082693

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051080816

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 8

M1 - 2693

ER -