Uses of the word "macula" in written English, 1400-present

Stephen Schwartz, Christopher T. Leffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compiled uses of the word "macula" in written English by searching multiple databases, including the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, America's Historical Newspapers, the Gale Cengage Collections, and others. "Macula" has been used: as a non-medical "spot" or "stain", literal or figurative, including in astronomy and in Shakespeare; as a medical skin lesion, occasionally with a following descriptive adjective, such as a color (macula alba); as a corneal lesion, including the earliest identified use in English, circa 1400; and to describe the center of the retina. Francesco Buzzi described a yellow color in the posterior pole ("retina tinta di un color giallo") in 1782, but did not use the word "macula". "Macula lutea" was published by Samuel Thomas von Sömmering by 1799, and subsequently used in 1818 by James Wardrop, which appears to be the first known use in English. The Google n-gram database shows a marked increase in the frequencies of both "macula" and "macula lutea" following the introduction of the ophthalmoscope in 1850. "Macula" has been used in multiple contexts in written English. Modern databases provide powerful tools to explore historical uses of this word, which may be underappreciated by contemporary ophthalmologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-654
Number of pages6
JournalSurvey of Ophthalmology
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Macula Lutea
Color
Databases
Retina
Astronomy
Ophthalmoscopes
Newspapers
Coloring Agents
Skin

Keywords

  • Cornea
  • Francesco buzzi
  • James wardrop
  • Macula
  • Macula lutea
  • Ophthalmic history
  • Retina
  • Samuel thomas von sömmering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Uses of the word "macula" in written English, 1400-present. / Schwartz, Stephen; Leffler, Christopher T.

In: Survey of Ophthalmology, Vol. 59, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 649-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwartz, Stephen ; Leffler, Christopher T. / Uses of the word "macula" in written English, 1400-present. In: Survey of Ophthalmology. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 6. pp. 649-654.
@article{c92bc9c5ee6a4086b7a0fa59dbddd9e0,
title = "Uses of the word {"}macula{"} in written English, 1400-present",
abstract = "We compiled uses of the word {"}macula{"} in written English by searching multiple databases, including the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, America's Historical Newspapers, the Gale Cengage Collections, and others. {"}Macula{"} has been used: as a non-medical {"}spot{"} or {"}stain{"}, literal or figurative, including in astronomy and in Shakespeare; as a medical skin lesion, occasionally with a following descriptive adjective, such as a color (macula alba); as a corneal lesion, including the earliest identified use in English, circa 1400; and to describe the center of the retina. Francesco Buzzi described a yellow color in the posterior pole ({"}retina tinta di un color giallo{"}) in 1782, but did not use the word {"}macula{"}. {"}Macula lutea{"} was published by Samuel Thomas von S{\"o}mmering by 1799, and subsequently used in 1818 by James Wardrop, which appears to be the first known use in English. The Google n-gram database shows a marked increase in the frequencies of both {"}macula{"} and {"}macula lutea{"} following the introduction of the ophthalmoscope in 1850. {"}Macula{"} has been used in multiple contexts in written English. Modern databases provide powerful tools to explore historical uses of this word, which may be underappreciated by contemporary ophthalmologists.",
keywords = "Cornea, Francesco buzzi, James wardrop, Macula, Macula lutea, Ophthalmic history, Retina, Samuel thomas von s{\"o}mmering",
author = "Stephen Schwartz and Leffler, {Christopher T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "649--654",
journal = "Survey of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0039-6257",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uses of the word "macula" in written English, 1400-present

AU - Schwartz, Stephen

AU - Leffler, Christopher T.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - We compiled uses of the word "macula" in written English by searching multiple databases, including the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, America's Historical Newspapers, the Gale Cengage Collections, and others. "Macula" has been used: as a non-medical "spot" or "stain", literal or figurative, including in astronomy and in Shakespeare; as a medical skin lesion, occasionally with a following descriptive adjective, such as a color (macula alba); as a corneal lesion, including the earliest identified use in English, circa 1400; and to describe the center of the retina. Francesco Buzzi described a yellow color in the posterior pole ("retina tinta di un color giallo") in 1782, but did not use the word "macula". "Macula lutea" was published by Samuel Thomas von Sömmering by 1799, and subsequently used in 1818 by James Wardrop, which appears to be the first known use in English. The Google n-gram database shows a marked increase in the frequencies of both "macula" and "macula lutea" following the introduction of the ophthalmoscope in 1850. "Macula" has been used in multiple contexts in written English. Modern databases provide powerful tools to explore historical uses of this word, which may be underappreciated by contemporary ophthalmologists.

AB - We compiled uses of the word "macula" in written English by searching multiple databases, including the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership, America's Historical Newspapers, the Gale Cengage Collections, and others. "Macula" has been used: as a non-medical "spot" or "stain", literal or figurative, including in astronomy and in Shakespeare; as a medical skin lesion, occasionally with a following descriptive adjective, such as a color (macula alba); as a corneal lesion, including the earliest identified use in English, circa 1400; and to describe the center of the retina. Francesco Buzzi described a yellow color in the posterior pole ("retina tinta di un color giallo") in 1782, but did not use the word "macula". "Macula lutea" was published by Samuel Thomas von Sömmering by 1799, and subsequently used in 1818 by James Wardrop, which appears to be the first known use in English. The Google n-gram database shows a marked increase in the frequencies of both "macula" and "macula lutea" following the introduction of the ophthalmoscope in 1850. "Macula" has been used in multiple contexts in written English. Modern databases provide powerful tools to explore historical uses of this word, which may be underappreciated by contemporary ophthalmologists.

KW - Cornea

KW - Francesco buzzi

KW - James wardrop

KW - Macula

KW - Macula lutea

KW - Ophthalmic history

KW - Retina

KW - Samuel thomas von sömmering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908233321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908233321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.03.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 24913329

AN - SCOPUS:84908233321

VL - 59

SP - 649

EP - 654

JO - Survey of Ophthalmology

JF - Survey of Ophthalmology

SN - 0039-6257

IS - 6

ER -