Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Richard S. Mangus, Jonathan A. Fridell, Rodrigo Vianna, Amanda B. Cooper, Daniel T. Jones, A. Joe Tector

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The piggyback hepatectomy technique (PGB) is avoided in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to decrease the theoretical risk of a positive vena cava margin or hematologic metastases. This study reports the routine use of PGB in 138 consecutive adult, deceased donor liver transplant recipients with HCC. Piggyback hepatectomy technique was used in 119 subjects, with 19 recipients receiving the conventional bicaval technique (CONV). Median follow-up was 34 months. There were 95 patients (69%) within and 43 patients (31%) outside, Milan criteria at transplant. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was 13% and survival was 84.1% (1-year) and 77.4% (2-years). The PGB and CONV study groups did not differ in survival within or outside Milan criteria. Cox proportional hazards modeling of posttransplant survival demonstrated statistically similar survival for PGB and CONV. In conclusion, the presence of HCC in liver transplant patients should not preclude the use of PGB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1496-1499
Number of pages4
JournalTransplantation
Volume85
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostaglandins B
Hepatectomy
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Liver
Survival
Transplants
Venae Cavae
Transplant Recipients
Tissue Donors
Neoplasm Metastasis
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Conventional hepatectomy technique
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Liver cancer
  • Orthotopic liver transplant
  • Piggyback hepatectomy technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Immunology

Cite this

Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. / Mangus, Richard S.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Vianna, Rodrigo; Cooper, Amanda B.; Jones, Daniel T.; Tector, A. Joe.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 85, No. 10, 27.05.2008, p. 1496-1499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mangus, Richard S. ; Fridell, Jonathan A. ; Vianna, Rodrigo ; Cooper, Amanda B. ; Jones, Daniel T. ; Tector, A. Joe. / Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Transplantation. 2008 ; Vol. 85, No. 10. pp. 1496-1499.
@article{f6cd6761229545b187b0488f749b8f53,
title = "Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma",
abstract = "The piggyback hepatectomy technique (PGB) is avoided in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to decrease the theoretical risk of a positive vena cava margin or hematologic metastases. This study reports the routine use of PGB in 138 consecutive adult, deceased donor liver transplant recipients with HCC. Piggyback hepatectomy technique was used in 119 subjects, with 19 recipients receiving the conventional bicaval technique (CONV). Median follow-up was 34 months. There were 95 patients (69{\%}) within and 43 patients (31{\%}) outside, Milan criteria at transplant. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was 13{\%} and survival was 84.1{\%} (1-year) and 77.4{\%} (2-years). The PGB and CONV study groups did not differ in survival within or outside Milan criteria. Cox proportional hazards modeling of posttransplant survival demonstrated statistically similar survival for PGB and CONV. In conclusion, the presence of HCC in liver transplant patients should not preclude the use of PGB.",
keywords = "Conventional hepatectomy technique, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Liver cancer, Orthotopic liver transplant, Piggyback hepatectomy technique",
author = "Mangus, {Richard S.} and Fridell, {Jonathan A.} and Rodrigo Vianna and Cooper, {Amanda B.} and Jones, {Daniel T.} and Tector, {A. Joe}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0b013e31816feec0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1496--1499",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma

AU - Mangus, Richard S.

AU - Fridell, Jonathan A.

AU - Vianna, Rodrigo

AU - Cooper, Amanda B.

AU - Jones, Daniel T.

AU - Tector, A. Joe

PY - 2008/5/27

Y1 - 2008/5/27

N2 - The piggyback hepatectomy technique (PGB) is avoided in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to decrease the theoretical risk of a positive vena cava margin or hematologic metastases. This study reports the routine use of PGB in 138 consecutive adult, deceased donor liver transplant recipients with HCC. Piggyback hepatectomy technique was used in 119 subjects, with 19 recipients receiving the conventional bicaval technique (CONV). Median follow-up was 34 months. There were 95 patients (69%) within and 43 patients (31%) outside, Milan criteria at transplant. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was 13% and survival was 84.1% (1-year) and 77.4% (2-years). The PGB and CONV study groups did not differ in survival within or outside Milan criteria. Cox proportional hazards modeling of posttransplant survival demonstrated statistically similar survival for PGB and CONV. In conclusion, the presence of HCC in liver transplant patients should not preclude the use of PGB.

AB - The piggyback hepatectomy technique (PGB) is avoided in liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to decrease the theoretical risk of a positive vena cava margin or hematologic metastases. This study reports the routine use of PGB in 138 consecutive adult, deceased donor liver transplant recipients with HCC. Piggyback hepatectomy technique was used in 119 subjects, with 19 recipients receiving the conventional bicaval technique (CONV). Median follow-up was 34 months. There were 95 patients (69%) within and 43 patients (31%) outside, Milan criteria at transplant. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was 13% and survival was 84.1% (1-year) and 77.4% (2-years). The PGB and CONV study groups did not differ in survival within or outside Milan criteria. Cox proportional hazards modeling of posttransplant survival demonstrated statistically similar survival for PGB and CONV. In conclusion, the presence of HCC in liver transplant patients should not preclude the use of PGB.

KW - Conventional hepatectomy technique

KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

KW - Liver cancer

KW - Orthotopic liver transplant

KW - Piggyback hepatectomy technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48649091347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48649091347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816feec0

DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816feec0

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 1496

EP - 1499

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 10

ER -