Use of electron microscopy and other special techniques in the investigation of suspected specimen contamination

C. W. Zuppan, D. A. Weeks, G. D. Wenger, Ofelia A Alvarez, G. W. Mierau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Contamination of a biopsy or surgical specimen with spurious tissue is an uncommon but potentially disastrous event. In this regard, the case of a 5-year-old boy referred for treatment of an abdominal tumor is presented. Sections made from paraffin blocks brought by the family showed both neuroblastoma and a spindle cell sarcoma, initially suggesting the possibility of divergent or mixed differentiation. However, the resemblance of the spindle cell component to well-differentiated leiomyosarcoma rather than rhabdomyosarcoma raised the suspicion that a specimen contamination had occurred. Electron microscopy was instrumental in confirming the smooth muscle nature of the sarcomatous component, leading to a fluorescence in situ hybridization study, which established that this component was incompatible with the patient's gender. This case illustrates that even when the light microscopic differential has been compromised by specimen mishandling, electron microscopy can at times provide useful information regarding specimen identity, as well as assist in sorting out the correct diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-456
Number of pages4
JournalUltrastructural Pathology
Volume21
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 18 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electron microscopy
electron microscopy
Electron Microscopy
contamination
Contamination
spindles
Leiomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Biopsy
Cellular Structures
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Neuroblastoma
Sorting
Sarcoma
Paraffin
Paraffins
Smooth Muscle
Muscle
Tumors
Fluorescence

Keywords

  • Electron microscopy
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • Leiomyosarcoma
  • Neuroblastoma
  • Specimen contamination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Instrumentation
  • Structural Biology

Cite this

Use of electron microscopy and other special techniques in the investigation of suspected specimen contamination. / Zuppan, C. W.; Weeks, D. A.; Wenger, G. D.; Alvarez, Ofelia A; Mierau, G. W.

In: Ultrastructural Pathology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 18.09.1997, p. 453-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zuppan, C. W. ; Weeks, D. A. ; Wenger, G. D. ; Alvarez, Ofelia A ; Mierau, G. W. / Use of electron microscopy and other special techniques in the investigation of suspected specimen contamination. In: Ultrastructural Pathology. 1997 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 453-456.
@article{1beef17bfd0142efb6a0d71691718d5e,
title = "Use of electron microscopy and other special techniques in the investigation of suspected specimen contamination",
abstract = "Contamination of a biopsy or surgical specimen with spurious tissue is an uncommon but potentially disastrous event. In this regard, the case of a 5-year-old boy referred for treatment of an abdominal tumor is presented. Sections made from paraffin blocks brought by the family showed both neuroblastoma and a spindle cell sarcoma, initially suggesting the possibility of divergent or mixed differentiation. However, the resemblance of the spindle cell component to well-differentiated leiomyosarcoma rather than rhabdomyosarcoma raised the suspicion that a specimen contamination had occurred. Electron microscopy was instrumental in confirming the smooth muscle nature of the sarcomatous component, leading to a fluorescence in situ hybridization study, which established that this component was incompatible with the patient's gender. This case illustrates that even when the light microscopic differential has been compromised by specimen mishandling, electron microscopy can at times provide useful information regarding specimen identity, as well as assist in sorting out the correct diagnosis.",
keywords = "Electron microscopy, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Leiomyosarcoma, Neuroblastoma, Specimen contamination",
author = "Zuppan, {C. W.} and Weeks, {D. A.} and Wenger, {G. D.} and Alvarez, {Ofelia A} and Mierau, {G. W.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
day = "18",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "453--456",
journal = "Ultrastructural Pathology",
issn = "0191-3123",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of electron microscopy and other special techniques in the investigation of suspected specimen contamination

AU - Zuppan, C. W.

AU - Weeks, D. A.

AU - Wenger, G. D.

AU - Alvarez, Ofelia A

AU - Mierau, G. W.

PY - 1997/9/18

Y1 - 1997/9/18

N2 - Contamination of a biopsy or surgical specimen with spurious tissue is an uncommon but potentially disastrous event. In this regard, the case of a 5-year-old boy referred for treatment of an abdominal tumor is presented. Sections made from paraffin blocks brought by the family showed both neuroblastoma and a spindle cell sarcoma, initially suggesting the possibility of divergent or mixed differentiation. However, the resemblance of the spindle cell component to well-differentiated leiomyosarcoma rather than rhabdomyosarcoma raised the suspicion that a specimen contamination had occurred. Electron microscopy was instrumental in confirming the smooth muscle nature of the sarcomatous component, leading to a fluorescence in situ hybridization study, which established that this component was incompatible with the patient's gender. This case illustrates that even when the light microscopic differential has been compromised by specimen mishandling, electron microscopy can at times provide useful information regarding specimen identity, as well as assist in sorting out the correct diagnosis.

AB - Contamination of a biopsy or surgical specimen with spurious tissue is an uncommon but potentially disastrous event. In this regard, the case of a 5-year-old boy referred for treatment of an abdominal tumor is presented. Sections made from paraffin blocks brought by the family showed both neuroblastoma and a spindle cell sarcoma, initially suggesting the possibility of divergent or mixed differentiation. However, the resemblance of the spindle cell component to well-differentiated leiomyosarcoma rather than rhabdomyosarcoma raised the suspicion that a specimen contamination had occurred. Electron microscopy was instrumental in confirming the smooth muscle nature of the sarcomatous component, leading to a fluorescence in situ hybridization study, which established that this component was incompatible with the patient's gender. This case illustrates that even when the light microscopic differential has been compromised by specimen mishandling, electron microscopy can at times provide useful information regarding specimen identity, as well as assist in sorting out the correct diagnosis.

KW - Electron microscopy

KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridization

KW - Leiomyosarcoma

KW - Neuroblastoma

KW - Specimen contamination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030920473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030920473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 453

EP - 456

JO - Ultrastructural Pathology

JF - Ultrastructural Pathology

SN - 0191-3123

IS - 5

ER -