U.S.-China security relations

Past, present, and future

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the differing agendas of the United States and China, a meaningful strategic partnership is impossible under current circumstances. This should not, however, preclude a security relationship that aims at preventing the outbreak of hostilities. Future American administrations should avoid the assumptions, first, that engagement with China cannot be achieved without appeasement of China and, second, that anything short of engagement with China is isolation of China. Strategic rivals are not necessarily enemies. Apart from small extremist elements, there is no enthusiasm in either country for armed confrontation. China and the United States have an important stake in the continued prosperity of each other. Beijing will continue to test the limits of U.S. commitment to its allies and principles, anticipating that Washington's reactions will be restrained by America's belief that economic growth eventually solves all problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-65
Number of pages33
JournalIssues and Studies
Volume36
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

China
present
prosperity
allies
social isolation
economic growth
commitment

Keywords

  • Asia-Pacific defense
  • Cross-Strait relations
  • Strategic partnership
  • U.S. China policy
  • U.S.-China security relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

U.S.-China security relations : Past, present, and future. / Dreyer, June Teufel.

In: Issues and Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, 07.2000, p. 33-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45f5b620cf5e4eaeb0ca521ddcb5a38f,
title = "U.S.-China security relations: Past, present, and future",
abstract = "Given the differing agendas of the United States and China, a meaningful strategic partnership is impossible under current circumstances. This should not, however, preclude a security relationship that aims at preventing the outbreak of hostilities. Future American administrations should avoid the assumptions, first, that engagement with China cannot be achieved without appeasement of China and, second, that anything short of engagement with China is isolation of China. Strategic rivals are not necessarily enemies. Apart from small extremist elements, there is no enthusiasm in either country for armed confrontation. China and the United States have an important stake in the continued prosperity of each other. Beijing will continue to test the limits of U.S. commitment to its allies and principles, anticipating that Washington's reactions will be restrained by America's belief that economic growth eventually solves all problems.",
keywords = "Asia-Pacific defense, Cross-Strait relations, Strategic partnership, U.S. China policy, U.S.-China security relations",
author = "Dreyer, {June Teufel}",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "33--65",
journal = "Issues and Studies",
issn = "1013-2511",
publisher = "Institute of International Relations",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - U.S.-China security relations

T2 - Past, present, and future

AU - Dreyer, June Teufel

PY - 2000/7

Y1 - 2000/7

N2 - Given the differing agendas of the United States and China, a meaningful strategic partnership is impossible under current circumstances. This should not, however, preclude a security relationship that aims at preventing the outbreak of hostilities. Future American administrations should avoid the assumptions, first, that engagement with China cannot be achieved without appeasement of China and, second, that anything short of engagement with China is isolation of China. Strategic rivals are not necessarily enemies. Apart from small extremist elements, there is no enthusiasm in either country for armed confrontation. China and the United States have an important stake in the continued prosperity of each other. Beijing will continue to test the limits of U.S. commitment to its allies and principles, anticipating that Washington's reactions will be restrained by America's belief that economic growth eventually solves all problems.

AB - Given the differing agendas of the United States and China, a meaningful strategic partnership is impossible under current circumstances. This should not, however, preclude a security relationship that aims at preventing the outbreak of hostilities. Future American administrations should avoid the assumptions, first, that engagement with China cannot be achieved without appeasement of China and, second, that anything short of engagement with China is isolation of China. Strategic rivals are not necessarily enemies. Apart from small extremist elements, there is no enthusiasm in either country for armed confrontation. China and the United States have an important stake in the continued prosperity of each other. Beijing will continue to test the limits of U.S. commitment to its allies and principles, anticipating that Washington's reactions will be restrained by America's belief that economic growth eventually solves all problems.

KW - Asia-Pacific defense

KW - Cross-Strait relations

KW - Strategic partnership

KW - U.S. China policy

KW - U.S.-China security relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041027365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041027365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 33

EP - 65

JO - Issues and Studies

JF - Issues and Studies

SN - 1013-2511

IS - 4

ER -