Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas

Ricardo J Komotar, Christopher P. Kellner, Jeffrey N. Bruce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite advances in microsurgical and skull base techniques, the surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas continues to pose a challenge to surgeons. Controversy continues to exist between proponents of subtotal resection in conjunction with radiotherapy, who argue that this less aggressive approach can yield equivalent control rates with lower morbidity, and others who argue for the superiority of gross total resection. Regardless of whether gross total or subtotal resection is the goal, surgical planning must include a thorough endocrine and neuroophthamological evaluation as well as imaging, and the approach, whether trans-sphenoidal or transcranial, must take into account the nature of the tumour and its location. In addition, optimal management of craniopharyngiomas must consist of individualised and multidisciplinary therapy including an array of subspeciality fields such as endocrinology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropsychology and radiation oncology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Neurological Review
Volume5
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Craniopharyngioma
Neuropsychology
Radiation Oncology
Endocrinology
Skull Base
Ophthalmology
Radiotherapy
Morbidity
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Craniopharyngioma
  • Craniotomy
  • Neurosurgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas. / Komotar, Ricardo J; Kellner, Christopher P.; Bruce, Jeffrey N.

In: European Neurological Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.12.2010, p. 107-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Komotar, RJ, Kellner, CP & Bruce, JN 2010, 'Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas', European Neurological Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107-112.
Komotar, Ricardo J ; Kellner, Christopher P. ; Bruce, Jeffrey N. / Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas. In: European Neurological Review. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 107-112.
@article{ee153b36647b47f4aac8a6ceaaa09372,
title = "Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas",
abstract = "Despite advances in microsurgical and skull base techniques, the surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas continues to pose a challenge to surgeons. Controversy continues to exist between proponents of subtotal resection in conjunction with radiotherapy, who argue that this less aggressive approach can yield equivalent control rates with lower morbidity, and others who argue for the superiority of gross total resection. Regardless of whether gross total or subtotal resection is the goal, surgical planning must include a thorough endocrine and neuroophthamological evaluation as well as imaging, and the approach, whether trans-sphenoidal or transcranial, must take into account the nature of the tumour and its location. In addition, optimal management of craniopharyngiomas must consist of individualised and multidisciplinary therapy including an array of subspeciality fields such as endocrinology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropsychology and radiation oncology.",
keywords = "Craniopharyngioma, Craniotomy, Neurosurgery",
author = "Komotar, {Ricardo J} and Kellner, {Christopher P.} and Bruce, {Jeffrey N.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "107--112",
journal = "European Neurological Review",
issn = "1758-3837",
publisher = "Touch Briefings",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Update on the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas

AU - Komotar, Ricardo J

AU - Kellner, Christopher P.

AU - Bruce, Jeffrey N.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Despite advances in microsurgical and skull base techniques, the surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas continues to pose a challenge to surgeons. Controversy continues to exist between proponents of subtotal resection in conjunction with radiotherapy, who argue that this less aggressive approach can yield equivalent control rates with lower morbidity, and others who argue for the superiority of gross total resection. Regardless of whether gross total or subtotal resection is the goal, surgical planning must include a thorough endocrine and neuroophthamological evaluation as well as imaging, and the approach, whether trans-sphenoidal or transcranial, must take into account the nature of the tumour and its location. In addition, optimal management of craniopharyngiomas must consist of individualised and multidisciplinary therapy including an array of subspeciality fields such as endocrinology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropsychology and radiation oncology.

AB - Despite advances in microsurgical and skull base techniques, the surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas continues to pose a challenge to surgeons. Controversy continues to exist between proponents of subtotal resection in conjunction with radiotherapy, who argue that this less aggressive approach can yield equivalent control rates with lower morbidity, and others who argue for the superiority of gross total resection. Regardless of whether gross total or subtotal resection is the goal, surgical planning must include a thorough endocrine and neuroophthamological evaluation as well as imaging, and the approach, whether trans-sphenoidal or transcranial, must take into account the nature of the tumour and its location. In addition, optimal management of craniopharyngiomas must consist of individualised and multidisciplinary therapy including an array of subspeciality fields such as endocrinology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropsychology and radiation oncology.

KW - Craniopharyngioma

KW - Craniotomy

KW - Neurosurgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858178944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858178944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858178944

VL - 5

SP - 107

EP - 112

JO - European Neurological Review

JF - European Neurological Review

SN - 1758-3837

IS - 1

ER -