Unconscious influences on decision making in blindsight

Berit Brogaard, Kristian Marlow, Kevin Rice

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Newell & Shanks (N&S) argue that an explanation for blindsight need not appeal to unconscious brain processes, citing research indicating that the condition merely reflects degraded visual experience. We reply that other evidence suggests blindsighters' predictive behavior under forced choice reflects cognitive access to low-level visual information that does not correlate with visual consciousness. Therefore, while we grant that visual consciousness may be required for full visual experience, we argue that it may not be needed for decision making and judgment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-23
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Unconscious influences on decision making in blindsight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this