UME-21 and Teaching Ethics: A Step in the Right Direction

Linda Orkin Lewin, Curtis A. Olson, Kenneth Goodman, Patricia K. Kokotailo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Ethics education for medical students has included a number of relatively vague descriptions of appropriate curricular objectives, but medical schools struggle with the general teaching of ethics, as well as with presenting the ethical dilemmas posed by managed care. This paper proposes some standards and uses them to analyze the general and managed care ethics content of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) curricula. Methods: We analyzed progress and final reports from each school to define their learning objectives, content, teaching methods, and evaluation strategies in ethics. Each was evaluated using principles of adult learning and Rest's Four Component Model of Moral Development. Good examples of curricular elements from participating schools are described. Results: Ethics curricula varied widely among the schools. Goals and objectives were often stated in generalities. Teaching methods were diverse and innovative, and several new combinations of learning activities were created to highlight ethics topics. Content represented managed care and non-managed care topics in varying proportions. Student surveys of attitudes toward managed care and opinions of the ethics programs were the most commonly used as evaluation tools. Some schools were able to develop more direct means of evaluating student learning. The Four Component Model was not fully addressed in the programs developed by the participating schools. Conclusions: We make recommendations about the objectives, teaching methods, content, and evaluation methods of an ideal medical school curriculum in ethics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume36
Issue numberSUPPL.
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Ethics
Teaching
Managed Care Programs
Learning
Curriculum
Medical Schools
Moral Development
Undergraduate Medical Education
Students
Direction compound
Medical Students
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Lewin, L. O., Olson, C. A., Goodman, K., & Kokotailo, P. K. (2004). UME-21 and Teaching Ethics: A Step in the Right Direction. Family Medicine, 36(SUPPL.).

UME-21 and Teaching Ethics : A Step in the Right Direction. / Lewin, Linda Orkin; Olson, Curtis A.; Goodman, Kenneth; Kokotailo, Patricia K.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 36, No. SUPPL., 01.01.2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewin, LO, Olson, CA, Goodman, K & Kokotailo, PK 2004, 'UME-21 and Teaching Ethics: A Step in the Right Direction', Family Medicine, vol. 36, no. SUPPL..
Lewin LO, Olson CA, Goodman K, Kokotailo PK. UME-21 and Teaching Ethics: A Step in the Right Direction. Family Medicine. 2004 Jan 1;36(SUPPL.).
Lewin, Linda Orkin ; Olson, Curtis A. ; Goodman, Kenneth ; Kokotailo, Patricia K. / UME-21 and Teaching Ethics : A Step in the Right Direction. In: Family Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 36, No. SUPPL.
@article{8a948787f2994a98a173439fc6170e39,
title = "UME-21 and Teaching Ethics: A Step in the Right Direction",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Ethics education for medical students has included a number of relatively vague descriptions of appropriate curricular objectives, but medical schools struggle with the general teaching of ethics, as well as with presenting the ethical dilemmas posed by managed care. This paper proposes some standards and uses them to analyze the general and managed care ethics content of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) curricula. Methods: We analyzed progress and final reports from each school to define their learning objectives, content, teaching methods, and evaluation strategies in ethics. Each was evaluated using principles of adult learning and Rest's Four Component Model of Moral Development. Good examples of curricular elements from participating schools are described. Results: Ethics curricula varied widely among the schools. Goals and objectives were often stated in generalities. Teaching methods were diverse and innovative, and several new combinations of learning activities were created to highlight ethics topics. Content represented managed care and non-managed care topics in varying proportions. Student surveys of attitudes toward managed care and opinions of the ethics programs were the most commonly used as evaluation tools. Some schools were able to develop more direct means of evaluating student learning. The Four Component Model was not fully addressed in the programs developed by the participating schools. Conclusions: We make recommendations about the objectives, teaching methods, content, and evaluation methods of an ideal medical school curriculum in ethics.",
author = "Lewin, {Linda Orkin} and Olson, {Curtis A.} and Kenneth Goodman and Kokotailo, {Patricia K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - UME-21 and Teaching Ethics

T2 - A Step in the Right Direction

AU - Lewin, Linda Orkin

AU - Olson, Curtis A.

AU - Goodman, Kenneth

AU - Kokotailo, Patricia K.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: Ethics education for medical students has included a number of relatively vague descriptions of appropriate curricular objectives, but medical schools struggle with the general teaching of ethics, as well as with presenting the ethical dilemmas posed by managed care. This paper proposes some standards and uses them to analyze the general and managed care ethics content of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) curricula. Methods: We analyzed progress and final reports from each school to define their learning objectives, content, teaching methods, and evaluation strategies in ethics. Each was evaluated using principles of adult learning and Rest's Four Component Model of Moral Development. Good examples of curricular elements from participating schools are described. Results: Ethics curricula varied widely among the schools. Goals and objectives were often stated in generalities. Teaching methods were diverse and innovative, and several new combinations of learning activities were created to highlight ethics topics. Content represented managed care and non-managed care topics in varying proportions. Student surveys of attitudes toward managed care and opinions of the ethics programs were the most commonly used as evaluation tools. Some schools were able to develop more direct means of evaluating student learning. The Four Component Model was not fully addressed in the programs developed by the participating schools. Conclusions: We make recommendations about the objectives, teaching methods, content, and evaluation methods of an ideal medical school curriculum in ethics.

AB - Background and Objectives: Ethics education for medical students has included a number of relatively vague descriptions of appropriate curricular objectives, but medical schools struggle with the general teaching of ethics, as well as with presenting the ethical dilemmas posed by managed care. This paper proposes some standards and uses them to analyze the general and managed care ethics content of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) curricula. Methods: We analyzed progress and final reports from each school to define their learning objectives, content, teaching methods, and evaluation strategies in ethics. Each was evaluated using principles of adult learning and Rest's Four Component Model of Moral Development. Good examples of curricular elements from participating schools are described. Results: Ethics curricula varied widely among the schools. Goals and objectives were often stated in generalities. Teaching methods were diverse and innovative, and several new combinations of learning activities were created to highlight ethics topics. Content represented managed care and non-managed care topics in varying proportions. Student surveys of attitudes toward managed care and opinions of the ethics programs were the most commonly used as evaluation tools. Some schools were able to develop more direct means of evaluating student learning. The Four Component Model was not fully addressed in the programs developed by the participating schools. Conclusions: We make recommendations about the objectives, teaching methods, content, and evaluation methods of an ideal medical school curriculum in ethics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842278655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842278655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14961401

AN - SCOPUS:0842278655

VL - 36

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - SUPPL.

ER -