Two studies examining the error theory underlying the measurement model of the verbal aggressiveness scale

Michael Beatty, Paola Pascual-Ferra, Timothy R. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations


Meta-analysis indicates moderate correlations between the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale (VAS) and other self-report measures but near-zero correlations with behavioral measures. Accurately interpreting correlations between the VAS and other variables, however, requires an examination of the untested error theory underlying the measurement model for the VAS. In two separate studies, the results of single-factor correlated uniqueness confirmatory factor analytic models revealed a pattern of significant error covariances indicating that VAS item scores are confounded by systematic error attributable to multiple unspecified latent effects. After pruning the item sets, we identified 4 items that were free of latent variable influences other than trait verbal aggressiveness. Implications for interpreting the verbal aggressiveness literature are discussed along with recommendations for revising the VAS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-81
Number of pages27
JournalHuman Communication Research
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015


ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Anthropology

Cite this