Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dialetheism is the view according to which some contradictions (i.e., statements of the form, A and not-A) are true. In this paper, I discuss three strategies to block dialetheism: (i) Contradictions cannot be true because some theories of truth preclude them from emerging. (ii) Contradictions cannot be true because we cannot see what it is like to perceive them. Although that does not undercut the possibility that there are true contradictions that we cannot perceive, it makes their introduction a genuine cost. (iii) Contradictions cannot be true because if they were, we would end up sliding down into believing that everything is true (trivialism). Even if the dialetheist is not committed to that slippery slope, it is crucial that the dialetheist establishes that trivialism is unacceptable; but it is not clear how that could be done successfully. Graham Priest has considered these strategies (in his Doubt Truth to be a Liar), but I argue that none of his responses successfully block them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics
PublisherSpringer New York LLC
Pages465-476
Number of pages12
Volume152
ISBN (Print)9788132227175
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Event5th World Congress on Paraconsistency, WCP 2014 - Kolkata, India
Duration: Feb 13 2014Feb 17 2014

Other

Other5th World Congress on Paraconsistency, WCP 2014
CountryIndia
CityKolkata
Period2/13/142/17/14

Fingerprint

Slope
Costs
Truth
Strategy
Form

Keywords

  • Dialetheism
  • Graham priest
  • Perceptual illusions
  • Trivialism
  • Truth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

Bueno, O. (2015). Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. In Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics (Vol. 152, pp. 465-476). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21

Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. / Bueno, Otavio.

Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 152 Springer New York LLC, 2015. p. 465-476.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bueno, O 2015, Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. in Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. vol. 152, Springer New York LLC, pp. 465-476, 5th World Congress on Paraconsistency, WCP 2014, Kolkata, India, 2/13/14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21
Bueno O. Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. In Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 152. Springer New York LLC. 2015. p. 465-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21
Bueno, Otavio. / Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. Vol. 152 Springer New York LLC, 2015. pp. 465-476
@inbook{6f047afbcc5d4511baafaa66a56eb7a1,
title = "Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions",
abstract = "Dialetheism is the view according to which some contradictions (i.e., statements of the form, A and not-A) are true. In this paper, I discuss three strategies to block dialetheism: (i) Contradictions cannot be true because some theories of truth preclude them from emerging. (ii) Contradictions cannot be true because we cannot see what it is like to perceive them. Although that does not undercut the possibility that there are true contradictions that we cannot perceive, it makes their introduction a genuine cost. (iii) Contradictions cannot be true because if they were, we would end up sliding down into believing that everything is true (trivialism). Even if the dialetheist is not committed to that slippery slope, it is crucial that the dialetheist establishes that trivialism is unacceptable; but it is not clear how that could be done successfully. Graham Priest has considered these strategies (in his Doubt Truth to be a Liar), but I argue that none of his responses successfully block them.",
keywords = "Dialetheism, Graham priest, Perceptual illusions, Trivialism, Truth",
author = "Otavio Bueno",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9788132227175",
volume = "152",
pages = "465--476",
booktitle = "Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Truth, trivialism, and perceptual illusions

AU - Bueno, Otavio

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Dialetheism is the view according to which some contradictions (i.e., statements of the form, A and not-A) are true. In this paper, I discuss three strategies to block dialetheism: (i) Contradictions cannot be true because some theories of truth preclude them from emerging. (ii) Contradictions cannot be true because we cannot see what it is like to perceive them. Although that does not undercut the possibility that there are true contradictions that we cannot perceive, it makes their introduction a genuine cost. (iii) Contradictions cannot be true because if they were, we would end up sliding down into believing that everything is true (trivialism). Even if the dialetheist is not committed to that slippery slope, it is crucial that the dialetheist establishes that trivialism is unacceptable; but it is not clear how that could be done successfully. Graham Priest has considered these strategies (in his Doubt Truth to be a Liar), but I argue that none of his responses successfully block them.

AB - Dialetheism is the view according to which some contradictions (i.e., statements of the form, A and not-A) are true. In this paper, I discuss three strategies to block dialetheism: (i) Contradictions cannot be true because some theories of truth preclude them from emerging. (ii) Contradictions cannot be true because we cannot see what it is like to perceive them. Although that does not undercut the possibility that there are true contradictions that we cannot perceive, it makes their introduction a genuine cost. (iii) Contradictions cannot be true because if they were, we would end up sliding down into believing that everything is true (trivialism). Even if the dialetheist is not committed to that slippery slope, it is crucial that the dialetheist establishes that trivialism is unacceptable; but it is not clear how that could be done successfully. Graham Priest has considered these strategies (in his Doubt Truth to be a Liar), but I argue that none of his responses successfully block them.

KW - Dialetheism

KW - Graham priest

KW - Perceptual illusions

KW - Trivialism

KW - Truth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959094267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959094267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21

DO - 10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_21

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84959094267

SN - 9788132227175

VL - 152

SP - 465

EP - 476

BT - Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics

PB - Springer New York LLC

ER -