Trends in pediatric liver transplant donors and deceased donor circumstance of death in the United States, 2002-2015

Dor Yoeli, Matthew Goss, Nhu Thao N. Galván, Moreshwar S. Desai, Tamir A. Miloh, Abbas Rana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

While much of the discussion regarding expanding the donor pool for pediatric liver transplantation has surrounded the use of technical variant grafts, little attention has been directed toward changes in the deceased donor population. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in the circumstance of the death of deceased donors used for pediatric liver transplantation. All pediatric liver transplant recipients transplanted between 2002 and 2015 were identified in the UNOS database and were categorized based on the donor circumstance of death. There was no significant correlation between year of transplantation and number of pediatric liver transplants performed, pediatric donors, split livers, or living donors. There was a significant downward trend in donors from motor vehicle fatalities and an upward trend in suicide, non-MVA, and death due to natural causes. There was also an upward trend in drowning, one of the most common mechanisms of death among non-MVA in 2015. While the number of donors who died in MVA has fallen, the number of deceased donors who died from suicide, natural causes, and non-MVA, especially drowning, has increased, maintaining the overall number of pediatric deceased donor livers transplanted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere13156
JournalPediatric Transplantation
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • drowning
  • living donor
  • motor vehicle accidents
  • organ donation
  • pediatric liver transplantation
  • split liver transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in pediatric liver transplant donors and deceased donor circumstance of death in the United States, 2002-2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this