Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population

Tsun Yee Law, Samuel Rosas, Zachary S. Hubbard, Lee Onn Chieng, Harvey Chim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of both approaches. Methods A retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, IN) was performed for patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) from 2005-2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were evaluated. Results Our query returned 1,500,603 carpal tunnel syndrome patients, of which 507,924 (33.8%) and 68,768 (4.6%) were surgically managed with OCTR and ECTR respectively (remainder treated conservatively). Compound annual growth rate was significantly higher in ECTR (5%) than OCTR (0.9%; P < 0.001). Average charges were higher in OCTR (3820) than ECTR (2952), whereas reimbursements were higher in ECTR (mean 1643) than OCTR (mean 1312). Both were performed most commonly in the age range of 65-69 y, females, and southern geographic region. Conclusions ECTR is growing faster than OCTR in the Medicare population. Contrary to previous literature, our study shows that ECTR had lower charges and reimbursed at a higher rate than OCTR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-13
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume214
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2017

Fingerprint

Medicare
Wrist
Population
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Learning Curve
Growth
Demography

Keywords

  • Carpal tunnel
  • Endoscopic carpal tunnel release
  • Medicare
  • Open carpal tunnel release
  • Outcomes research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population. / Law, Tsun Yee; Rosas, Samuel; Hubbard, Zachary S.; Chieng, Lee Onn; Chim, Harvey.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 214, 15.06.2017, p. 9-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Law, Tsun Yee ; Rosas, Samuel ; Hubbard, Zachary S. ; Chieng, Lee Onn ; Chim, Harvey. / Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2017 ; Vol. 214. pp. 9-13.
@article{61c099b22df94a0a860d900ab7341183,
title = "Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population",
abstract = "Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of both approaches. Methods A retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, IN) was performed for patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) from 2005-2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were evaluated. Results Our query returned 1,500,603 carpal tunnel syndrome patients, of which 507,924 (33.8{\%}) and 68,768 (4.6{\%}) were surgically managed with OCTR and ECTR respectively (remainder treated conservatively). Compound annual growth rate was significantly higher in ECTR (5{\%}) than OCTR (0.9{\%}; P < 0.001). Average charges were higher in OCTR (3820) than ECTR (2952), whereas reimbursements were higher in ECTR (mean 1643) than OCTR (mean 1312). Both were performed most commonly in the age range of 65-69 y, females, and southern geographic region. Conclusions ECTR is growing faster than OCTR in the Medicare population. Contrary to previous literature, our study shows that ECTR had lower charges and reimbursed at a higher rate than OCTR.",
keywords = "Carpal tunnel, Endoscopic carpal tunnel release, Medicare, Open carpal tunnel release, Outcomes research",
author = "Law, {Tsun Yee} and Samuel Rosas and Hubbard, {Zachary S.} and Chieng, {Lee Onn} and Harvey Chim",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "214",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population

AU - Law, Tsun Yee

AU - Rosas, Samuel

AU - Hubbard, Zachary S.

AU - Chieng, Lee Onn

AU - Chim, Harvey

PY - 2017/6/15

Y1 - 2017/6/15

N2 - Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of both approaches. Methods A retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, IN) was performed for patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) from 2005-2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were evaluated. Results Our query returned 1,500,603 carpal tunnel syndrome patients, of which 507,924 (33.8%) and 68,768 (4.6%) were surgically managed with OCTR and ECTR respectively (remainder treated conservatively). Compound annual growth rate was significantly higher in ECTR (5%) than OCTR (0.9%; P < 0.001). Average charges were higher in OCTR (3820) than ECTR (2952), whereas reimbursements were higher in ECTR (mean 1643) than OCTR (mean 1312). Both were performed most commonly in the age range of 65-69 y, females, and southern geographic region. Conclusions ECTR is growing faster than OCTR in the Medicare population. Contrary to previous literature, our study shows that ECTR had lower charges and reimbursed at a higher rate than OCTR.

AB - Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of both approaches. Methods A retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, IN) was performed for patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) from 2005-2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were evaluated. Results Our query returned 1,500,603 carpal tunnel syndrome patients, of which 507,924 (33.8%) and 68,768 (4.6%) were surgically managed with OCTR and ECTR respectively (remainder treated conservatively). Compound annual growth rate was significantly higher in ECTR (5%) than OCTR (0.9%; P < 0.001). Average charges were higher in OCTR (3820) than ECTR (2952), whereas reimbursements were higher in ECTR (mean 1643) than OCTR (mean 1312). Both were performed most commonly in the age range of 65-69 y, females, and southern geographic region. Conclusions ECTR is growing faster than OCTR in the Medicare population. Contrary to previous literature, our study shows that ECTR had lower charges and reimbursed at a higher rate than OCTR.

KW - Carpal tunnel

KW - Endoscopic carpal tunnel release

KW - Medicare

KW - Open carpal tunnel release

KW - Outcomes research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016074173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016074173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.055

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.055

M3 - Article

C2 - 28624065

AN - SCOPUS:85016074173

VL - 214

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -