Transmission rate allocation in multisensor target tracking over a shared network

M. Chamara Ranasingha, Manohar Murthi, Kamal Premaratne, Xingzhe Fan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a multisensor target tracking application running on a shared network, at what bit rates should the sensors send their measurements to the tracking fusion center? Clearly, the sensors cannot use arbitrary rates in a shared network, and a standard network rate control algorithm may not provide rates amenable to effective target tracking. For Kalman filter-based multisensor target tracking, we derive a utility function that captures the tracking quality of service as a function of the sensor bit rates. We incorporate this utility function into a network rate resource allocation framework, deriving a distributed rate control algorithm for a shared network that is suitable for current best effort packet networks, such as the Internet. In simulation studies, the new rate control algorithm engenders significantly better tracking performance than a standard rate control method, while the ordinary data transfer flows continue to effectively operate while using their standard rate control methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-362
Number of pages15
JournalIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Target tracking
Sensors
Packet networks
Data transfer
Kalman filters
Resource allocation
Quality of service
Fusion reactions
Internet

Keywords

  • Convex optimization
  • Data fusion
  • Kalman filtering (KF)
  • Network utility maximization (NUM)
  • Networked signal processing
  • Target tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Information Systems
  • Software

Cite this

Transmission rate allocation in multisensor target tracking over a shared network. / Ranasingha, M. Chamara; Murthi, Manohar; Premaratne, Kamal; Fan, Xingzhe.

In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.01.2009, p. 348-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8103f2ce1557479ab36806967569454c,
title = "Transmission rate allocation in multisensor target tracking over a shared network",
abstract = "In a multisensor target tracking application running on a shared network, at what bit rates should the sensors send their measurements to the tracking fusion center? Clearly, the sensors cannot use arbitrary rates in a shared network, and a standard network rate control algorithm may not provide rates amenable to effective target tracking. For Kalman filter-based multisensor target tracking, we derive a utility function that captures the tracking quality of service as a function of the sensor bit rates. We incorporate this utility function into a network rate resource allocation framework, deriving a distributed rate control algorithm for a shared network that is suitable for current best effort packet networks, such as the Internet. In simulation studies, the new rate control algorithm engenders significantly better tracking performance than a standard rate control method, while the ordinary data transfer flows continue to effectively operate while using their standard rate control methods.",
keywords = "Convex optimization, Data fusion, Kalman filtering (KF), Network utility maximization (NUM), Networked signal processing, Target tracking",
author = "Ranasingha, {M. Chamara} and Manohar Murthi and Kamal Premaratne and Xingzhe Fan",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2005123",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "348--362",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics",
issn = "1083-4419",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transmission rate allocation in multisensor target tracking over a shared network

AU - Ranasingha, M. Chamara

AU - Murthi, Manohar

AU - Premaratne, Kamal

AU - Fan, Xingzhe

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - In a multisensor target tracking application running on a shared network, at what bit rates should the sensors send their measurements to the tracking fusion center? Clearly, the sensors cannot use arbitrary rates in a shared network, and a standard network rate control algorithm may not provide rates amenable to effective target tracking. For Kalman filter-based multisensor target tracking, we derive a utility function that captures the tracking quality of service as a function of the sensor bit rates. We incorporate this utility function into a network rate resource allocation framework, deriving a distributed rate control algorithm for a shared network that is suitable for current best effort packet networks, such as the Internet. In simulation studies, the new rate control algorithm engenders significantly better tracking performance than a standard rate control method, while the ordinary data transfer flows continue to effectively operate while using their standard rate control methods.

AB - In a multisensor target tracking application running on a shared network, at what bit rates should the sensors send their measurements to the tracking fusion center? Clearly, the sensors cannot use arbitrary rates in a shared network, and a standard network rate control algorithm may not provide rates amenable to effective target tracking. For Kalman filter-based multisensor target tracking, we derive a utility function that captures the tracking quality of service as a function of the sensor bit rates. We incorporate this utility function into a network rate resource allocation framework, deriving a distributed rate control algorithm for a shared network that is suitable for current best effort packet networks, such as the Internet. In simulation studies, the new rate control algorithm engenders significantly better tracking performance than a standard rate control method, while the ordinary data transfer flows continue to effectively operate while using their standard rate control methods.

KW - Convex optimization

KW - Data fusion

KW - Kalman filtering (KF)

KW - Network utility maximization (NUM)

KW - Networked signal processing

KW - Target tracking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64049090888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64049090888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2005123

DO - 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2005123

M3 - Article

C2 - 19095557

AN - SCOPUS:64049090888

VL - 39

SP - 348

EP - 362

JO - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics

JF - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics

SN - 1083-4419

IS - 2

ER -