Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure

Ibrahim Guven, Emrah Celik, Eidogan Madenci

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents a performance evaluation of sandwich panels under blast pressure when core material, core pattern, and core wall thickness are varied. Also considered is the effect of a protective ceramic layer on the blast side of the panel Two core materials are considered: aluminum and foam. When assessing core pattern, corrugated and aluminum grid cores with a various number of corrugations/cells are examined. Also, the effects of three distinct core wall thicknesses, i.e., 0.50 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.10 mm, are investigated. The best performance is observed in a panel with 20 corrugations along a 1-m stretch (5-cm pitch), 0.50-mm wall thickness, and the protective ceramic layer. Weight penalty vs. performance gain and energy considerations are briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCollection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
Pages5052-5061
Number of pages10
Volume7
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
Event47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Newport, RI, United States
Duration: May 1 2006May 4 2006

Other

Other47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
CountryUnited States
CityNewport, RI
Period5/1/065/4/06

Fingerprint

Transient analysis
Aluminum
Composite materials
Foams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture

Cite this

Guven, I., Celik, E., & Madenci, E. (2006). Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference (Vol. 7, pp. 5052-5061)

Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure. / Guven, Ibrahim; Celik, Emrah; Madenci, Eidogan.

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Vol. 7 2006. p. 5052-5061.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Guven, I, Celik, E & Madenci, E 2006, Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure. in Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. vol. 7, pp. 5052-5061, 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Newport, RI, United States, 5/1/06.
Guven I, Celik E, Madenci E. Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Vol. 7. 2006. p. 5052-5061
Guven, Ibrahim ; Celik, Emrah ; Madenci, Eidogan. / Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Vol. 7 2006. pp. 5052-5061
@inproceedings{fda9a9cdfcf446d7bb496aad166eb5e5,
title = "Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure",
abstract = "This study presents a performance evaluation of sandwich panels under blast pressure when core material, core pattern, and core wall thickness are varied. Also considered is the effect of a protective ceramic layer on the blast side of the panel Two core materials are considered: aluminum and foam. When assessing core pattern, corrugated and aluminum grid cores with a various number of corrugations/cells are examined. Also, the effects of three distinct core wall thicknesses, i.e., 0.50 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.10 mm, are investigated. The best performance is observed in a panel with 20 corrugations along a 1-m stretch (5-cm pitch), 0.50-mm wall thickness, and the protective ceramic layer. Weight penalty vs. performance gain and energy considerations are briefly discussed.",
author = "Ibrahim Guven and Emrah Celik and Eidogan Madenci",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1563478080",
volume = "7",
pages = "5052--5061",
booktitle = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Transient response of composite sandwich panels subjected to blast wave pressure

AU - Guven, Ibrahim

AU - Celik, Emrah

AU - Madenci, Eidogan

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This study presents a performance evaluation of sandwich panels under blast pressure when core material, core pattern, and core wall thickness are varied. Also considered is the effect of a protective ceramic layer on the blast side of the panel Two core materials are considered: aluminum and foam. When assessing core pattern, corrugated and aluminum grid cores with a various number of corrugations/cells are examined. Also, the effects of three distinct core wall thicknesses, i.e., 0.50 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.10 mm, are investigated. The best performance is observed in a panel with 20 corrugations along a 1-m stretch (5-cm pitch), 0.50-mm wall thickness, and the protective ceramic layer. Weight penalty vs. performance gain and energy considerations are briefly discussed.

AB - This study presents a performance evaluation of sandwich panels under blast pressure when core material, core pattern, and core wall thickness are varied. Also considered is the effect of a protective ceramic layer on the blast side of the panel Two core materials are considered: aluminum and foam. When assessing core pattern, corrugated and aluminum grid cores with a various number of corrugations/cells are examined. Also, the effects of three distinct core wall thicknesses, i.e., 0.50 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.10 mm, are investigated. The best performance is observed in a panel with 20 corrugations along a 1-m stretch (5-cm pitch), 0.50-mm wall thickness, and the protective ceramic layer. Weight penalty vs. performance gain and energy considerations are briefly discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147211019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147211019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:34147211019

SN - 1563478080

SN - 9781563478086

VL - 7

SP - 5052

EP - 5061

BT - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

ER -