Abstract
Background: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Methods: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40–50 mg/m2 by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. Findings: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9–15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6–9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36–0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Funding: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 541-553 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | The Lancet |
Volume | 399 |
Issue number | 10324 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 5 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS) : an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial. / Gershenson, David M.; Miller, Austin; Brady, William E.; Paul, James; Carty, Karen; Rodgers, William; Millan, David; Coleman, Robert L.; Moore, Kathleen N.; Banerjee, Susana; Connolly, Kate; Secord, Angeles Alvarez; O'Malley, David M.; Dorigo, Oliver; Gaillard, Stephanie; Gabra, Hani; Slomovitz, Brian; Hanjani, Parviz; Farley, John; Churchman, Michael; Ewing, Ailith; Hollis, Robert L.; Herrington, C. Simon; Huang, Helen Q.; Wenzel, Lari; Gourley, Charlie.
In: The Lancet, Vol. 399, No. 10324, 05.02.2022, p. 541-553.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS)
T2 - an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
AU - Gershenson, David M.
AU - Miller, Austin
AU - Brady, William E.
AU - Paul, James
AU - Carty, Karen
AU - Rodgers, William
AU - Millan, David
AU - Coleman, Robert L.
AU - Moore, Kathleen N.
AU - Banerjee, Susana
AU - Connolly, Kate
AU - Secord, Angeles Alvarez
AU - O'Malley, David M.
AU - Dorigo, Oliver
AU - Gaillard, Stephanie
AU - Gabra, Hani
AU - Slomovitz, Brian
AU - Hanjani, Parviz
AU - Farley, John
AU - Churchman, Michael
AU - Ewing, Ailith
AU - Hollis, Robert L.
AU - Herrington, C. Simon
AU - Huang, Helen Q.
AU - Wenzel, Lari
AU - Gourley, Charlie
N1 - Funding Information: DMG reports payments made to his institution from the National Cancer Institute (NRG Oncology), Novartis, and the GOG Foundation for this study; royalties or licenses from Elsevier and UpToDate outside the submitted work; consulting fees from Genentech outside the submitted work; personal fees for service as a member of the Committee of the National Cancer Institute outside the submitted work; and stock or stock options from Johnson & Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Biogen outside the submitted work. AM reports service as a masked study statistician for VBL Therapeutics; provision of statistical institutional support for Advaxis; service as a data safety monitoring board reporting statistician for Regeneron; and service on a study steering committee for Genentech and AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. RLC reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck–GlaxoSmithKline, and Clovis; grants from Genmab, Genentech–Roche, Janssen, Agenus, Regeneron, and OncoQuest; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Merck–GlaxoSmithKline, and Clovis; and service on a data safety monitoring board or an advisory board for Janssen, VBL Therapeutics, and AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. KNM reports service on advisory boards for Alkemeres, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Blueprint Medicines, Eisai, Elevar, GlaxoSmithKline–Tesaro, Genentech–Roche, Hengrui, Immunogen, IMab, Merck, Mereo, Mersana, Myriad, OncXerna, Onconova, Novartis, Sorrento, Tarveda, and VBL Therapeutics, all outside the submitted work; grant funding from PTC Therapeutics, Lilly, Merck, and Genentech–Roche outside the submitted work; funding paid to her institution from Cyteir, Immunocore, Bolt Bio, Amgen, Artios, GlaxoSmithKline–Tesaro, Mereo, Regeneron, Aravive, Verastem, and AstraZeneca, for all of which she also serves as a local principal investigator; serving as national principal investigator for the IMaGYN050 trial of ovarian cancer (Genentech–Roche), the MIRASOL trial of ovarian cancer (Immunogen), the Relevare study of ovarian cancer (OncXerna), the FIRST study of ovarian cancer (GlaxoSmithKline–Tesaro), and the ETCTN 10422 study of ovarian cancer (National Cancer Institute); being the associate director for GOG Partners, on the GOG Foundation board of directors, and the NRG Oncology chair of the ovarian cancer committee; and receiving speaking reimbursement from PER, Research to Practice, Medscape, Great Debates and Updates, and Gyn Mal, all of which are outside the scope of this work but were active during the conduct of this study. SB reports grants paid to their institution from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees for participation in advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Mersana, Oncxerna, Seagen, Shattuck Lab, and Epsilogen; and personal fees for lectures from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mersana, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda, all outside the submitted work. AAS reports a National Cancer Trial Network grant; grants paid to her institution from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis, Eisai, Immutep, Merck, OncoQuest, PharmaMar, Genentech–Roche, Seagen, Tesaro–GlaxoSmithKline, and VBL Therapeutics; consulting fees from Aravive, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Cordgenics, Eisai, Merck, Mersana, Myriad, Oncoquest, Genentech–Roche, and Tesaro–GlaxoSmithKline; presentations for educational events on cervical cancer sponsored by Research to Practice; service on advisory boards (uncompensated) for AbbVie and Regeneron; service on clinical trial steering committees (all uncompensated) for the AtTEnd trial (Hoffman-LaRoche), the Oval Trial (VBL Therapeutics), and the FLORA-5 trial (Oncoquest); and service on the GOG Foundation Board of Directors, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology Board of Directors, and the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Foundation Board of Trustees, all outside the submitted work. DMO reports National Cancer Institute support for this clinical trial; research funding paid to their institution from AstraZeneca, Tesaro–GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Janssen–Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie Regeneron, Amgen, Novocure, Genentech–Roche, VentiRx Array Biopharma EMD Serono, Ergomed, Ajinomoto, Ludwig Cancer Research Stemcentrx, Cerulean Pharma, the GOG Foundation, the National Cancer Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb, C Serono, TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Yale University, New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance, inVentiv Health Clinical, Iovance Biotherapeutics, PRA Intl, Eisai, Agenus, Merck, GenMab, SeaGen, Mersana, and Clovis; personal fees for consulting or advisory board membership, or both, from AstraZeneca, Tesaro–GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Ambry, Janssen–Johnson & Johnson, BBI, Agenus, AbbVie, Regeneron, Amgen, Novocure, Genentech–Roche, GOG Foundation, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Myriad Genetics, Eisai, Agenus, Tarveda, Merck, SeaGen, Novartis, Mersana, Clovis, Rubius, and Elevar, all outside the submitted work. OD reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Clovis, Genentech, AbbVie, IMV, Millenium, and Pharmamar; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Tesaro–GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca; payment for expert testimony in one legal case unrelated to the current study; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck, Clovis, PACT, and Genentech, all outside the submitted work. SG reports financial support paid to her institution for the present study from the National Clinical Trials Network; grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Pfizer, Rigel, Iovance, Tesaro, Genentech–Roche, PharmaMar, and GlaxoSmithKline; patents licensed to Sermonix (US patent numbers 10,905,659 and 10,258,604); participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Sermonix, Elevar Therapeutics, and GlaxoSmithKline; and service as an NRG Oncology phase 1 subcommittee co-chair, all outside the submitted work. BS reports personal fees for service on advisory boards for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bostongene, Clovis, Eisai, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceticals, Lilly, Merck, Myriad, Novartis, Nuvation, Onconova, and Seagen; and consulting for the GOG Foundation, all outside the submitted work. AE reports grants or contracts from UKRI for a post-doctoral fellowship outside the submitted work. CG reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis for this study (trametinib, the test drug, was sold by GlaxoSmithKline to Novartis during the course of the study). WEB, JP, KCa, WR, DM, KCo, HG, PH, JF, MC, RLH, CSH, HQH, and LW declare no competing interests. Funding Information: NRG Oncology (formerly the Gynecologic Oncology Group), in the USA, in collaboration with the UK National Cancer Research Institute, designed and conducted this trial. In the USA, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Foundation provided supplemental financial support to NRG Oncology (U10CA180822, NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center; U10CA180868, NRG Oncology Operations). In the UK, infrastructure support was provided by the National Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (C9422/A15800) and the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Network, which is jointly funded by Cancer Research UK, the National Institute for Health Research In England, and the Departments of Health for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The study was coordinated by the Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit at the University of Glasgow with an educational grant from Novartis UK. The whole exome sequencing of samples was 50% funded by a Target Ovarian Cancer Translational Award. The following NRG Oncology (US) and National Cancer Research Institute (UK) member institutions participated in the primary treatment studies: MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust?Chelsea, Western General Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suter Cancer Research Consortium, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Hammersmith Hospital, Abington Memorial Hospital?Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, California Pacific Medical Center?Pacific Campus, Christie Hospital, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Musgrove Park Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Duke Raleigh Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Nottingham City Hospital, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers?Boulder, UCSF Medical Center?Mission Bay, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine?Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Deerfield Beach, West Michigan Cancer Center, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Abramson Cancer Center of The University of Pennsylvania, Addenbrookes Hospital?Medical School, Center of Hope at Renown Medical Center, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center-Fairview Hospital, Evanston Hospital at NorthShore University HealthSystem, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Jewish Hospital Medical Center Northeast, Northside Hospital, Palo Alto Medical Foundation?Gynecologic Oncology, Saint Bartholomew's Hospital, Sparrow Hospital, Sutter General Hospital, The Methodist Hospital System, University of Mississippi Medical Center, University of New Mexico, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Women and Infants Hospital, Aurora Baycare Medical Center, Aurora Women's Pavilion of Aurora West Allis Medical Center, Baystate Medical Center, Belfast City Hospital, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Carle Cancer Center, Chester County Hospital, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, CoxHealth South Hospital, Dartmouth?Hitchcock Medical Center, Hartford Hospital, John B Amos Cancer Center, Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Regional Care Center?Sugar Land, Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates Des Moines, Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center, Mercy Health System, MetroHealth Medical Center, MultiCare Tacoma General Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem?Glenbrook Hospital, Northwest Hospital, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville, Palo Alto Medical Foundation?Santa Cruz, Parkland Memorial Hospital, PeaceHealth Saint Joseph Medical Center, Penrose?Saint Francis Healthcare, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers?Sky Ridge, Saint Francis Cancer Center, Saint James's University Hospital, Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital, Saint Vincent Oncology Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Spectrum Health at Butterworth Campus, Sudarshan K Sharma at Gynecologic Oncology, Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, The Nebraska Medical Center, University of Arizona Medical Center?University Campus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and University of Rochester. Funding Information: NRG Oncology (formerly the Gynecologic Oncology Group), in the USA, in collaboration with the UK National Cancer Research Institute, designed and conducted this trial. In the USA, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Foundation provided supplemental financial support to NRG Oncology (U10CA180822, NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center; U10CA180868, NRG Oncology Operations). In the UK, infrastructure support was provided by the National Cancer Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (C9422/A15800) and the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Network, which is jointly funded by Cancer Research UK, the National Institute for Health Research In England, and the Departments of Health for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The study was coordinated by the Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit at the University of Glasgow with an educational grant from Novartis UK. The whole exome sequencing of samples was 50% funded by a Target Ovarian Cancer Translational Award. The following NRG Oncology (US) and National Cancer Research Institute (UK) member institutions participated in the primary treatment studies: MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust–Chelsea, Western General Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Suter Cancer Research Consortium, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Hammersmith Hospital, Abington Memorial Hospital–Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, California Pacific Medical Center–Pacific Campus, Christie Hospital, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Musgrove Park Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Duke Raleigh Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Nottingham City Hospital, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers–Boulder, UCSF Medical Center–Mission Bay, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine–Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Deerfield Beach, West Michigan Cancer Center, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Abramson Cancer Center of The University of Pennsylvania, Addenbrookes Hospital–Medical School, Center of Hope at Renown Medical Center, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center-Fairview Hospital, Evanston Hospital at NorthShore University HealthSystem, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Jewish Hospital Medical Center Northeast, Northside Hospital, Palo Alto Medical Foundation–Gynecologic Oncology, Saint Bartholomew's Hospital, Sparrow Hospital, Sutter General Hospital, The Methodist Hospital System, University of Mississippi Medical Center, University of New Mexico, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Women and Infants Hospital, Aurora Baycare Medical Center, Aurora Women's Pavilion of Aurora West Allis Medical Center, Baystate Medical Center, Belfast City Hospital, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Carle Cancer Center, Chester County Hospital, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, CoxHealth South Hospital, Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Hartford Hospital, John B Amos Cancer Center, Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Regional Care Center–Sugar Land, Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates Des Moines, Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center, Mercy Health System, MetroHealth Medical Center, MultiCare Tacoma General Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem–Glenbrook Hospital, Northwest Hospital, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville, Palo Alto Medical Foundation–Santa Cruz, Parkland Memorial Hospital, PeaceHealth Saint Joseph Medical Center, Penrose–Saint Francis Healthcare, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers–Sky Ridge, Saint Francis Cancer Center, Saint James's University Hospital, Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital, Saint Vincent Oncology Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Spectrum Health at Butterworth Campus, Sudarshan K Sharma at Gynecologic Oncology, Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, The Nebraska Medical Center, University of Arizona Medical Center–University Campus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and University of Rochester. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2022/2/5
Y1 - 2022/2/5
N2 - Background: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Methods: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40–50 mg/m2 by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. Findings: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9–15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6–9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36–0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Funding: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis.
AB - Background: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Methods: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40–50 mg/m2 by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. Findings: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9–15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6–9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36–0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. Funding: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123927243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123927243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 35123694
AN - SCOPUS:85123927243
VL - 399
SP - 541
EP - 553
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
SN - 0140-6736
IS - 10324
ER -