TOWARD A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION DESIGN.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of programs in the public sector has been problematic and often invalid, primarily due to the fact that the evaluation plans or designs are lacking. The broad field of program evaluation is reviewed along with attempts to synthesize and systematize the steps necessary to develop valid and comprehensive evaluation designs. First, a design framework is identified which links program characteristics to design elements through an expanded set of threats to validity. Second, the various design elements are grouped into five systematically convenient components, including test hypotheses, selection scheme, measures framework, measurement methods, and analytic techniques. Third, it is proposed that the different types of evaluation can be contained in an evaluation taxonomy composed of eight measures-related classifications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-515
Number of pages22
JournalIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
VolumeSMC-9
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taxonomies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

TOWARD A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION DESIGN. / Tien, James M.

In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-9, No. 9, 01.09.1979, p. 494-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0405e04a1e2f46c2902d1c404bbd0780,
title = "TOWARD A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION DESIGN.",
abstract = "The evaluation of programs in the public sector has been problematic and often invalid, primarily due to the fact that the evaluation plans or designs are lacking. The broad field of program evaluation is reviewed along with attempts to synthesize and systematize the steps necessary to develop valid and comprehensive evaluation designs. First, a design framework is identified which links program characteristics to design elements through an expanded set of threats to validity. Second, the various design elements are grouped into five systematically convenient components, including test hypotheses, selection scheme, measures framework, measurement methods, and analytic techniques. Third, it is proposed that the different types of evaluation can be contained in an evaluation taxonomy composed of eight measures-related classifications.",
author = "Tien, {James M.}",
year = "1979",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "SMC-9",
pages = "494--515",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics",
issn = "0018-9472",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TOWARD A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION DESIGN.

AU - Tien, James M.

PY - 1979/9/1

Y1 - 1979/9/1

N2 - The evaluation of programs in the public sector has been problematic and often invalid, primarily due to the fact that the evaluation plans or designs are lacking. The broad field of program evaluation is reviewed along with attempts to synthesize and systematize the steps necessary to develop valid and comprehensive evaluation designs. First, a design framework is identified which links program characteristics to design elements through an expanded set of threats to validity. Second, the various design elements are grouped into five systematically convenient components, including test hypotheses, selection scheme, measures framework, measurement methods, and analytic techniques. Third, it is proposed that the different types of evaluation can be contained in an evaluation taxonomy composed of eight measures-related classifications.

AB - The evaluation of programs in the public sector has been problematic and often invalid, primarily due to the fact that the evaluation plans or designs are lacking. The broad field of program evaluation is reviewed along with attempts to synthesize and systematize the steps necessary to develop valid and comprehensive evaluation designs. First, a design framework is identified which links program characteristics to design elements through an expanded set of threats to validity. Second, the various design elements are grouped into five systematically convenient components, including test hypotheses, selection scheme, measures framework, measurement methods, and analytic techniques. Third, it is proposed that the different types of evaluation can be contained in an evaluation taxonomy composed of eight measures-related classifications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018516675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018516675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - SMC-9

SP - 494

EP - 515

JO - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

JF - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

SN - 0018-9472

IS - 9

ER -