Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: A prospective randomized comparison

William C. Broaddus, Kathryn L. Holloway, Charles J. Winters, Ross Bullock, R. Scott Graham, Bruce E. Mathern, John D. Ward, Harold F. Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The authors designed a study to compare low-profile titanium miniplate fixation to that in which stainless steel wire is used. Methods. Before undergoing craniotomy, 40 patients gave informed consent and were randomized to receive either wire or miniplate fixation. After dural closure, bone flap fixation was timed. The bone flap was measured for inward or outward offset and mobility to manual pressure on its margin. Three months postoperatively the bone flap margins were graded for appearance or palpation of an offset and for the presence of burr hole depressions. Twenty-four patients were randomized to receive miniplate fixation and 16 to receive stainless steel wire fixation. The time required for wire fixation was approximately 40% longer than that for miniplates (11.8 ± 5.1 minutes compared with 8.3 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.02). The offset of bone flaps after wire fixation was significantly greater than that with miniplates (1.6 ± 1 mm compared with 0.3 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001), as was the mobility of the bone flap on digital pressure (1.2 ± 0.9 mm compared with 0.2 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up review, two of 12 patients had suboptimal results after wire fixation, whereas none of 14 patients had suboptimal results after miniplate fixation. When dichotomized for excellent or less-than-excellent postoperative results, the data were significantly better for patients who underwent miniplate fixation (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Titanium miniplate cranial fixation provides more accurate and rigid reapproximation of the bone edges, with results that are significantly better on close inspection or palpation. The additional cost of miniplate fixation may thus be justified in many cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-247
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume96
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 26 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stainless Steel
Titanium
Bone and Bones
Palpation
Pressure
Craniotomy
Informed Consent
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cranial fixation
  • Miniplate
  • Osteosynthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Broaddus, W. C., Holloway, K. L., Winters, C. J., Bullock, R., Graham, R. S., Mathern, B. E., ... Young, H. F. (2002). Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: A prospective randomized comparison. Journal of Neurosurgery, 96(2), 244-247.

Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation : A prospective randomized comparison. / Broaddus, William C.; Holloway, Kathryn L.; Winters, Charles J.; Bullock, Ross; Graham, R. Scott; Mathern, Bruce E.; Ward, John D.; Young, Harold F.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 96, No. 2, 26.03.2002, p. 244-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Broaddus, WC, Holloway, KL, Winters, CJ, Bullock, R, Graham, RS, Mathern, BE, Ward, JD & Young, HF 2002, 'Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: A prospective randomized comparison', Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 244-247.
Broaddus WC, Holloway KL, Winters CJ, Bullock R, Graham RS, Mathern BE et al. Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: A prospective randomized comparison. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar 26;96(2):244-247.
Broaddus, William C. ; Holloway, Kathryn L. ; Winters, Charles J. ; Bullock, Ross ; Graham, R. Scott ; Mathern, Bruce E. ; Ward, John D. ; Young, Harold F. / Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation : A prospective randomized comparison. In: Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002 ; Vol. 96, No. 2. pp. 244-247.
@article{fdfcb148b4ff4ecbabd5ca0cb6427900,
title = "Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation: A prospective randomized comparison",
abstract = "Object. The authors designed a study to compare low-profile titanium miniplate fixation to that in which stainless steel wire is used. Methods. Before undergoing craniotomy, 40 patients gave informed consent and were randomized to receive either wire or miniplate fixation. After dural closure, bone flap fixation was timed. The bone flap was measured for inward or outward offset and mobility to manual pressure on its margin. Three months postoperatively the bone flap margins were graded for appearance or palpation of an offset and for the presence of burr hole depressions. Twenty-four patients were randomized to receive miniplate fixation and 16 to receive stainless steel wire fixation. The time required for wire fixation was approximately 40{\%} longer than that for miniplates (11.8 ± 5.1 minutes compared with 8.3 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.02). The offset of bone flaps after wire fixation was significantly greater than that with miniplates (1.6 ± 1 mm compared with 0.3 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001), as was the mobility of the bone flap on digital pressure (1.2 ± 0.9 mm compared with 0.2 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up review, two of 12 patients had suboptimal results after wire fixation, whereas none of 14 patients had suboptimal results after miniplate fixation. When dichotomized for excellent or less-than-excellent postoperative results, the data were significantly better for patients who underwent miniplate fixation (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Titanium miniplate cranial fixation provides more accurate and rigid reapproximation of the bone edges, with results that are significantly better on close inspection or palpation. The additional cost of miniplate fixation may thus be justified in many cases.",
keywords = "Cranial fixation, Miniplate, Osteosynthesis",
author = "Broaddus, {William C.} and Holloway, {Kathryn L.} and Winters, {Charles J.} and Ross Bullock and Graham, {R. Scott} and Mathern, {Bruce E.} and Ward, {John D.} and Young, {Harold F.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "26",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "244--247",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Titanium miniplates or stainless steel wire for cranial fixation

T2 - A prospective randomized comparison

AU - Broaddus, William C.

AU - Holloway, Kathryn L.

AU - Winters, Charles J.

AU - Bullock, Ross

AU - Graham, R. Scott

AU - Mathern, Bruce E.

AU - Ward, John D.

AU - Young, Harold F.

PY - 2002/3/26

Y1 - 2002/3/26

N2 - Object. The authors designed a study to compare low-profile titanium miniplate fixation to that in which stainless steel wire is used. Methods. Before undergoing craniotomy, 40 patients gave informed consent and were randomized to receive either wire or miniplate fixation. After dural closure, bone flap fixation was timed. The bone flap was measured for inward or outward offset and mobility to manual pressure on its margin. Three months postoperatively the bone flap margins were graded for appearance or palpation of an offset and for the presence of burr hole depressions. Twenty-four patients were randomized to receive miniplate fixation and 16 to receive stainless steel wire fixation. The time required for wire fixation was approximately 40% longer than that for miniplates (11.8 ± 5.1 minutes compared with 8.3 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.02). The offset of bone flaps after wire fixation was significantly greater than that with miniplates (1.6 ± 1 mm compared with 0.3 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001), as was the mobility of the bone flap on digital pressure (1.2 ± 0.9 mm compared with 0.2 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up review, two of 12 patients had suboptimal results after wire fixation, whereas none of 14 patients had suboptimal results after miniplate fixation. When dichotomized for excellent or less-than-excellent postoperative results, the data were significantly better for patients who underwent miniplate fixation (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Titanium miniplate cranial fixation provides more accurate and rigid reapproximation of the bone edges, with results that are significantly better on close inspection or palpation. The additional cost of miniplate fixation may thus be justified in many cases.

AB - Object. The authors designed a study to compare low-profile titanium miniplate fixation to that in which stainless steel wire is used. Methods. Before undergoing craniotomy, 40 patients gave informed consent and were randomized to receive either wire or miniplate fixation. After dural closure, bone flap fixation was timed. The bone flap was measured for inward or outward offset and mobility to manual pressure on its margin. Three months postoperatively the bone flap margins were graded for appearance or palpation of an offset and for the presence of burr hole depressions. Twenty-four patients were randomized to receive miniplate fixation and 16 to receive stainless steel wire fixation. The time required for wire fixation was approximately 40% longer than that for miniplates (11.8 ± 5.1 minutes compared with 8.3 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.02). The offset of bone flaps after wire fixation was significantly greater than that with miniplates (1.6 ± 1 mm compared with 0.3 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001), as was the mobility of the bone flap on digital pressure (1.2 ± 0.9 mm compared with 0.2 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up review, two of 12 patients had suboptimal results after wire fixation, whereas none of 14 patients had suboptimal results after miniplate fixation. When dichotomized for excellent or less-than-excellent postoperative results, the data were significantly better for patients who underwent miniplate fixation (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Titanium miniplate cranial fixation provides more accurate and rigid reapproximation of the bone edges, with results that are significantly better on close inspection or palpation. The additional cost of miniplate fixation may thus be justified in many cases.

KW - Cranial fixation

KW - Miniplate

KW - Osteosynthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036119990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036119990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11838797

AN - SCOPUS:0036119990

VL - 96

SP - 244

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 2

ER -