Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction

Blair Calancie, William Harris, G. Fred Brindle, Barth A Green, Howard Landy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess spinal cord motor tract function in individuals undergoing spine surgery, with emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were elicited using standard technique. Muscle electromyographic values were measured in response to a three- or four-pulse train of stimulation delivered to the motor cortex via subdermal electrodes. They also evaluated whether changes in the minimum stimulus intensity (that is, threshold level) needed to elicit a response from a given muscle predict motor status immediately postoperatively, as well as whether changes in SSEP response amplitude and latency predict sensory status immediately postoperatively. Anesthesia was routinely induced with intravenous propofol and remifentanil, supplemented with inhaled nitrous oxide. Use of neuromuscular block was avoided after intubation. Satisfactory monitoring of muscle response to threshold-level repetitive TES was achieved in all but nine of the 194 patients studied. In contrast, cortical SSEP responses could not be elicited in 42 of 194 individuals. In cases in which responses were present, TES-based evoked responses proved to be extremely accurate for predicting postoperative motor status. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was nearly as accurate for predicting postoperative sensory status. There were frequent instances of postoperative motor or sensory deficit that were not predicted by SSEP- and TES-based monitoring, respectively. There were no adverse events attributable to TES-based monitoring, although since this study ended we have had a single adverse event attributable to threshold-level repetitive TES. Conclusions. Intraoperative threshold-level repetitive TES-based monitoring of central motor conduction has proven to be a simple, safe, and highly accurate technique for the prevention or minimization of inadvertent motor deficit during surgery involving the spine or spinal cord.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume95
Issue number2 SUPPL.
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intraoperative Monitoring
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Muscles
Spinal Cord
Spine
Neuromuscular Blockade
Motor Cortex
Nitrous Oxide
Propofol
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intubation
Reaction Time
Electrodes
Anesthesia
Safety

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • Evoked potential
  • Intraoperative monitoring
  • Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction. / Calancie, Blair; Harris, William; Brindle, G. Fred; Green, Barth A; Landy, Howard.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 95, No. 2 SUPPL., 01.12.2001, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2bc6954d693f4db9b711abf5f1959dad,
title = "Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction",
abstract = "Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess spinal cord motor tract function in individuals undergoing spine surgery, with emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were elicited using standard technique. Muscle electromyographic values were measured in response to a three- or four-pulse train of stimulation delivered to the motor cortex via subdermal electrodes. They also evaluated whether changes in the minimum stimulus intensity (that is, threshold level) needed to elicit a response from a given muscle predict motor status immediately postoperatively, as well as whether changes in SSEP response amplitude and latency predict sensory status immediately postoperatively. Anesthesia was routinely induced with intravenous propofol and remifentanil, supplemented with inhaled nitrous oxide. Use of neuromuscular block was avoided after intubation. Satisfactory monitoring of muscle response to threshold-level repetitive TES was achieved in all but nine of the 194 patients studied. In contrast, cortical SSEP responses could not be elicited in 42 of 194 individuals. In cases in which responses were present, TES-based evoked responses proved to be extremely accurate for predicting postoperative motor status. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was nearly as accurate for predicting postoperative sensory status. There were frequent instances of postoperative motor or sensory deficit that were not predicted by SSEP- and TES-based monitoring, respectively. There were no adverse events attributable to TES-based monitoring, although since this study ended we have had a single adverse event attributable to threshold-level repetitive TES. Conclusions. Intraoperative threshold-level repetitive TES-based monitoring of central motor conduction has proven to be a simple, safe, and highly accurate technique for the prevention or minimization of inadvertent motor deficit during surgery involving the spine or spinal cord.",
keywords = "Electromyography, Evoked potential, Intraoperative monitoring, Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation",
author = "Blair Calancie and William Harris and Brindle, {G. Fred} and Green, {Barth A} and Howard Landy",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "2 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction

AU - Calancie, Blair

AU - Harris, William

AU - Brindle, G. Fred

AU - Green, Barth A

AU - Landy, Howard

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess spinal cord motor tract function in individuals undergoing spine surgery, with emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were elicited using standard technique. Muscle electromyographic values were measured in response to a three- or four-pulse train of stimulation delivered to the motor cortex via subdermal electrodes. They also evaluated whether changes in the minimum stimulus intensity (that is, threshold level) needed to elicit a response from a given muscle predict motor status immediately postoperatively, as well as whether changes in SSEP response amplitude and latency predict sensory status immediately postoperatively. Anesthesia was routinely induced with intravenous propofol and remifentanil, supplemented with inhaled nitrous oxide. Use of neuromuscular block was avoided after intubation. Satisfactory monitoring of muscle response to threshold-level repetitive TES was achieved in all but nine of the 194 patients studied. In contrast, cortical SSEP responses could not be elicited in 42 of 194 individuals. In cases in which responses were present, TES-based evoked responses proved to be extremely accurate for predicting postoperative motor status. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was nearly as accurate for predicting postoperative sensory status. There were frequent instances of postoperative motor or sensory deficit that were not predicted by SSEP- and TES-based monitoring, respectively. There were no adverse events attributable to TES-based monitoring, although since this study ended we have had a single adverse event attributable to threshold-level repetitive TES. Conclusions. Intraoperative threshold-level repetitive TES-based monitoring of central motor conduction has proven to be a simple, safe, and highly accurate technique for the prevention or minimization of inadvertent motor deficit during surgery involving the spine or spinal cord.

AB - Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess spinal cord motor tract function in individuals undergoing spine surgery, with emphasis on safety and efficacy. Methods. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were elicited using standard technique. Muscle electromyographic values were measured in response to a three- or four-pulse train of stimulation delivered to the motor cortex via subdermal electrodes. They also evaluated whether changes in the minimum stimulus intensity (that is, threshold level) needed to elicit a response from a given muscle predict motor status immediately postoperatively, as well as whether changes in SSEP response amplitude and latency predict sensory status immediately postoperatively. Anesthesia was routinely induced with intravenous propofol and remifentanil, supplemented with inhaled nitrous oxide. Use of neuromuscular block was avoided after intubation. Satisfactory monitoring of muscle response to threshold-level repetitive TES was achieved in all but nine of the 194 patients studied. In contrast, cortical SSEP responses could not be elicited in 42 of 194 individuals. In cases in which responses were present, TES-based evoked responses proved to be extremely accurate for predicting postoperative motor status. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was nearly as accurate for predicting postoperative sensory status. There were frequent instances of postoperative motor or sensory deficit that were not predicted by SSEP- and TES-based monitoring, respectively. There were no adverse events attributable to TES-based monitoring, although since this study ended we have had a single adverse event attributable to threshold-level repetitive TES. Conclusions. Intraoperative threshold-level repetitive TES-based monitoring of central motor conduction has proven to be a simple, safe, and highly accurate technique for the prevention or minimization of inadvertent motor deficit during surgery involving the spine or spinal cord.

KW - Electromyography

KW - Evoked potential

KW - Intraoperative monitoring

KW - Repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035490957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035490957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11599831

AN - SCOPUS:0035490957

VL - 95

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 2 SUPPL.

ER -