Toracotomia ou dissecção esofágica trans-hiatal. Qual a melhor abordagem para o esôfago curto?

Translated title of the contribution: Thoracotomy versus transhiatal esophageal dissection. Which is the best surgical approach to short esophagus?

Thiago Beduschi, André Vicente Bigolin, Leandro Totti Cavazzola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate different approaches performed to obtain a more significant esophageal length. Methods: an experimental model using 28 cadavers was conceived. randomized groups: group a (n=10) underwent laparotomic transhiatal approach; group B (n=9) which differed from the first in the conduction of a wide phrenotomy and Group C (n=9) esophageal dissection was performed through a left anterolateral thoracotomy. Results: Final length variations for group a were 2.12cm and 3.29cm and for group B 3.24 cm and 3.66cm, without and with esophageal traction, respectively. in group c length gain observed was 3.81 cm. the mediastinal dissections conducted through the hiatus was considered the procedure that produced the better esophageal mobilization, and the association of wide phrenotomy significantly improved the results. Conclusions: the mediastinal dissection was the most effective to improving gain in abdominal esophagus. When toracotomy and laparotomy were compared, no significant differences were observed in the outcome.

Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)214-219
Number of pages6
JournalActa Cirurgica Brasileira
Volume26
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracotomy
Esophagus
Dissection
Traction
Cadaver
Laparotomy
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Cadaver
  • Dissection
  • Esophagus
  • Laparotomy
  • Mediastinum
  • Operative
  • Surgical procedures
  • Thoracotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Toracotomia ou dissecção esofágica trans-hiatal. Qual a melhor abordagem para o esôfago curto? / Beduschi, Thiago; Bigolin, André Vicente; Cavazzola, Leandro Totti.

In: Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, Vol. 26, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 214-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beduschi, Thiago ; Bigolin, André Vicente ; Cavazzola, Leandro Totti. / Toracotomia ou dissecção esofágica trans-hiatal. Qual a melhor abordagem para o esôfago curto?. In: Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2011 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 214-219.
@article{2ddd7baa515a437583e0e6e2bfdce27b,
title = "Toracotomia ou dissec{\cc}{\~a}o esof{\'a}gica trans-hiatal. Qual a melhor abordagem para o es{\^o}fago curto?",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate different approaches performed to obtain a more significant esophageal length. Methods: an experimental model using 28 cadavers was conceived. randomized groups: group a (n=10) underwent laparotomic transhiatal approach; group B (n=9) which differed from the first in the conduction of a wide phrenotomy and Group C (n=9) esophageal dissection was performed through a left anterolateral thoracotomy. Results: Final length variations for group a were 2.12cm and 3.29cm and for group B 3.24 cm and 3.66cm, without and with esophageal traction, respectively. in group c length gain observed was 3.81 cm. the mediastinal dissections conducted through the hiatus was considered the procedure that produced the better esophageal mobilization, and the association of wide phrenotomy significantly improved the results. Conclusions: the mediastinal dissection was the most effective to improving gain in abdominal esophagus. When toracotomy and laparotomy were compared, no significant differences were observed in the outcome.",
keywords = "Cadaver, Dissection, Esophagus, Laparotomy, Mediastinum, Operative, Surgical procedures, Thoracotomy",
author = "Thiago Beduschi and Bigolin, {Andr{\'e} Vicente} and Cavazzola, {Leandro Totti}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
volume = "26",
pages = "214--219",
journal = "Acta Cirurgica Brasileira",
issn = "0102-8650",
publisher = "Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento de Pesquisa em Cirurgia",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toracotomia ou dissecção esofágica trans-hiatal. Qual a melhor abordagem para o esôfago curto?

AU - Beduschi, Thiago

AU - Bigolin, André Vicente

AU - Cavazzola, Leandro Totti

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate different approaches performed to obtain a more significant esophageal length. Methods: an experimental model using 28 cadavers was conceived. randomized groups: group a (n=10) underwent laparotomic transhiatal approach; group B (n=9) which differed from the first in the conduction of a wide phrenotomy and Group C (n=9) esophageal dissection was performed through a left anterolateral thoracotomy. Results: Final length variations for group a were 2.12cm and 3.29cm and for group B 3.24 cm and 3.66cm, without and with esophageal traction, respectively. in group c length gain observed was 3.81 cm. the mediastinal dissections conducted through the hiatus was considered the procedure that produced the better esophageal mobilization, and the association of wide phrenotomy significantly improved the results. Conclusions: the mediastinal dissection was the most effective to improving gain in abdominal esophagus. When toracotomy and laparotomy were compared, no significant differences were observed in the outcome.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate different approaches performed to obtain a more significant esophageal length. Methods: an experimental model using 28 cadavers was conceived. randomized groups: group a (n=10) underwent laparotomic transhiatal approach; group B (n=9) which differed from the first in the conduction of a wide phrenotomy and Group C (n=9) esophageal dissection was performed through a left anterolateral thoracotomy. Results: Final length variations for group a were 2.12cm and 3.29cm and for group B 3.24 cm and 3.66cm, without and with esophageal traction, respectively. in group c length gain observed was 3.81 cm. the mediastinal dissections conducted through the hiatus was considered the procedure that produced the better esophageal mobilization, and the association of wide phrenotomy significantly improved the results. Conclusions: the mediastinal dissection was the most effective to improving gain in abdominal esophagus. When toracotomy and laparotomy were compared, no significant differences were observed in the outcome.

KW - Cadaver

KW - Dissection

KW - Esophagus

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Mediastinum

KW - Operative

KW - Surgical procedures

KW - Thoracotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955901802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955901802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21537524

AN - SCOPUS:79955901802

VL - 26

SP - 214

EP - 219

JO - Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

JF - Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

SN - 0102-8650

IS - 3

ER -