Theoretical issues

Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems

Lauren Barth-Cohen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

One approach to conceptualizing students' reasoning about complex systems focuses on what I refer to as a series of indicators which function as a gauge for students understanding. Some indicators are associated with centralized causality, a common student difficulty, and some indicators are associated with decentralized causality, a more normative understanding. In this paper, I summarize this approach, and then I discuss a series of embedded theoretical issues such as problematic dichtomous pairing of indicators, ambiguity about kinds of cognitive entities of indicators, context dependency of indicators, and the possibility of certain indicators being bootstrapped for change. I conclude with a discussion of how these results influence the coding of data of students' reasoning about complex systems and the modeling of students' knowledge about complex systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings
Pages291-295
Number of pages5
Volume2
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Sydney, NSW, Australia
Duration: Jul 2 2012Jul 6 2012

Other

Other10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012
CountryAustralia
CitySydney, NSW
Period7/2/127/6/12

Fingerprint

causality
Gages
Large scale systems
Students
student
coding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Barth-Cohen, L. (2012). Theoretical issues: Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems. In 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 291-295)

Theoretical issues : Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems. / Barth-Cohen, Lauren.

10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings. Vol. 2 2012. p. 291-295.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Barth-Cohen, L 2012, Theoretical issues: Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems. in 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings. vol. 2, pp. 291-295, 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 7/2/12.
Barth-Cohen L. Theoretical issues: Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems. In 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings. Vol. 2. 2012. p. 291-295
Barth-Cohen, Lauren. / Theoretical issues : Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems. 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings. Vol. 2 2012. pp. 291-295
@inproceedings{1a205dcdd59a4bd293eaf2a64eac08b5,
title = "Theoretical issues: Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems",
abstract = "One approach to conceptualizing students' reasoning about complex systems focuses on what I refer to as a series of indicators which function as a gauge for students understanding. Some indicators are associated with centralized causality, a common student difficulty, and some indicators are associated with decentralized causality, a more normative understanding. In this paper, I summarize this approach, and then I discuss a series of embedded theoretical issues such as problematic dichtomous pairing of indicators, ambiguity about kinds of cognitive entities of indicators, context dependency of indicators, and the possibility of certain indicators being bootstrapped for change. I conclude with a discussion of how these results influence the coding of data of students' reasoning about complex systems and the modeling of students' knowledge about complex systems.",
author = "Lauren Barth-Cohen",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780578107042",
volume = "2",
pages = "291--295",
booktitle = "10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Theoretical issues

T2 - Indicators of decentralized and centralized causality as a gauge for students' understanding of complex systems

AU - Barth-Cohen, Lauren

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - One approach to conceptualizing students' reasoning about complex systems focuses on what I refer to as a series of indicators which function as a gauge for students understanding. Some indicators are associated with centralized causality, a common student difficulty, and some indicators are associated with decentralized causality, a more normative understanding. In this paper, I summarize this approach, and then I discuss a series of embedded theoretical issues such as problematic dichtomous pairing of indicators, ambiguity about kinds of cognitive entities of indicators, context dependency of indicators, and the possibility of certain indicators being bootstrapped for change. I conclude with a discussion of how these results influence the coding of data of students' reasoning about complex systems and the modeling of students' knowledge about complex systems.

AB - One approach to conceptualizing students' reasoning about complex systems focuses on what I refer to as a series of indicators which function as a gauge for students understanding. Some indicators are associated with centralized causality, a common student difficulty, and some indicators are associated with decentralized causality, a more normative understanding. In this paper, I summarize this approach, and then I discuss a series of embedded theoretical issues such as problematic dichtomous pairing of indicators, ambiguity about kinds of cognitive entities of indicators, context dependency of indicators, and the possibility of certain indicators being bootstrapped for change. I conclude with a discussion of how these results influence the coding of data of students' reasoning about complex systems and the modeling of students' knowledge about complex systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878697106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878697106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780578107042

VL - 2

SP - 291

EP - 295

BT - 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings

ER -