The women of the national supported work demonstration

Sebastian Calonico, Jeffrey Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper re-creates three of the samples from LaLonde’s famous 1986 paper that began the literature on “within-study designs” that uses experiments as benchmarks against which to assess the performance of nonexperimental identification strategies. In particular, we recreate the experimental data for the target group of women on welfare from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration and two of the corresponding comparison groups drawn from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The loss of these data resulted in the (sizable) subsequent literature devoting its attention solely to the NSW men. In addition to repeating LaLonde’s analyses on our recreations of his files for the AFDC women, we apply (many of) the estimators from later papers by Dehejia and Wahba and by Smith and Todd to these data. Our findings support the general view in the literature that women on welfare pose a less difficult selection problem when evaluating employment and training programs. They also call into question the generalizability of some of the broad conclusions that Dehejia and Wahba and Smith and Todd draw from their analyses of the NSW men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S65-S97
JournalJournal of Labor Economics
Volume35
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Panel study
Income
Experiment
Generalizability
Recreation
Benchmark
Estimator
Training program

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

The women of the national supported work demonstration. / Calonico, Sebastian; Smith, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 35, No. S1, 01.01.2017, p. S65-S97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d580618c85564d91b7873abf9881c15a,
title = "The women of the national supported work demonstration",
abstract = "This paper re-creates three of the samples from LaLonde’s famous 1986 paper that began the literature on “within-study designs” that uses experiments as benchmarks against which to assess the performance of nonexperimental identification strategies. In particular, we recreate the experimental data for the target group of women on welfare from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration and two of the corresponding comparison groups drawn from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The loss of these data resulted in the (sizable) subsequent literature devoting its attention solely to the NSW men. In addition to repeating LaLonde’s analyses on our recreations of his files for the AFDC women, we apply (many of) the estimators from later papers by Dehejia and Wahba and by Smith and Todd to these data. Our findings support the general view in the literature that women on welfare pose a less difficult selection problem when evaluating employment and training programs. They also call into question the generalizability of some of the broad conclusions that Dehejia and Wahba and Smith and Todd draw from their analyses of the NSW men.",
author = "Sebastian Calonico and Jeffrey Smith",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/692397",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "S65--S97",
journal = "Journal of Labor Economics",
issn = "0734-306X",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The women of the national supported work demonstration

AU - Calonico, Sebastian

AU - Smith, Jeffrey

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This paper re-creates three of the samples from LaLonde’s famous 1986 paper that began the literature on “within-study designs” that uses experiments as benchmarks against which to assess the performance of nonexperimental identification strategies. In particular, we recreate the experimental data for the target group of women on welfare from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration and two of the corresponding comparison groups drawn from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The loss of these data resulted in the (sizable) subsequent literature devoting its attention solely to the NSW men. In addition to repeating LaLonde’s analyses on our recreations of his files for the AFDC women, we apply (many of) the estimators from later papers by Dehejia and Wahba and by Smith and Todd to these data. Our findings support the general view in the literature that women on welfare pose a less difficult selection problem when evaluating employment and training programs. They also call into question the generalizability of some of the broad conclusions that Dehejia and Wahba and Smith and Todd draw from their analyses of the NSW men.

AB - This paper re-creates three of the samples from LaLonde’s famous 1986 paper that began the literature on “within-study designs” that uses experiments as benchmarks against which to assess the performance of nonexperimental identification strategies. In particular, we recreate the experimental data for the target group of women on welfare from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration and two of the corresponding comparison groups drawn from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The loss of these data resulted in the (sizable) subsequent literature devoting its attention solely to the NSW men. In addition to repeating LaLonde’s analyses on our recreations of his files for the AFDC women, we apply (many of) the estimators from later papers by Dehejia and Wahba and by Smith and Todd to these data. Our findings support the general view in the literature that women on welfare pose a less difficult selection problem when evaluating employment and training programs. They also call into question the generalizability of some of the broad conclusions that Dehejia and Wahba and Smith and Todd draw from their analyses of the NSW men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021751577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021751577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/692397

DO - 10.1086/692397

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021751577

VL - 35

SP - S65-S97

JO - Journal of Labor Economics

JF - Journal of Labor Economics

SN - 0734-306X

IS - S1

ER -