The What, Why, Who, and How of Globalization: What is Psychology to Do?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Globalization is an amorphous construct that requires demarcation. To do that, I attempt to answer the what, who, why and how of globalization. The first question consists of three elements: people, products, and processes. The second question contains two parts: by whom and for whom. The third answer consists of an agentic response and a socio-historical one. Finally, the last question contains several answers, ranging from the psychological to the political. The second part of the paper deals with the implications of globalization for psychology. I call on psychology to embrace (a) an ecological and multidimensional view of well-being, (b) an ecological and multidimensional view of justice, and (c) a systematic approach to personal, organizational, and societal change. These changes will be more likely if psychology renounced its support for the societal status quo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-629
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

psychology
globalization
well-being
justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The What, Why, Who, and How of Globalization : What is Psychology to Do? / Prilleltensky, Isaac.

In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.09.2012, p. 612-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42d998d5a31a4661a43a35c738d193c2,
title = "The What, Why, Who, and How of Globalization: What is Psychology to Do?",
abstract = "Globalization is an amorphous construct that requires demarcation. To do that, I attempt to answer the what, who, why and how of globalization. The first question consists of three elements: people, products, and processes. The second question contains two parts: by whom and for whom. The third answer consists of an agentic response and a socio-historical one. Finally, the last question contains several answers, ranging from the psychological to the political. The second part of the paper deals with the implications of globalization for psychology. I call on psychology to embrace (a) an ecological and multidimensional view of well-being, (b) an ecological and multidimensional view of justice, and (c) a systematic approach to personal, organizational, and societal change. These changes will be more likely if psychology renounced its support for the societal status quo.",
author = "Isaac Prilleltensky",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01766.x",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "612--629",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The What, Why, Who, and How of Globalization

T2 - What is Psychology to Do?

AU - Prilleltensky, Isaac

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Globalization is an amorphous construct that requires demarcation. To do that, I attempt to answer the what, who, why and how of globalization. The first question consists of three elements: people, products, and processes. The second question contains two parts: by whom and for whom. The third answer consists of an agentic response and a socio-historical one. Finally, the last question contains several answers, ranging from the psychological to the political. The second part of the paper deals with the implications of globalization for psychology. I call on psychology to embrace (a) an ecological and multidimensional view of well-being, (b) an ecological and multidimensional view of justice, and (c) a systematic approach to personal, organizational, and societal change. These changes will be more likely if psychology renounced its support for the societal status quo.

AB - Globalization is an amorphous construct that requires demarcation. To do that, I attempt to answer the what, who, why and how of globalization. The first question consists of three elements: people, products, and processes. The second question contains two parts: by whom and for whom. The third answer consists of an agentic response and a socio-historical one. Finally, the last question contains several answers, ranging from the psychological to the political. The second part of the paper deals with the implications of globalization for psychology. I call on psychology to embrace (a) an ecological and multidimensional view of well-being, (b) an ecological and multidimensional view of justice, and (c) a systematic approach to personal, organizational, and societal change. These changes will be more likely if psychology renounced its support for the societal status quo.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866040258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866040258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01766.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01766.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866040258

VL - 68

SP - 612

EP - 629

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

IS - 3

ER -