The universal orbital implant: indications and methods.

R. L. Anderson, S. M. Thiese, J. A. Nerad, D. R. Jordan, David Tse, L. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Major criticisms of quasi-integrated implants, such as the Iowa Implant, have been the time-consuming surgical technique needed to implant the prosthesis, and the high rate of extrusion. The Universal Implant (Oculo-Plastik, Montreal) is designed with these concerns in mind. In addition, those qualities that produce the motility advantages of a quasi-integrated implant and the ease of placement of a sphere have been incorporated into the design of the Universal Implant. The Universal Implant also (1) uses a faster implantation technique at surgery, (2) avoids cleaning the muscles, (3) has smaller mounds that are lower and more rounded, and should decrease the late extrusion rate, (4) can be used as an evisceration implant, enucleation implant, or secondary implant, and (5) has a larger girth and radius on the posterior surface that, in turn, helps support orbital fat and tissues and results in a more natural superior sulcus. It is recommended that the Universal Implant be used by surgeons who were pleased with the Iowa Implant, as the Universal implant represents an excellent alternative with major advantages over most other enucleation implants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-99
Number of pages12
JournalAdvances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume8
StatePublished - Dec 1 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Orbital Implants
Prostheses and Implants
Fats
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anderson, R. L., Thiese, S. M., Nerad, J. A., Jordan, D. R., Tse, D., & Allen, L. (1990). The universal orbital implant: indications and methods. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery, 8, 88-99.

The universal orbital implant : indications and methods. / Anderson, R. L.; Thiese, S. M.; Nerad, J. A.; Jordan, D. R.; Tse, David; Allen, L.

In: Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 8, 01.12.1990, p. 88-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, RL, Thiese, SM, Nerad, JA, Jordan, DR, Tse, D & Allen, L 1990, 'The universal orbital implant: indications and methods.', Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 8, pp. 88-99.
Anderson, R. L. ; Thiese, S. M. ; Nerad, J. A. ; Jordan, D. R. ; Tse, David ; Allen, L. / The universal orbital implant : indications and methods. In: Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1990 ; Vol. 8. pp. 88-99.
@article{05f070a12abd4b5bba5810d1a5b63f7f,
title = "The universal orbital implant: indications and methods.",
abstract = "Major criticisms of quasi-integrated implants, such as the Iowa Implant, have been the time-consuming surgical technique needed to implant the prosthesis, and the high rate of extrusion. The Universal Implant (Oculo-Plastik, Montreal) is designed with these concerns in mind. In addition, those qualities that produce the motility advantages of a quasi-integrated implant and the ease of placement of a sphere have been incorporated into the design of the Universal Implant. The Universal Implant also (1) uses a faster implantation technique at surgery, (2) avoids cleaning the muscles, (3) has smaller mounds that are lower and more rounded, and should decrease the late extrusion rate, (4) can be used as an evisceration implant, enucleation implant, or secondary implant, and (5) has a larger girth and radius on the posterior surface that, in turn, helps support orbital fat and tissues and results in a more natural superior sulcus. It is recommended that the Universal Implant be used by surgeons who were pleased with the Iowa Implant, as the Universal implant represents an excellent alternative with major advantages over most other enucleation implants.",
author = "Anderson, {R. L.} and Thiese, {S. M.} and Nerad, {J. A.} and Jordan, {D. R.} and David Tse and L. Allen",
year = "1990",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "88--99",
journal = "Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery",
issn = "0276-3508",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The universal orbital implant

T2 - indications and methods.

AU - Anderson, R. L.

AU - Thiese, S. M.

AU - Nerad, J. A.

AU - Jordan, D. R.

AU - Tse, David

AU - Allen, L.

PY - 1990/12/1

Y1 - 1990/12/1

N2 - Major criticisms of quasi-integrated implants, such as the Iowa Implant, have been the time-consuming surgical technique needed to implant the prosthesis, and the high rate of extrusion. The Universal Implant (Oculo-Plastik, Montreal) is designed with these concerns in mind. In addition, those qualities that produce the motility advantages of a quasi-integrated implant and the ease of placement of a sphere have been incorporated into the design of the Universal Implant. The Universal Implant also (1) uses a faster implantation technique at surgery, (2) avoids cleaning the muscles, (3) has smaller mounds that are lower and more rounded, and should decrease the late extrusion rate, (4) can be used as an evisceration implant, enucleation implant, or secondary implant, and (5) has a larger girth and radius on the posterior surface that, in turn, helps support orbital fat and tissues and results in a more natural superior sulcus. It is recommended that the Universal Implant be used by surgeons who were pleased with the Iowa Implant, as the Universal implant represents an excellent alternative with major advantages over most other enucleation implants.

AB - Major criticisms of quasi-integrated implants, such as the Iowa Implant, have been the time-consuming surgical technique needed to implant the prosthesis, and the high rate of extrusion. The Universal Implant (Oculo-Plastik, Montreal) is designed with these concerns in mind. In addition, those qualities that produce the motility advantages of a quasi-integrated implant and the ease of placement of a sphere have been incorporated into the design of the Universal Implant. The Universal Implant also (1) uses a faster implantation technique at surgery, (2) avoids cleaning the muscles, (3) has smaller mounds that are lower and more rounded, and should decrease the late extrusion rate, (4) can be used as an evisceration implant, enucleation implant, or secondary implant, and (5) has a larger girth and radius on the posterior surface that, in turn, helps support orbital fat and tissues and results in a more natural superior sulcus. It is recommended that the Universal Implant be used by surgeons who were pleased with the Iowa Implant, as the Universal implant represents an excellent alternative with major advantages over most other enucleation implants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025619271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025619271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2248728

AN - SCOPUS:0025619271

VL - 8

SP - 88

EP - 99

JO - Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery

JF - Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery

SN - 0276-3508

ER -