The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals

W. James Potter, Roger Cooper, Michel Dupagne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars who write about the paradigms influencing mass media research differ in their speculations. This study was conducted to provide an empirical analysis by examining six characteristics of mass media research articles published in eight major communication journals. The social science paradigm was found to account for over 60% of the studies, while the interpretive paradigm accounted for about 34% and the critical paradigm less than 6%. It was concluded that the social science paradigm, while being the majority paradigm in the mainstream journals, could not be considered a dominant paradigm in the research field. Also, even though most of the research emulated the social science paradigm in purpose, it failed to meet scientific standards of theoretical orientation leading to quantitative data gathered by probabilistic sampling methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-335
Number of pages19
JournalCommunication Theory
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

communication research
mass media
Social sciences
paradigm
communication
Communication
social science
Sampling
Paradigm
Mass Media
speculation
field research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals. / Potter, W. James; Cooper, Roger; Dupagne, Michel.

In: Communication Theory, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.01.1993, p. 317-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Potter, W. James ; Cooper, Roger ; Dupagne, Michel. / The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals. In: Communication Theory. 1993 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 317-335.
@article{7c497b96197041cfa313dfb64cf5506d,
title = "The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals",
abstract = "Scholars who write about the paradigms influencing mass media research differ in their speculations. This study was conducted to provide an empirical analysis by examining six characteristics of mass media research articles published in eight major communication journals. The social science paradigm was found to account for over 60{\%} of the studies, while the interpretive paradigm accounted for about 34{\%} and the critical paradigm less than 6{\%}. It was concluded that the social science paradigm, while being the majority paradigm in the mainstream journals, could not be considered a dominant paradigm in the research field. Also, even though most of the research emulated the social science paradigm in purpose, it failed to meet scientific standards of theoretical orientation leading to quantitative data gathered by probabilistic sampling methods.",
author = "Potter, {W. James} and Roger Cooper and Michel Dupagne",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00077.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "317--335",
journal = "Communication Theory",
issn = "1050-3293",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Three Paradigms of Mass Media Research In Mainstream Communication Journals

AU - Potter, W. James

AU - Cooper, Roger

AU - Dupagne, Michel

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Scholars who write about the paradigms influencing mass media research differ in their speculations. This study was conducted to provide an empirical analysis by examining six characteristics of mass media research articles published in eight major communication journals. The social science paradigm was found to account for over 60% of the studies, while the interpretive paradigm accounted for about 34% and the critical paradigm less than 6%. It was concluded that the social science paradigm, while being the majority paradigm in the mainstream journals, could not be considered a dominant paradigm in the research field. Also, even though most of the research emulated the social science paradigm in purpose, it failed to meet scientific standards of theoretical orientation leading to quantitative data gathered by probabilistic sampling methods.

AB - Scholars who write about the paradigms influencing mass media research differ in their speculations. This study was conducted to provide an empirical analysis by examining six characteristics of mass media research articles published in eight major communication journals. The social science paradigm was found to account for over 60% of the studies, while the interpretive paradigm accounted for about 34% and the critical paradigm less than 6%. It was concluded that the social science paradigm, while being the majority paradigm in the mainstream journals, could not be considered a dominant paradigm in the research field. Also, even though most of the research emulated the social science paradigm in purpose, it failed to meet scientific standards of theoretical orientation leading to quantitative data gathered by probabilistic sampling methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250071847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250071847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00077.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00077.x

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 317

EP - 335

JO - Communication Theory

JF - Communication Theory

SN - 1050-3293

IS - 4

ER -