The special education referral and decision-making process for English language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences

Janette K. Klingner, Elizabeth Harry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the special education referral and decisionmaking process for English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on Child Study Team (CST) meetings and placement conferences/multidisciplinary team, meetings. We wished to learn how school personnel determined if ELLs who were struggling had disabilities, to what extent those involved in the process understood second language acquisition, and whether language issues were considered when determining special education eligibility. We observed CST meetings and placement conferences for 19 students who were considered ELLs when they were referred. Findings revealed that in practice, only cursory attention was given to prereferral strategies. Most students were pushed toward testing, based on an assumption that poor academic performance or behavioral difficulties had their origin within the child and indicated a need for special education. Although some school personnel were quite knowledgeable about language issues, many were not. There was tremendous variation in the quality of what transpired during meetings. These differences were influenced by the intentions, knowledge, skills, and commitment of CST or multidisciplinary team members. All the factors we describe point to aspects of the process that should be improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2247-2281
Number of pages35
JournalTeachers College Record
Volume108
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

special education
decision-making process
English language
personnel
language
language acquisition
school
student
disability
commitment
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{c26e4910e0c44538b4bed0ebb684ac3c,
title = "The special education referral and decision-making process for English language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the special education referral and decisionmaking process for English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on Child Study Team (CST) meetings and placement conferences/multidisciplinary team, meetings. We wished to learn how school personnel determined if ELLs who were struggling had disabilities, to what extent those involved in the process understood second language acquisition, and whether language issues were considered when determining special education eligibility. We observed CST meetings and placement conferences for 19 students who were considered ELLs when they were referred. Findings revealed that in practice, only cursory attention was given to prereferral strategies. Most students were pushed toward testing, based on an assumption that poor academic performance or behavioral difficulties had their origin within the child and indicated a need for special education. Although some school personnel were quite knowledgeable about language issues, many were not. There was tremendous variation in the quality of what transpired during meetings. These differences were influenced by the intentions, knowledge, skills, and commitment of CST or multidisciplinary team members. All the factors we describe point to aspects of the process that should be improved.",
author = "Klingner, {Janette K.} and Elizabeth Harry",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00781.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "2247--2281",
journal = "Teachers College Record",
issn = "0161-4681",
publisher = "Teachers College Record",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The special education referral and decision-making process for English language learners

T2 - Child study team meetings and placement conferences

AU - Klingner, Janette K.

AU - Harry, Elizabeth

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the special education referral and decisionmaking process for English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on Child Study Team (CST) meetings and placement conferences/multidisciplinary team, meetings. We wished to learn how school personnel determined if ELLs who were struggling had disabilities, to what extent those involved in the process understood second language acquisition, and whether language issues were considered when determining special education eligibility. We observed CST meetings and placement conferences for 19 students who were considered ELLs when they were referred. Findings revealed that in practice, only cursory attention was given to prereferral strategies. Most students were pushed toward testing, based on an assumption that poor academic performance or behavioral difficulties had their origin within the child and indicated a need for special education. Although some school personnel were quite knowledgeable about language issues, many were not. There was tremendous variation in the quality of what transpired during meetings. These differences were influenced by the intentions, knowledge, skills, and commitment of CST or multidisciplinary team members. All the factors we describe point to aspects of the process that should be improved.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the special education referral and decisionmaking process for English language learners (ELLs), with a focus on Child Study Team (CST) meetings and placement conferences/multidisciplinary team, meetings. We wished to learn how school personnel determined if ELLs who were struggling had disabilities, to what extent those involved in the process understood second language acquisition, and whether language issues were considered when determining special education eligibility. We observed CST meetings and placement conferences for 19 students who were considered ELLs when they were referred. Findings revealed that in practice, only cursory attention was given to prereferral strategies. Most students were pushed toward testing, based on an assumption that poor academic performance or behavioral difficulties had their origin within the child and indicated a need for special education. Although some school personnel were quite knowledgeable about language issues, many were not. There was tremendous variation in the quality of what transpired during meetings. These differences were influenced by the intentions, knowledge, skills, and commitment of CST or multidisciplinary team members. All the factors we describe point to aspects of the process that should be improved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750199803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750199803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00781.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00781.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750199803

VL - 108

SP - 2247

EP - 2281

JO - Teachers College Record

JF - Teachers College Record

SN - 0161-4681

IS - 11

ER -