The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The semantic view of theories is one according to which theories are construed as models of their linguistic formulations. The implications of this view for scientific realism have been little discussed. Contrary to the suggestion of various champions of the semantic view, it is argued that this approach does not make support for a plausible scientific realism any less problematic than it might otherwise be. Though a degree of independence of theory from language may ensure safety from pitfalls associated with logical empiricism, realism cannot be entertained unless models or (abstracted and/or idealized) aspects thereof are spelled out in terms of linguistic formulations (such as mathematical equations), which can be interpreted in terms of correspondence with the world. The putative advantage of the semantic approach - its linguistic independence - is thus of no help to the realist. I consider recent treatments of the model-theoretic view (Suppe, Giere, Smith), and find that although some of these accounts harbour the promise of realism, this promise is deceptive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-345
Number of pages21
JournalSynthese
Volume127
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

realism
semantics
linguistics
empiricism
Scientific Realism
language
Realism
Language
Champions
Equations
Harbors
Pitfalls
Realist
Safety
Logical Empiricism
Semantic View of Theories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism. / Chakravartty, Anjan.

In: Synthese, Vol. 127, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 325-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{9e77be8352d24ccf870821ad278f2082,
title = "The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism",
abstract = "The semantic view of theories is one according to which theories are construed as models of their linguistic formulations. The implications of this view for scientific realism have been little discussed. Contrary to the suggestion of various champions of the semantic view, it is argued that this approach does not make support for a plausible scientific realism any less problematic than it might otherwise be. Though a degree of independence of theory from language may ensure safety from pitfalls associated with logical empiricism, realism cannot be entertained unless models or (abstracted and/or idealized) aspects thereof are spelled out in terms of linguistic formulations (such as mathematical equations), which can be interpreted in terms of correspondence with the world. The putative advantage of the semantic approach - its linguistic independence - is thus of no help to the realist. I consider recent treatments of the model-theoretic view (Suppe, Giere, Smith), and find that although some of these accounts harbour the promise of realism, this promise is deceptive.",
author = "Anjan Chakravartty",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1010359521312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "325--345",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism

AU - Chakravartty, Anjan

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The semantic view of theories is one according to which theories are construed as models of their linguistic formulations. The implications of this view for scientific realism have been little discussed. Contrary to the suggestion of various champions of the semantic view, it is argued that this approach does not make support for a plausible scientific realism any less problematic than it might otherwise be. Though a degree of independence of theory from language may ensure safety from pitfalls associated with logical empiricism, realism cannot be entertained unless models or (abstracted and/or idealized) aspects thereof are spelled out in terms of linguistic formulations (such as mathematical equations), which can be interpreted in terms of correspondence with the world. The putative advantage of the semantic approach - its linguistic independence - is thus of no help to the realist. I consider recent treatments of the model-theoretic view (Suppe, Giere, Smith), and find that although some of these accounts harbour the promise of realism, this promise is deceptive.

AB - The semantic view of theories is one according to which theories are construed as models of their linguistic formulations. The implications of this view for scientific realism have been little discussed. Contrary to the suggestion of various champions of the semantic view, it is argued that this approach does not make support for a plausible scientific realism any less problematic than it might otherwise be. Though a degree of independence of theory from language may ensure safety from pitfalls associated with logical empiricism, realism cannot be entertained unless models or (abstracted and/or idealized) aspects thereof are spelled out in terms of linguistic formulations (such as mathematical equations), which can be interpreted in terms of correspondence with the world. The putative advantage of the semantic approach - its linguistic independence - is thus of no help to the realist. I consider recent treatments of the model-theoretic view (Suppe, Giere, Smith), and find that although some of these accounts harbour the promise of realism, this promise is deceptive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28844457863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28844457863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1010359521312

DO - 10.1023/A:1010359521312

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:28844457863

VL - 127

SP - 325

EP - 345

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 3

ER -