Abstract
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Future of the Academic Journal |
| Editors | Bill Cope, Angus Phillips |
| Place of Publication | Oxford, UK |
| Publisher | Chandos Press |
| Pages | 299-315 |
| Edition | 2nd |
| State | Published - 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Open access
- institutional repository
- disciplinary repository
- research data management
- library publishing
- funder mandates
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Library and Information Sciences
Cite this
The role of repositories in the future of the journal. / Shreeves, Sarah.
The Future of the Academic Journal. ed. / Bill Cope; Angus Phillips. 2nd. ed. Oxford, UK : Chandos Press, 2014. p. 299-315.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - The role of repositories in the future of the journal
AU - Shreeves, Sarah
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The UK Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by Dame Janet Finch, report, “Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications,” helped to crystallize a long simmering debate within the open access (OA) community: should the focus for OA advocates be “green” open access – that is, the use of repositories to make research published through traditional subscription-based venues openly available – or should it be ‘gold’ open access – that is, through publication within venues that are themselves open access? This chapter argues that that this has never truly been an either/or proposition, and that this debate often ignores or minimizes the wide variety of roles – direct and indirect – that repositories play within the larger scholarly publishing ecosystem. Research data, funder and institutional mandates for open access to published research via repositories, and the growing role of library as publisher, are all evidence that the repository – whether institutional or disciplinary or format driven – will continue to play a role within the larger scholarly publishing environment.
AB - The UK Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by Dame Janet Finch, report, “Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications,” helped to crystallize a long simmering debate within the open access (OA) community: should the focus for OA advocates be “green” open access – that is, the use of repositories to make research published through traditional subscription-based venues openly available – or should it be ‘gold’ open access – that is, through publication within venues that are themselves open access? This chapter argues that that this has never truly been an either/or proposition, and that this debate often ignores or minimizes the wide variety of roles – direct and indirect – that repositories play within the larger scholarly publishing ecosystem. Research data, funder and institutional mandates for open access to published research via repositories, and the growing role of library as publisher, are all evidence that the repository – whether institutional or disciplinary or format driven – will continue to play a role within the larger scholarly publishing environment.
KW - Open access
KW - institutional repository
KW - disciplinary repository
KW - research data management
KW - library publishing
KW - funder mandates
M3 - Chapter
SP - 299
EP - 315
BT - The Future of the Academic Journal
A2 - Cope, Bill
A2 - Phillips, Angus
PB - Chandos Press
CY - Oxford, UK
ER -