The Role of Neuroscience Within Psychology: A Call for Inclusiveness Over Exclusiveness

Seth J Schwartz, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Alan Meca, Katheryn C. Sauvigne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present article, we appraise the increasingly prominent role of neuroscience within psychology and offer cautions and recommendations regarding the future of psychology as a field. We contend that the conflict between eliminative reductionism (the belief that the neural level of analysis will eventually render the psychological level of analysis superfluous) and emergent properties (the assumption that higher-order mental functions are not directly reducible to neural processes) is critical if we are to identify the optimal role for neuroscience within psychology. We argue for an interdisciplinary future for psychology in which the considerable strengths of neuroscience complement and extend the strengths of other subfields of psychology. For this goal to be achieved, a balance must be struck between an increasing focus on neuroscience and the continued importance of other areas of psychology. We discuss the implications of the growing prominence of neuroscience for the broader profession of psychology, especially with respect to funding agency priorities, hiring practices in psychology departments, methodological rigor, and the training of future generations of students. We conclude with recommendations for advancing psychology as both a social science and a natural science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-70
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
Psychology
Inclusiveness
Neuroscience
Natural Science Disciplines
Social Sciences
Social Responsibility
Students

Keywords

  • Emergent properties
  • Funding agency priorities
  • Hiring practices
  • Neuroscience
  • Training of students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The Role of Neuroscience Within Psychology : A Call for Inclusiveness Over Exclusiveness. / Schwartz, Seth J; Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Meca, Alan; Sauvigne, Katheryn C.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 71, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 52-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwartz, Seth J ; Lilienfeld, Scott O. ; Meca, Alan ; Sauvigne, Katheryn C. / The Role of Neuroscience Within Psychology : A Call for Inclusiveness Over Exclusiveness. In: American Psychologist. 2016 ; Vol. 71, No. 1. pp. 52-70.
@article{ce8f595f47db4c06bb6c532f0fc6aba8,
title = "The Role of Neuroscience Within Psychology: A Call for Inclusiveness Over Exclusiveness",
abstract = "In the present article, we appraise the increasingly prominent role of neuroscience within psychology and offer cautions and recommendations regarding the future of psychology as a field. We contend that the conflict between eliminative reductionism (the belief that the neural level of analysis will eventually render the psychological level of analysis superfluous) and emergent properties (the assumption that higher-order mental functions are not directly reducible to neural processes) is critical if we are to identify the optimal role for neuroscience within psychology. We argue for an interdisciplinary future for psychology in which the considerable strengths of neuroscience complement and extend the strengths of other subfields of psychology. For this goal to be achieved, a balance must be struck between an increasing focus on neuroscience and the continued importance of other areas of psychology. We discuss the implications of the growing prominence of neuroscience for the broader profession of psychology, especially with respect to funding agency priorities, hiring practices in psychology departments, methodological rigor, and the training of future generations of students. We conclude with recommendations for advancing psychology as both a social science and a natural science.",
keywords = "Emergent properties, Funding agency priorities, Hiring practices, Neuroscience, Training of students",
author = "Schwartz, {Seth J} and Lilienfeld, {Scott O.} and Alan Meca and Sauvigne, {Katheryn C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0039678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "52--70",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Neuroscience Within Psychology

T2 - A Call for Inclusiveness Over Exclusiveness

AU - Schwartz, Seth J

AU - Lilienfeld, Scott O.

AU - Meca, Alan

AU - Sauvigne, Katheryn C.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In the present article, we appraise the increasingly prominent role of neuroscience within psychology and offer cautions and recommendations regarding the future of psychology as a field. We contend that the conflict between eliminative reductionism (the belief that the neural level of analysis will eventually render the psychological level of analysis superfluous) and emergent properties (the assumption that higher-order mental functions are not directly reducible to neural processes) is critical if we are to identify the optimal role for neuroscience within psychology. We argue for an interdisciplinary future for psychology in which the considerable strengths of neuroscience complement and extend the strengths of other subfields of psychology. For this goal to be achieved, a balance must be struck between an increasing focus on neuroscience and the continued importance of other areas of psychology. We discuss the implications of the growing prominence of neuroscience for the broader profession of psychology, especially with respect to funding agency priorities, hiring practices in psychology departments, methodological rigor, and the training of future generations of students. We conclude with recommendations for advancing psychology as both a social science and a natural science.

AB - In the present article, we appraise the increasingly prominent role of neuroscience within psychology and offer cautions and recommendations regarding the future of psychology as a field. We contend that the conflict between eliminative reductionism (the belief that the neural level of analysis will eventually render the psychological level of analysis superfluous) and emergent properties (the assumption that higher-order mental functions are not directly reducible to neural processes) is critical if we are to identify the optimal role for neuroscience within psychology. We argue for an interdisciplinary future for psychology in which the considerable strengths of neuroscience complement and extend the strengths of other subfields of psychology. For this goal to be achieved, a balance must be struck between an increasing focus on neuroscience and the continued importance of other areas of psychology. We discuss the implications of the growing prominence of neuroscience for the broader profession of psychology, especially with respect to funding agency priorities, hiring practices in psychology departments, methodological rigor, and the training of future generations of students. We conclude with recommendations for advancing psychology as both a social science and a natural science.

KW - Emergent properties

KW - Funding agency priorities

KW - Hiring practices

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Training of students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954285573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954285573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0039678

DO - 10.1037/a0039678

M3 - Article

C2 - 26766765

AN - SCOPUS:84954285573

VL - 71

SP - 52

EP - 70

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 1

ER -