The role of issue valence and issue capability in determining effort investment

Vikas Mittal, William T. Ross, Michael Tsiros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How decision makers invest their effort among various issues is critical to organizational success (Ocasio 1997). The authors investigate the effects of issue valence and issue capability on how decision makers allocate effort to an issue. They develop hypotheses regarding these constructs and test them in three studies. Results show that in the condition of high capability, decision makers are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is negatively, rather than positively, framed. Conversely, with low capability, they are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is positively, rather than negatively, framed. Results also clarify the variable focus on upside potential and risk taking as two mechanisms that underlie this preference reversal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-468
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision maker
Valence
Preference reversal
Risk taking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

The role of issue valence and issue capability in determining effort investment. / Mittal, Vikas; Ross, William T.; Tsiros, Michael.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, No. 4, 11.2002, p. 455-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92d7474ee61e462bb13f62894ae18bd6,
title = "The role of issue valence and issue capability in determining effort investment",
abstract = "How decision makers invest their effort among various issues is critical to organizational success (Ocasio 1997). The authors investigate the effects of issue valence and issue capability on how decision makers allocate effort to an issue. They develop hypotheses regarding these constructs and test them in three studies. Results show that in the condition of high capability, decision makers are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is negatively, rather than positively, framed. Conversely, with low capability, they are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is positively, rather than negatively, framed. Results also clarify the variable focus on upside potential and risk taking as two mechanisms that underlie this preference reversal.",
author = "Vikas Mittal and Ross, {William T.} and Michael Tsiros",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1509/jmkr.39.4.455.19122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "455--468",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of issue valence and issue capability in determining effort investment

AU - Mittal, Vikas

AU - Ross, William T.

AU - Tsiros, Michael

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - How decision makers invest their effort among various issues is critical to organizational success (Ocasio 1997). The authors investigate the effects of issue valence and issue capability on how decision makers allocate effort to an issue. They develop hypotheses regarding these constructs and test them in three studies. Results show that in the condition of high capability, decision makers are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is negatively, rather than positively, framed. Conversely, with low capability, they are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is positively, rather than negatively, framed. Results also clarify the variable focus on upside potential and risk taking as two mechanisms that underlie this preference reversal.

AB - How decision makers invest their effort among various issues is critical to organizational success (Ocasio 1997). The authors investigate the effects of issue valence and issue capability on how decision makers allocate effort to an issue. They develop hypotheses regarding these constructs and test them in three studies. Results show that in the condition of high capability, decision makers are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is negatively, rather than positively, framed. Conversely, with low capability, they are more likely to invest effort in an issue that is positively, rather than negatively, framed. Results also clarify the variable focus on upside potential and risk taking as two mechanisms that underlie this preference reversal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036851378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036851378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1509/jmkr.39.4.455.19122

DO - 10.1509/jmkr.39.4.455.19122

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036851378

VL - 39

SP - 455

EP - 468

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 4

ER -