The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization

Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design

Christopher B. Mann, Casey A Klofstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We demonstrate the centrality of high quality personal interactions for successfully overcoming the collective action problem of voter mobilization, and highlight the need for attention to treatment quality before making substantive inferences from field experiments. We exploit natural variation in the quality of voter mobilization phone calls across call centers to examine how call quality affects voter mobilization in a large-scale field experiment conducted during the 2010 Election. High quality calls (from call centers specializing in calling related to politics) produced significant increases in turnout. In contrast, low quality calls (from multi-purpose commercial call centers) failed to increase turnout. Furthermore, we offer caution about using higher contact rates as an indication of delivery quality. Our treatment conditions with higher contact rates had no impact on turnout, suggesting an unfavorable trade-off between quantity of contacts and call quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPolitical Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2013

Fingerprint

mobilization
voter
call center
contact
experiment
collective behavior
indication
election
politics
interaction

Keywords

  • Causal inference
  • Experimental design
  • Field experiment
  • House effects
  • Mobilization calls
  • Voter mobilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{6548a25dd5a943d6b29e41f98209b021,
title = "The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization: Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design",
abstract = "We demonstrate the centrality of high quality personal interactions for successfully overcoming the collective action problem of voter mobilization, and highlight the need for attention to treatment quality before making substantive inferences from field experiments. We exploit natural variation in the quality of voter mobilization phone calls across call centers to examine how call quality affects voter mobilization in a large-scale field experiment conducted during the 2010 Election. High quality calls (from call centers specializing in calling related to politics) produced significant increases in turnout. In contrast, low quality calls (from multi-purpose commercial call centers) failed to increase turnout. Furthermore, we offer caution about using higher contact rates as an indication of delivery quality. Our treatment conditions with higher contact rates had no impact on turnout, suggesting an unfavorable trade-off between quantity of contacts and call quality.",
keywords = "Causal inference, Experimental design, Field experiment, House effects, Mobilization calls, Voter mobilization",
author = "Mann, {Christopher B.} and Klofstad, {Casey A}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-013-9264-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization

T2 - Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design

AU - Mann, Christopher B.

AU - Klofstad, Casey A

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We demonstrate the centrality of high quality personal interactions for successfully overcoming the collective action problem of voter mobilization, and highlight the need for attention to treatment quality before making substantive inferences from field experiments. We exploit natural variation in the quality of voter mobilization phone calls across call centers to examine how call quality affects voter mobilization in a large-scale field experiment conducted during the 2010 Election. High quality calls (from call centers specializing in calling related to politics) produced significant increases in turnout. In contrast, low quality calls (from multi-purpose commercial call centers) failed to increase turnout. Furthermore, we offer caution about using higher contact rates as an indication of delivery quality. Our treatment conditions with higher contact rates had no impact on turnout, suggesting an unfavorable trade-off between quantity of contacts and call quality.

AB - We demonstrate the centrality of high quality personal interactions for successfully overcoming the collective action problem of voter mobilization, and highlight the need for attention to treatment quality before making substantive inferences from field experiments. We exploit natural variation in the quality of voter mobilization phone calls across call centers to examine how call quality affects voter mobilization in a large-scale field experiment conducted during the 2010 Election. High quality calls (from call centers specializing in calling related to politics) produced significant increases in turnout. In contrast, low quality calls (from multi-purpose commercial call centers) failed to increase turnout. Furthermore, we offer caution about using higher contact rates as an indication of delivery quality. Our treatment conditions with higher contact rates had no impact on turnout, suggesting an unfavorable trade-off between quantity of contacts and call quality.

KW - Causal inference

KW - Experimental design

KW - Field experiment

KW - House effects

KW - Mobilization calls

KW - Voter mobilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891787339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891787339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-013-9264-y

DO - 10.1007/s11109-013-9264-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

ER -