The rejection of natural science approaches to psychotherapy: Language and the world

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many postmodernists appeal to theses about the relationship between language and reality as one basis for rejecting natural science approaches to psychotherapy. The theses include one or more of the following: (a) There are multiple worlds rather than just one, (b) worlds are constructed rather than discovered, and (c) worlds are not independent of mind and language. I refer to the conjunction of these three propositions as the multiple worlds-constructionist view. After examining the most systematic defense of the multiple worlds-constructionist view, I conclude that it fails, and that each component of the view is false.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-18
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Natural Science Disciplines
Psychotherapy
Language
Rejection (Psychology)
World View
Natural Science
Rejection
Postmodernist

Keywords

  • Postmodernism
  • Psychotherapy and natural science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The rejection of natural science approaches to psychotherapy : Language and the world. / Erwin, Edward.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 7-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{73922f0aa419457a95e6f1f333e89d1d,
title = "The rejection of natural science approaches to psychotherapy: Language and the world",
abstract = "Many postmodernists appeal to theses about the relationship between language and reality as one basis for rejecting natural science approaches to psychotherapy. The theses include one or more of the following: (a) There are multiple worlds rather than just one, (b) worlds are constructed rather than discovered, and (c) worlds are not independent of mind and language. I refer to the conjunction of these three propositions as the multiple worlds-constructionist view. After examining the most systematic defense of the multiple worlds-constructionist view, I conclude that it fails, and that each component of the view is false.",
keywords = "Postmodernism, Psychotherapy and natural science",
author = "Edward Erwin",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<7::AID-JCLP3>3.0.CO;2-S",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "7--18",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0021-9762",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rejection of natural science approaches to psychotherapy

T2 - Language and the world

AU - Erwin, Edward

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Many postmodernists appeal to theses about the relationship between language and reality as one basis for rejecting natural science approaches to psychotherapy. The theses include one or more of the following: (a) There are multiple worlds rather than just one, (b) worlds are constructed rather than discovered, and (c) worlds are not independent of mind and language. I refer to the conjunction of these three propositions as the multiple worlds-constructionist view. After examining the most systematic defense of the multiple worlds-constructionist view, I conclude that it fails, and that each component of the view is false.

AB - Many postmodernists appeal to theses about the relationship between language and reality as one basis for rejecting natural science approaches to psychotherapy. The theses include one or more of the following: (a) There are multiple worlds rather than just one, (b) worlds are constructed rather than discovered, and (c) worlds are not independent of mind and language. I refer to the conjunction of these three propositions as the multiple worlds-constructionist view. After examining the most systematic defense of the multiple worlds-constructionist view, I conclude that it fails, and that each component of the view is false.

KW - Postmodernism

KW - Psychotherapy and natural science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035165637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035165637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<7::AID-JCLP3>3.0.CO;2-S

DO - 10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<7::AID-JCLP3>3.0.CO;2-S

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11211290

AN - SCOPUS:0035165637

VL - 57

SP - 7

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology

SN - 0021-9762

IS - 1

ER -