Abstract
This is a study of the readability of articles in four marketing journals: Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of International Marketing, and Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. For each journal, the authors compare articles that have won an award with articles that have not. The authors find that award-winning articles are more readable, as measured by indexes focusing on sentence and word length, than nonwinning articles. The authors also identify and analyze other characteristics of more readable journal articles and discuss the importance of good writing.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 108-117 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Marketing |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2008 |
Keywords
- Award-winning articles
- Marketing journals
- Path analysis
- Readability
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Marketing
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The readability of marketing journals: Are award-winning articles better written?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Sawyer, A. G., Laran, J., & Xu, J. (2008). The readability of marketing journals: Are award-winning articles better written? Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.1.108