The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution

The criminalization of Tarasoff

Gregory B. Leong, Spencer Eth, J. Arturo Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The "duty to protect" doctrine heralded by the Tarasoff decision seeks to prevent physical harm to third parties by psychiatric patients. Recent court cases have mandated the testimony of a criminal defendant's psychotherapist both about the Tarasoff warning itself and about confidential treatment information that was associated with the warning. One court further ruled that some clinical sessions were not psychotherapy and therefore were not afforded the protection of psychotherapist-patient privilege. The continuing erosion of confidentiality has resulted in psychiatrists and other mental health professionals becoming prosecution witnesses at the criminal trials of their own patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1011-1015
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume149
Issue number8
StatePublished - Dec 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Confidentiality
Psychiatry
Mental Health
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution : The criminalization of Tarasoff. / Leong, Gregory B.; Eth, Spencer; Arturo Silva, J.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 149, No. 8, 01.12.1992, p. 1011-1015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71956c6f0e74448d997fa2c6551e300c,
title = "The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution: The criminalization of Tarasoff",
abstract = "The {"}duty to protect{"} doctrine heralded by the Tarasoff decision seeks to prevent physical harm to third parties by psychiatric patients. Recent court cases have mandated the testimony of a criminal defendant's psychotherapist both about the Tarasoff warning itself and about confidential treatment information that was associated with the warning. One court further ruled that some clinical sessions were not psychotherapy and therefore were not afforded the protection of psychotherapist-patient privilege. The continuing erosion of confidentiality has resulted in psychiatrists and other mental health professionals becoming prosecution witnesses at the criminal trials of their own patients.",
author = "Leong, {Gregory B.} and Spencer Eth and {Arturo Silva}, J.",
year = "1992",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "1011--1015",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution

T2 - The criminalization of Tarasoff

AU - Leong, Gregory B.

AU - Eth, Spencer

AU - Arturo Silva, J.

PY - 1992/12/1

Y1 - 1992/12/1

N2 - The "duty to protect" doctrine heralded by the Tarasoff decision seeks to prevent physical harm to third parties by psychiatric patients. Recent court cases have mandated the testimony of a criminal defendant's psychotherapist both about the Tarasoff warning itself and about confidential treatment information that was associated with the warning. One court further ruled that some clinical sessions were not psychotherapy and therefore were not afforded the protection of psychotherapist-patient privilege. The continuing erosion of confidentiality has resulted in psychiatrists and other mental health professionals becoming prosecution witnesses at the criminal trials of their own patients.

AB - The "duty to protect" doctrine heralded by the Tarasoff decision seeks to prevent physical harm to third parties by psychiatric patients. Recent court cases have mandated the testimony of a criminal defendant's psychotherapist both about the Tarasoff warning itself and about confidential treatment information that was associated with the warning. One court further ruled that some clinical sessions were not psychotherapy and therefore were not afforded the protection of psychotherapist-patient privilege. The continuing erosion of confidentiality has resulted in psychiatrists and other mental health professionals becoming prosecution witnesses at the criminal trials of their own patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026774101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026774101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 1011

EP - 1015

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 8

ER -