The practice of peripheral nerve blocks in the United States: A national survey

Admir Hadžić, Jerry D. Vloka, Max M. Kuroda, Robert Koorn, David J. Birnbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives. A nationwide survey was conducted in order to describe practice patterns surrounding the use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). Methods. Questionnaires were mailed to 805 anesthesiologists selected systematically from the 1995 ASA and ASRA membership directories. Responses from 409 attending anesthesiologists (response rate 56.5%) were analyzed. Results. While almost all respondents (97.8%) regularly use at least some regional anesthesia techniques in their practices, significantly fewer use PNBs, with most anesthesiologists (59.7%) performing less than five PNBs monthly. Peripheral nerve blocks of the lower extremity (femoral 32%, sciatic 22%, popliteal 11%) were less frequently used than PNB of the upper extremity (axillary 88%, interscalene 61%) (McNemar chi-square test = 215.2; P < .001). Anesthesiologists who rated their training in PNBs as adequate (50.8%) devoted a larger percentage of their practice to PNBs than anesthesiologists who rated their training as inadequate (P = .02). Despite the infrequent use of PNBs, 176 respondents (42.6%) predicted that their use of PNBs would increase in the future. Conclusions. Although this survey indicates that regional anesthesia is frequently practiced in the United States, PNBs and particularly PNBs of the lower extremities remain underutilized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-246
Number of pages6
JournalRegional anesthesia and pain medicine
Volume23
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 1998

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Ambulatory anesthesia
  • Peripheral nerve block
  • Regional anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this